An 800-word essay on college entrance examination materials for charity

The Tianjin Port explosion touched people's hearts, and many people made spontaneous donations. After the explosion, many netizens began to leave messages on Jack Ma's Weibo, pointing out why Jack Ma did not donate. Some even shouted "Dad" while blaming Jack Ma.

To sum up, there are roughly three reasons for asking Jack Ma to donate: you have money, you should donate; other entertainment stars have donated, so you should donate even more; if you don’t donate, sooner or later you will be ruined.

What thoughts did this incident trigger in you? Please write an article with an angle of your own choice and a topic of your own choosing, no less than 700 words. Requirements: Clear opinions, well-founded, orderly comments, and concise language.

Charity is not a stage for hype

After the Tianjin explosion, many netizens left messages on Jack Ma’s Weibo, threatening to force him to donate.

Should Jack Ma donate? I think even if the answer is yes, he should not be forced to donate due to the questioning of netizens. The starting point for selfless dedication to compatriots in disaster should be in the heart, not personal reputation or face.

Charity is one of the warmest words in the world, because it contains the concern and helping hand that arise from sympathy and understanding between people who have never met before. It is selfless and noble. . Engaging in charity is not the responsibility of any celebrity, nor is it a burden for any rich man, nor is it a game for the poor to get rich. Donating money comes from emotion, and it is reasonable not to donate. How can Jack Ma insist on donating?

If Jack Ma really donated under the pressure of public opinion, then this letter is full of helplessness and coercion. .Can charity really make accident victims feel warm?

The answer is undoubtedly no. Sadly, many donations in today's society are made by celebrities who cannot bear the pressure of public opinion. They spend money to seek a good reputation, or follow the trend and take advantage of the opportunity to hype--it eventually turns into a game like the ice bucket incident, which tells us clearly that today's so-called philanthropy is mixed with filth. The money that should be innocent and sacred is contaminated with distracting thoughts, and the heart that should be sincere and enthusiastic is filled with fame and fortune?

Returning to the Jack Ma incident, the money is already impure and dishonest. , if it is really donated, whose wish will be fulfilled and whose heart will be pleased?

It is those netizens who are "worried about the victims" and eagerly force Jack Ma to donate money. Many of them are widely known as or think of themselves as "public intellectuals," that is, a group of "public intellectuals" who claim to have a critical spirit and moral responsibility. They claim to be upright and have morally kidnapped others, especially celebrities, in numerous incidents in recent years. And behind their "noble" masks, there is a desire to see celebrities' jokes and fear that the world will not be in chaos. The contrast between what they say and what they do is disgusting, and the online public opinion dominated by them is worrying - and how many people in this society, although they are not online, also hold the idea of ??forcing celebrities to donate money. How about balancing your dissatisfaction with the wealth gap?

Just thinking about it is already scary. We only hope that we will not be "public intellectuals" in our lives, correctly view the financial gap with celebrities, and especially treat donations and charity sincerely, and do not let it become a stage for hype.