What do you think about the incident of a master’s degree from the Academy of Social Sciences marrying a barber and suspending his studies?

A female graduate student of the Academy of Social Sciences married a hairdresser and then took a leave of absence from school to wait for childbirth, which caused controversy among countless people. Looking back on the love process of the two people she shared, they were in love for less than a year, but she was 3 months pregnant and took a leave of absence from school to wait for childbirth. He also posted a video saying, "I just don't want to give him to others." As soon as this incident came out, a large number of netizens felt sorry for her, and of course I did too. I always believe that studying is for increasing knowledge and broadening one's horizons, rather than for a person to walk back from a school in the mountains that cannot be located on a map without hesitation. She knew that her education journey was not easy, and she went all the way to the postgraduate level of the Academy of Social Sciences. I thought she would continue her studies with the intention of doing scientific research to contribute to society and the motherland. But the fact is not only surprising but also shocking.

Of course, everyone has the right to choose how to live. We cannot interfere in anyone's decision. We can only say that we feel sorry for her. And when it was revealed that her boyfriend was not actually a hairdresser, but had registered a media company, and what she was doing might be to attract traffic to the company, this emotion turned into helplessness. The Internet was overwhelmingly popular, and countless people regretted their affair with her. In the end, they discovered that she was not a love brain but an "economic brain."

Along with this, we have to pay attention to the choice of tutors during the postgraduate entrance examination whether to take female graduate students. According to this incident, this female graduate student was a graduate student admitted under the minority quota. She only recruited two students from the same tutor during the same period, and after she dropped out of school, it meant that the research tasks fell on one person's shoulders. Although this society has been pursuing equality between men and women, we cannot deny that in some job recruitments, there are still implicit requirements for marriage and childbirth. So after this incident, when postgraduate entrance examinations are so involved, will women's marriage and childbearing issues directly affect the choice of tutors, and how much impact will it have? No one dares to comment on this issue.

Returning to the Nanyi incident, she created an inspirational case of "even if there is discrimination, women can have more choices", and at the same time told everyone that even if they pursue personal dreams, they must pay attention to the value of reproduction. Conceding that although she had the right to choose in reproduction as an adult, she took it upon herself to shake the idea that women could have more possibilities. "Look, girls have to return to their families in the end." This is the most helpless common thought in society. In fact, in the final analysis, she has the right to have children, and there is nothing wrong with her choice. However, behind this matter, whether society's implicit discrimination against women will cause obstacles to women's studies or job hunting is what needs to be paid more attention to.