Who is the other person who stabbed Qin Yishui by Jing Ke? What will happen if Qin succeeds? Is Jing Ke's failure to stab Qin related to that person?

We can see that several other assassins in Historical Records, such as Yu Rang and Zhuan Xu, have a tacit understanding with their masters. They are either particularly trusted by their masters or loyal to them. However, there is a great gap between Taizi Dan and Jing Ke, which is the main reason why Jing Ke failed to stab Qin.

Even if Qin Shihuang dies, it will have no influence on the great cause of Qin reunification. We can know that after Qin Shihuang bravely killed the enemy for the sixth time, since Qin filial piety, the monarch has been wise and able to employ people in coachable regardless of his ability or not. Even if Qin Shihuang died, the system of Qin State at that time could definitely guarantee the election of a wiser monarch.

On the other hand, if a country wants to be strong, there are three ways, which are also the three aspects that Premier Qin once put forward.

One is kingly way, which was advocated by Confucius. This kind of thing is excellent in theory and quite difficult to implement. And it takes a long time to see the effect, which is generally not used by monarchs in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

The second is bullying, that is, on the basis of a certain theory, it is fast and powerful. For example, Guan Zhong of Qi State. However, hegemony is fast and decline is fast. Since Guan Zhong's death, Qi has gone from bad to worse, which is the best proof.

Third, Qiang Bing, a rich country. This is also the method adopted by the Qin Dynasty. When Fan Ju recommended the first two projects, he had no choice but to give up the plan. Therefore, it has been attached importance to by the state of Qin and has become the basic national policy of Qin. This article is mainly to seek hegemony quickly and at all costs. So by the end of Qin dynasty, basically the whole country was centered on war and practiced legalism.

No matter what the above points are, we need wise men, not people who only lead troops to fight. During the Warring States period, if there were only generals, it might be successful for a while, but it would soon decline. For example, King Wei Huiwen used Pang Juan and Zhao Guolian to attack Li Mu and Zhao She. During the period of Yan's prosperity, I also knew that looking for talents like Su Qin, at least not a powerful country, could get tangible benefits and almost destroyed Qi. But in the later period of Yan, even such talents were not wanted, and they just thought of relying on assassins to turn things around. Is this not a joke? This also shows the political ignorance of Yan Guojun and Taizi Dan.