How to evaluate twelve citizens? Was the adaptation successful?

Twelve Citizens is adapted from the American film 12 Angry Men in 1957, which is a well-adapted play in terms of plot setting and actor interpretation.

Twelve Citizens is a group photo work that reflects the reality of China, and it has done a good job in localizing the classics. The most direct performance in the film is the jury system in western France. In the well-developed United States, the jury system is an important symbol of democracy and judicial independence. Many people even think that the jury system is more important than democratic elections.

Because democratic elections are just about choosing a state machine to manage the country, and the jury system determines the trial of a person's fate, the importance of the jury system can be imagined in the West where human rights are above all else.

"Twelve Citizens" explores general knowledge through legal themes, truly reflects the current social situation in China by means of group images, shows prejudice and expresses the pursuit of justice at the same time, and tries to practice the current China society with new legal drama texts, so that every audience can have a * * * sound with it, which is also of great practical significance to the film.

Extended information:

Synopsis

In a university of political science and law in the summer, students who failed the final exam of the Anglo-American Law course welcomed the make-up exam. They formed a mock western court, which played the roles of judge, lawyer and prosecutor respectively, and tried a controversial case of "patricide of the 2-year-old rich second generation". Twelve parents of students formed a jury.

These people come from different social strata, including doctors, real estate agents, security guards, professors, insurance salesmen and so on. They will make a final judgment on this case after hearing the case in the student court. These 12 jurors don't know each other, but according to the rules, they must reach an agreement before they can end the trial.

In the first round of voting, 11 people found the "rich second generation" guilty, and all the physical evidence pointed to this result, the young suspect was only one step away from the death of public opinion. All the clues were discussed one by one. As the trial went on, doubts appeared and the stories behind everyone surfaced.