Media comment tiger bite: what is the law of poor life?

Some information is still unclear, such as how the man was dragged into the tiger garden by the tiger; Is it true that online men "evaded tickets and entered by mistake" and "crossed privately"? Some media reported that the man was taken into the park by a tiger at 14: 30 and was rescued at 15: 43. Is there any delay in the rescue? There are also tourists who report that there is no protective net installed in the glass that closes the tiger ... these question marks need to be straightened.

This year's Spring Festival Evening crosstalk "New Tiger's Mouth Fantasy" is very popular. But in reality, people are not allowed to "joke" at the cost of falling into the jaws of death. At present, many bull's-eyes are too radical for the dead, and the tragedy cannot be "segmented". But outside the case, some reminders are not unnecessary: for example, keeping a sense of rules.

According to Weibo, tourism and holiday management committee of Dongqian Lake in Ningbo, around1October 29th 14, an adult man appeared in Hushan of Youngor Zoo and was attacked by a tiger. At present, people have been rescued and rushed to the hospital for emergency treatment. The specific cause of the accident is under further investigation. At 3: 40 pm that day, the person in charge of the Youngor Zoo surnamed Zhang told the reporter that the attacker's tiger had been killed by the special police who went to the rescue and other tigers had been dispersed. The injured have been sent to Yinzhou Second Hospital. At 5: 34 pm that day, the reporter learned from Ningbo Dongqian Lake Tourism and Holiday Management Committee that the man who was attacked by the tiger died after being rescued. At about 1 1: 45 that night, the management committee of Ningbo Dongqian Lake Tourism Resort issued a message through the official Weibo saying: "The deceased man surnamed Zhang climbed over the wall and entered the Sanhu District without buying a ticket." At present, the relevant departments are further investigating and verifying the relevant situation.

The injured man died.

After the incident, it was reported that the man teased the tiger at close range outside the fence and was dragged into the tiger garden by the tiger; It is also reported that the man did not buy a ticket to enter the park, but turned directly into the tiger park from the outer wall of the zoo. On the second day of the Lunar New Year, Youngor Zoo has many tourists. Judging from the videos posted by tourists on the Internet, the man who was attacked by the tiger is dying. In this two-minute video, at first, two tigers were biting the man, and then the third and fourth tigers slowly approached. During this period, the park staff tried to drive the tigers away by setting off firecrackers and firing guns. Three tigers were scared away, but one of them still didn't stop.

After the incident, public security and medical staff quickly rushed to the scene. With the cooperation of the public security organs and the park staff, the injured man was rescued and immediately sent to the nearest Yinzhou Second Hospital in Ningbo for rescue, but eventually died of his injuries.

Garden: I didn't buy a ticket to climb the wall.

According to public information, Ningbo Youngor Zoo, formerly known as Ningbo Dongqian Lake Wildlife Park, covers an area of 1.900 mu, with more than 200 species and nearly 10,000 animals in the park, making it the largest wildlife park in China. Tiger Garden is similar to a peninsula, with mountains on the back and fences for tourists. There is a river three or four meters wide between the fence and Hushan. A person in charge of the zoo surnamed Zhang concluded that the man did not jump into the park from one side of the fence.

The person in charge said: "It's all dry, so it's impossible to swim from here, and there are railings in front of the river, so it's impossible to cross it." The person in charge said that the video of the park can prove that the man did not buy a ticket, but jumped over the fence outside the zoo and jumped directly into the tiger park. Another woman in charge of the park holds the same view: "I know he escaped from the outside, but the police have to identify him." The person in charge also said that the man may have drunk alcohol. At present, the police did not answer whether the man drank alcohol that day. Some tourists questioned the irregular management of the zoo and the lack of necessary warning signs. The person in charge of the park responded that the fence that the man climbed was more than three meters high, and there was a warning that "there are wild animals inside, please don't climb".

65438+1At about 0: 45pm on October 29th, the management committee of Dongqian Lake Tourist Resort in Ningbo, where the zoo is located, released a message through the official Weibo, confirming that the man who died in the tiger wounding incident in Youngor Zoo was surnamed Zhang and originally from Hubei. In response, at about 2 pm that day, Zhang, his wife and two children, and Li Moumou and his wife went to the north gate of Youngor Zoo. After Zhang's wife, two children and Li's wife bought tickets to enter the park, Zhang and Li did not buy tickets. Instead, I climbed over the 3-meter-high fence outside the zoo from the west side of the north gate of the zoo, drilled through the barbed wire and climbed up the 3-meter-high fence in the tiger release area. There are obvious warning signs on the outside of the fence, and a 70-cm-wide Zhang enters the tiger release area at the top, but Li does not. Relevant departments are further investigating and verifying the situation.

Tragedy should not be "divided"

The tragedy of tiger biting, which happened in the festive node of "the first year of Yuan Dynasty, auspicious day", became more and more serious. Life is miserable, and the man involved died in the gate of hell, which makes people feel sad and sad: his death declared that the last turning point of the tragedy was blocked. There is no doubt that the sudden end of such a life is bereavement for the family, and it is also sad for you and me.

We should show sympathy for the deceased, but the right or wrong of this matter still needs to be clarified, which is also an explanation to all parties involved and public opinion. At present, some information is still unclear, such as how men were dragged into the tiger garden by tigers; Is it true that online men "evaded tickets and entered by mistake" and "crossed privately"? Some media reported that the man was taken into the park by a tiger at 14: 30 and was rescued at 15: 43. Is there any delay in the rescue? There are also tourists who report that there is no protective net installed in the glass that closes the tiger ... these question marks need to be straightened. Now the local police have been involved in the investigation, hoping that they can use the park surveillance video to carefully verify and find out and announce the truth as soon as possible.

This tragedy is easy to remind people of animal injuries in many zoos in the past. These incidents vary widely in specific circumstances, but the responsibilities of zoo managers and tourists in such accidents are exactly the same.

Although human death is sad, it is still necessary to return to the framework of taking law as the criterion. For animal injuries in zoos, the Tort Liability Law clearly applies "inversion of burden of proof": "If animals in zoos cause damage to others, zoos should bear tort liability, but those who can prove that they have fulfilled their management duties will not bear liability". The only legal case of zoo exemption is to prove that it has "fulfilled its management duties"-attention is supervision, not just reminding.

Whether a man crosses the river between Hushan and the tourist area and enters the "forbidden zone" or not, the zoo has endless isolation and the responsibility of saving people on the spot, which is related to the division of responsibilities between the two sides. In terms of reasonable liability for accidents, there is a Hande formula: B (accident prevention cost) < P (accident probability) ×L (accident loss). In other words, the responsibility of the parties is inversely proportional to the cost of avoiding accidents.

On the Internet, many people "sympathize with the killed tiger". This is a perceptual judgment, which combines many assumptions based on "gossip". If you kill a tiger in order to save people in an emergency, it is in line with the principle of humanity and the elements of "emergency avoidance" in civil law to take emergency measures such as "shooting". Of course, it also depends on whether tiger hunting is "during" or "after", and whether the specific situation is appropriate.

The truth is the basis of the conclusion. At present, many statements that aim the bull's-eye at the dead are too radical, and the tragedy cannot be "segmented". But outside the case, some reminders are not unnecessary: for example, keeping a sense of rules. Many times, we only see the low cost and benefits of ignoring the rules, but forget the risks behind the rules being ignored.

This year's Spring Festival Evening, the comic dialogue "Fantasy in the New Tiger's Mouth" was very popular. People fell beside the tiger's mouth and made a bunch of jokes. But in reality, people are not allowed to "joke" at the cost of falling into the jaws of death. When you play in the zoo, you must strictly abide by the rules. Even if you are curious, you should stay within the boundaries set by rules and reason. It's okay to be a simile, but it's terrible to be a practical guide.

The dead are gone, but Yin Jian is still here. The responsibility of this tiger bite in Ningbo has yet to be clarified and must be clarified, but its metaphor is still a warning-fear of rules is often a way of self-protection, and the lack of awareness of rules is often the beginning of disaster.