What does an elegant swan mean?

The process steps of analogical reasoning of elegant swan are as follows:

1, analyze the relationship between dry words. In this metaphor, the swan symbolizes elegance. This is a symbolic relationship, that is, the swan is a symbol of elegance.

2. Analyze the options and determine the answer. In this analogy, we need to find an option in which two words have the same relationship with the words in the stem.

Item A: There is a sandstorm outside the Great Wall. This is an existential relationship, that is, outside the Great Wall is a place where sandstorms exist, which is inconsistent with the relationship in the topic and can be ruled out. Item B: Plum blossoms symbolize nobility. This is a symbolic relationship, that is, plum blossom is a noble symbol, which is consistent with the relationship in the title and can be elected.

Item C: The relationship between classmates can be friendly. This is a probable relationship, that is, there may be a friendly relationship between students, which is inconsistent with the relationship in the stem of the question and can be ruled out. Item D: Humor is a possible attribute of jokes. This is also a probable attribute relationship, that is, humor may be the attribute of a paragraph, which is inconsistent with the relationship in the topic and can be ruled out. Therefore, choose B in this question.

Analogical reasoning:

Analogical reasoning is a kind of reasoning method based on comparing the similarity or similarity of two or more objects to infer that they may be similar or the same in other aspects. This reasoning method is usually based on observation and experience, rather than strict logical argument.

In analogical reasoning, people usually look for similarities or similarities between two or more objects, such as shape, color, function, origin and so on. Then, based on these similarities or similarities, they can infer that these objects may be similar or the same in other ways.

For example, if we know that a drug has been successfully tested in humans, then we may infer that this drug will also be effective in animals, because humans and animals have physiological similarities. For another example, if we know that a plant can grow well in a specific environment, then we may infer that another plant can grow well in a similar environment.

It should be noted that analogical reasoning is a subjective and inadequate specious reasoning, so its conclusion may not be correct. To prove the correctness of his conjecture, strict logical argumentation and practical test are needed.