Double eleven return joke

As we all know, every year, the online shopping platform will launch some preferential activities such as 300-40 and 200-20, which will undoubtedly stimulate consumption and make consumers feel that they have got a big bargain. However, in the process of online shopping, some consumers will choose to buy more goods and pay together because the things they want to buy are not full, but they don't want the added goods, and then apply for a refund, just to enjoy the full reduction.

It's really hard to say whether it's immoral to buy things together and refund money. From the perspective of honesty and contractual spirit, this is obviously immoral. But for consumers, the platform does not stipulate that this is not allowed. If the wool is scraped, it is still the wool on the platform, which has no bad influence on the merchants.

From the merchant's point of view, although there is no reason to return the goods for 7 days, consumers have caused certain losses by returning the goods for a refund in order to make up the bill. Because the double 1 1 refund channel is closed on the same day, the refund cannot be processed on the same day. As soon as the refund channel 12 was opened, many consumers began to refund. However, a lot of goods were delivered on the same day, resulting in the loss of courier fees. Here's a suggestion. If you have to make up the order, you can tell the other customer service not to deliver it immediately after taking it. Just say that you need to make up the bill and then you need a refund. I'm sure they won't be stupid enough to continue to deliver goods to you, so as not to cause unnecessary trouble.

From the consumer's point of view, being a consumer can save a little, so I don't feel immoral. Since the platform does not stipulate such rules? Can't I enjoy coupon reduction for partial refund of goods? The terms of the platform prove that the platform is allowed to do so. This activity itself is the joint business of the platform. Since merchants participate in the activities of the platform, they must respect the rules of the platform and feel that it is not worth participating in the activities.

It can be said that the public is right and the woman is right. What do you think of this?