What does the veto power of the Security Council mean?

One-vote veto by the Security Council is the meaning of the existence of the Council itself. Once the great powers lose this privilege, then this institution must exist. After all, they still have no power after paying so much money every year. Why do you want to join this organization? It is precisely because all the powerful countries in the world have joined this organization that small countries can brush their sense of existence or gain benefits, while big countries can exaggerate their influence and improve their international discourse power through this organization and its one-vote veto power.

One vote veto is too important, not only for rabbits, but also for the other four. For example, if an island wants to be independent, it first needs to join an international organization and let itself listen to its own voice. Then the UN Security Council is the best platform, but the right to enter the door is in the hands of the P5, and even one person can't agree. Therefore, it is very helpful for rabbits to recover their land, and it can also avoid the passage of some unfavorable bills.

It is also beneficial to other countries. India, for example, has always felt that it has nuclear weapons and can fight rabbits from time to time in the world, so it is natural to enter the P5. Of course, the P5 have always been dismissive of this arrogant attitude, but they can't resist the temptation of interests. India buys Russian arms at high prices from time to time, forcing Russia to continue its life; From time to time, I give benefits to the United States, and I am very happy for Trump. So they all acquiesced that India could join the P5, but they didn't want anyone to share the cake of world resources with them.

The reason why India did not make a mistake in giving benefits and agreed to India's entry into the P5 is because they know that rabbits will definitely not pass India, and the significance of one-vote veto is reflected here. This right is not only beneficial to internal energy, but also effective to external energy. So isn't there a joke suggested by some small countries? Abolish the one-vote veto? For the five permanent members? One vote veto? Rejected the offer.