If we eat without drinking together and someone else drinks and an accident occurs, are we also legally responsible?

If we eat together without drinking, and someone else drinks and an accident occurs, will we also be legally responsible?

Bear corresponding civil liability for compensation according to the specific circumstances.

First, whether the people who drank together were at fault such as persuading people to drink; second, whether the accident occurred was directly related to drinking; third, whether there was a causal relationship between the accident and drinking.

Improper persuasion or forcible persuasion will have harmful consequences. If improper persuasion to drink causes harm, in addition to the drinker being responsible for the risk, the person persuading the drink will also bear corresponding civil or even criminal liability. It is common sense that excessive drinking can cause harm to the body. Any person with full capacity for civil conduct must bear responsibility for his or her own actions. If a drinker refuses to drink alcohol and causes excessive drinking and causes harm to his own body or others, he should first be held personally responsible. That is to say, the principle of responsibility of the drinker should be implemented first. Therefore, when allocating responsibilities, it is generally determined that the drunk person bears the primary responsibility and the person who persuades the person to drink alcohol bears the secondary responsibility. That is, the person who persuades the person to drink alcohol should generally bear the liability for damages in the range of 10% to 30%. I was drinking with a friend and my friend had an accident while driving home. Are the people who drank with him legally responsible?

Is your friend a driver? If the driver is a driver, and the person who persuades the driver to drink knows that the driver is already too drunk and still continues to persuade the driver to drink, causing the driver to get drunk and eventually causing an accident, the person who persuades the driver to drink must also bear certain responsibilities. After several people ate and drank together, one of them died after returning home. Are the others who ate and drank with him legally responsible? The person who dies after drinking and the person who persuaded him to drink must bear corresponding legal responsibilities; at the same time, the people who drank together have the obligation to take care of the drunk person after the meal, and those who fail to fulfill this obligation will also bear corresponding legal responsibilities. If If you are not at fault and have fulfilled your duty of care, you do not have to bear responsibility.

Four people drank together and one of them died. If the other three did not force the person to drink or other faults, they would not be liable for compensation.

If there is fault, the victim should be compensated for personal injuries, various expenses incurred due to medical treatment, and loss of income due to missed work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, and nursing care. The person with the obligation to compensate shall compensate for the expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospitalization food subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses. If the victim dies, the compensation obligor shall, in addition to compensation for the relevant expenses stipulated in paragraph 1 of this article based on the rescue and treatment conditions, also compensate for funeral expenses, living expenses of dependents, death compensation expenses, and transportation expenses incurred by relatives of the victim to handle funeral matters. , accommodation fees, lost work time and other reasonable expenses.

Legal basis: Article 16 of the Tort Liability Law: Anyone who infringes upon others and causes personal injury shall compensate for reasonable expenses such as medical expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, etc. for treatment and recovery, as well as for missed work hours. Reduced income. If disability is caused, compensation for disability living aids and disability compensation shall also be provided. If death is caused, funeral expenses and death compensation should also be compensated. If the boss doesn’t drink, will the boss be legally responsible if others drink?

Four situations in which he is persuaded to drink will bear legal responsibility

When drinking with others, if something goes wrong while drinking, there are four situations in which he can be persuaded to drink. The perpetrator must bear legal responsibility:

1. Forced persuasion to drink, such as using language such as "If you don't drink, you are not enough to be a friend," *** the other party drinks, or when the other party is drunk, unconscious and has no self-control , the act of still persuading someone to drink;

2. Knowing that the other person cannot drink but still persuading him to drink, such as knowing the other person’s physical condition, but still persuading him to drink to induce diseases;

3. Not doing so Safely escort the drunk person, if the drinker has lost or is about to lose the ability to control himself, is delirious and cannot control his own behavior, the drinking friend does not send him to the hospital or safely send him home;

4. Failure to stop drunk driving leads to car accidents and other damages. Am I legally responsible for a cerebral hemorrhage when a friend eats without drinking?

Drunk accidents have occurred frequently in recent years, causing irreparable consequences and losses to society and families. Therefore, what are the reasons for accidents caused by drinking? Who bears responsibility has also become a focus of attention. The author concludes that there are six types of actors who must bear legal responsibility for the consequences of damage caused by drinking, and even bear criminal responsibility.

The first type is a person who compulsively persuades the person to drink, such as someone who deliberately drinks alcohol or sexually persuades someone to drink. This kind of person must bear corresponding legal responsibility for any consequences that occur to the person who is persuaded to drink.

The second type is a person who advises a drinker to drink despite knowing that he cannot drink or is unwell. This kind of person will be legally responsible for the consequences of the other party's diseases caused by drinking and drunk driving accidents.

The third type is a person who lets his drinking partner drive away after drinking together. In this case, if a traffic accident occurs, the drinking partner must not only bear responsibility for the partner who drank with him or her, but also We must bear corresponding responsibilities to the counterparties who were harmed by the accident.

The fourth type is a person who does not escort the drunk person safely after drinking. If the drinker has lost or is about to lose the ability to control himself and is unconscious and unable to control his behavior. , the drinking friend did not send him to the hospital or send him home safely, so the driver and the drinker who had the accident must bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

The fifth category is a person who knowingly knows that the driver is drinking and instigates the driver to drive drunk. This kind of person will not only bear civil liability for the consequences of a traffic accident, but also instigates the driver to drive despite knowing that the driver is drunk. He is also suspected of dangerous driving and may be held criminally responsible.

The sixth type is that the organizer of the liquor bureau must bear the obligation to drink moderately and provide safe escort after drinking, otherwise he will bear corresponding legal liability after an accident. If an accident occurs to one of several people while drinking, are the others responsible?

In a specific environment where several people drink together, laws are formed between the host of the banquet and the guests, and between the guests eating together. In the fictional neighbor relationship above, it is the previous drinking behavior that creates the premise of the duty of care not to put the neighbor in an unsafe state. As an ordinary reasonable person, everyone should reasonably foresee that there will be unsafety and the possibility of damage if a neighbor drinks. When a neighbor engages in dangerous behavior or may be in a dangerous situation, everyone has the right not to cause harm to his neighbor. If the duty of care is compromised, neighbors should be reminded and discouraged from committing such dangerous acts. In particular, the host of the banquet, as the organizer, should pay attention to the obligation to ensure the personal and property safety of the guests who come to the banquet during and after drinking, so as to prevent the guests from being harmed. When guests drink, the host should promptly remind and advise against excessive drinking, and should also prevent drunk guests from engaging in highly unsafe behaviors such as driving and highly dangerous operations. Similarly, guests who participate in a meal together have a similar duty of care to other drunk people for the safety of their neighbors' personal and property, regardless of whether the perpetrator participated in the drinking behavior, because the duty of care rule does not punish the previous drinking behavior, but the previous drinking behavior. It is a punishment for failure to exercise a duty of care for the safety of neighbors. If those who participate in sex and drinking activities fail to fulfill their obligations to remind and dissuade their neighbors, their inaction is a violation of their own duty of care, which may cause their neighbors to drink too much and put them in an unsafe state. They should foresee that their inaction may cause damage to their neighbors. Therefore, the violation of this duty of care is due to negligence and failure to foresee their own responsibilities. It is a subjective state of negligence and constitutes subjective fault in general torts. Requirements. To point to joint and several liability, you need to investigate and check whether someone toasted, knowing that he was drunk and letting him go home alone, and no one went to see him off or stayed behind to prevent him from leaving, etc. If there are none, then there will be no main responsibility. Is it a minor legal responsibility to drink and fight?

Committing a crime after drinking is not a case of mitigating punishment. If someone is bitten by a snake after drinking, the person who drank with him must be held responsible. Are you legally responsible?

According to the "General Principles of Civil Law", "Tort Liability Law" and other legal provisions, in most cases the drinker who suffers personal injury should bear the loss. However, if the following situations occur, the person who drank the same drink should also bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

If something goes wrong while drinking with others, there are four situations in which the person who persuades you to drink must bear legal responsibility:

1. Compulsive persuasion, such as "If you don't drink, you won't be friends enough" etc. Language*** The act of persuading the other party to drink alcohol when the other party is already drunk, unconscious and has no self-control;

2. Advising the other party to drink alcohol even though you know that the other party cannot drink, such as knowing that the other party cannot drink. The other party's physical condition still persuades him to drink alcohol to induce diseases;

3. Failure to escort the drunk person safely, such as when the drinker has lost or is about to lose the ability to control himself, and is unconscious and unable to control his own behavior , the drinking friend failed to send him to the hospital or send him home safely;

4. Failure to stop drunk driving resulted in a car accident and other damages.

The above are the four situations in which *** people need to take responsibility when drinking together. I hope everyone will pay attention to propriety when drinking and not let people drink excessively, otherwise they will bear legal consequences! A few people drink, get angry and fight, causing cerebral infarction. Are the others legally responsible?

There are six types of actors who are legally responsible for the consequences of damage caused by drinking, and even bear criminal responsibility.

The first type is a person who compulsively persuades the person to drink, such as someone who deliberately drinks alcohol or sexually persuades someone to drink. This kind of person must bear corresponding legal responsibility for any consequences that occur to the person who is persuaded to drink.

The second type is a person who advises a drinker to drink despite knowing that he cannot drink or is unwell. This kind of person will be legally responsible for the consequences of the other party's diseases caused by drinking and drunk driving accidents.

The third type is a person who lets his drinking partner drive away after drinking together. In this case, if a traffic accident occurs, the drinking partner must not only bear responsibility for the partner who drank with him or her, but also We must bear corresponding responsibilities to the counterparties who were harmed by the accident.

The fourth type is a person who fails to escort the drunk person safely after drinking. If the drinker has lost or is about to lose the ability to control himself and is unconscious and unable to control his behavior. , the drinking friend did not send him to the hospital or send him home safely, so the driver and the drinker who had the accident must bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

The fifth category is a person who knowingly knows that the driver is drinking and instigates the driver to drive drunk. This kind of person will not only bear civil liability for the consequences of a traffic accident, but also instigates the driver to drive despite knowing that the driver is drunk. He is also suspected of dangerous driving and may be held criminally responsible.

The sixth type is that the organizer of the liquor bureau must bear the obligation to drink moderately and provide safe escort after drinking, otherwise he will bear corresponding legal liability after an accident. If someone disappears after drinking, will the person responsible be held legally responsible?

Drunk accidents have occurred frequently in recent years, causing irreparable consequences and losses to society and families. Therefore, who should bear the responsibility after a drinking accident? Responsibility has also become a focus of people's attention. The author concludes that there are six types of actors who must bear legal responsibility for the consequences of damage caused by drinking, and even bear criminal responsibility.

The first type is a person who compulsively persuades the person to drink, such as someone who deliberately drinks alcohol or sexually persuades someone to drink. This kind of person must bear corresponding legal responsibility for any consequences that occur to the person who is persuaded to drink.

The second type is a person who advises a drinker to drink despite knowing that he cannot drink or is unwell. This kind of person shall bear legal responsibility for the other party’s diseases caused by drinking and drunk driving accidents.

The third type is a person who lets his drinking partner drive away after drinking together. In this case, if a traffic accident occurs, the drinking partner must not only bear responsibility for the partner who drank with him or her, but also We must bear corresponding responsibilities to the counterparties who were harmed by the accident.

The fourth type is a person who fails to escort the drunk person safely after drinking. If the drinker has lost or is about to lose the ability to control himself and is unconscious and unable to control his behavior. , the drinking friend did not send him to the hospital or send him home safely, so the driver and the drinker who had the accident must bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

The fifth category is a person who knowingly knows that the driver is drinking and instigates the driver to drive drunk. This kind of person will not only bear civil liability for the consequences of a traffic accident, but also instigates the driver to drive despite knowing that the driver is drunk. He is also suspected of dangerous driving and may be held criminally responsible.

The sixth type is that the organizer of the liquor bureau must bear the obligation to drink moderately and provide safe escort after drinking, otherwise he will bear corresponding legal liability after an accident.

In recent years, with the development of social economy, people's living standards have continued to improve, and the drinking of alcohol has also increased year by year. The problem caused by this is that the number of patients with alcohol poisoning is increasing day by day, leading to alcohol addiction. There are more and more poisoned patients!

Main manifestations

1. Alcohol dependence syndrome, which is a special psychological and physiological state caused by repeated drinking. The patient has a thirst for alcohol and a constant need to drink. The feeling may occur continuously or intermittently. If you stop drinking, you may experience psychological and life withdrawal symptoms. The syndrome has the following clinical characteristics:

① Uncontrollable thirst for drinking;

② Fixed drinking pattern, the patient must drink at a fixed time regardless of the occasion. To avoid or alleviate withdrawal symptoms;

③Drinking has become the center of all activities, so much so that it significantly affects work, family life and social activities;

④Tolerance gradually increases, and patients In order to obtain the initial effects of drinking or to prevent the occurrence of physiological withdrawal symptoms, it is necessary to continuously increase the amount of drinking;

⑤ Withdrawal syndrome occurs repeatedly. If the patient reduces the amount of alcohol or prolongs the interval between drinking, it will cause The concentration of alcohol in the body decreases and a withdrawal syndrome occurs. The most common symptoms are tremors of hands, feet, limbs and trunk, ataxia, irritability, and prone to startle reactions; excessive sweating, nausea, and vomiting can also be seen.

2. Delirium tremens. After long-term drinking, the patient suddenly reduces the amount of alcohol or stops drinking, which can quickly cause temporary disturbance of consciousness. During the attack, the patient is unconscious, has time and location obstacles, and has vivid and vivid visual hallucinations and delusions of persecution; thus, he exhibits extreme fear, restlessness, or impulsive behavior. At the same time, patients can see large tremors in their limbs and ataxia, often accompanied by fever, sweating, tachycardia, elevated blood pressure, and mydriasis. In severe cases, it can be life-threatening. The duration of delirium tremens varies, generally ranging from 3 to 5 days. After recovery, the patient forgets part or all of the illness.

3. Alcoholic hallucination, which is a hallucinatory state caused by long-term drinking. Patients experience a large number of rich and vivid hallucinations within 1 to 2 days after suddenly reducing or stopping drinking, with hallucinations being the main problem. Primitive visual hallucinations and commentative and command auditory hallucinations are common. On the basis of hallucinations, fragmentary delusions and corresponding nervousness, fear or depression may also occur. During the onset of the disease, the patient's state of consciousness was clear, and there were no obvious symptoms of psychomotor excitement or autonomic nervous system hyperfunction.

4. Alcoholism delusion, in which patients have delusions of jealousy and delusions of persecution when they are conscious, and clinically the former is more common. Patients have unreasonable suspicions that their spouses are unfaithful, and often react violently, which can also lead to attacks on suspicious objects or spouses, sometimes leading to murder. In the past, it was also called toxic jealousy caused by alcohol.

5. Alcoholic encephalopathy This is the most serious mental state of chronic alcoholism. It is the result of organic damage to the brain caused by long-term heavy drinking. The main clinical features are delirium, memory impairment, dementia and personality changes, and most patients cannot fully return to normal.

The above mainly introduces the main manifestations of chronic alcoholic mental disorders. Mental disorders caused by alcohol will cause great harm to the patient's mind and body, and will also bring certain harm to the family and society. burden. Therefore, measures should be taken immediately once symptoms appear, and if symptoms are severe, you should go to the hospital to receive professional treatment.