What will happen if the Liaoning ship compares with the combat effectiveness of those Japanese aircraft carriers?

Assuming that the Izumo-class helicopter destroyer in Japan has solved the problems of deck strength and high temperature resistance (including a series of changes in the center of gravity) equipped with the F-35B, the efficiency of take-off, service and dispatch will not be too high at first.

Due to the limitation of the position of the front elevator and the width of the flight deck, the front elevator is almost useless when the F-35B takes off, and its position has a great influence on the dispatching efficiency of the aircraft on the deck (even if it is modified to starboard, it is limited, in short, because there is a lack of necessary safe distance between the maintenance area, the dispatching area and the landing area).

The size of Yun Yun-class hangar is limited (about 125m in length and 20m in width, which is not guaranteed to be correct). After leaving the necessary space for aircraft dispatching and ship-borne helicopters, the F-35B is not enough (about 6-7, don't forget that the F-35B can't fold its wings), and the rest can only be tied to the deck.

A hangar with clouds (about half a hangar), imagine that an F-35B with a wingspan of 35 feet and a length of 50.5 feet is crammed into such a cramped hangar ... and it faces an extreme shortage of jet fuel, spare parts and ammunition reserves (after all, it is a warship with a full displacement of 20,000 tons (27,000 tons)). How can there be so much room for these? An F-35B can reach 6 when it is fully fueled. 1 ton. )

U.S. Navy's plan of amphibious assault ship. There is no dock in the United States, and it is optimized for aviation operations. However, its hangar and deck area are not larger than Izumo (on the contrary, it is narrower), and it is also cramped when carrying the F-35B.

Space on the back deck is limited. After about four F-35B's have been loaded and refueled in the stern, the rest can only wait slowly (it can't stop the ammunition elevator on the back deck). There is only one airplane elevator on the back deck, which leads to excessive take-off pressure in a short time.

The plane on the front deck is hardly helpful for take-off and preparation (see above). The flight deck is 238 meters long. Under certain deck wind, two AIM- 120 and two JDAM 1000 pounds are hung in the bomb bay of the F-35B, and they take off with half oil (about 7,000 pounds), ensuring a combat radius of 300-400 nautical miles.

Of course, if the ski jump deck is not modified, the combat radius will still be relatively large, and the take-off and landing will be very reluctant. In short, the deck area and the number of elevators available are the most critical points-where did the F-35B come from?

Of course, the F-35 series overwhelmed the third-generation aircraft in battlefield situation awareness, multitasking, and other flight indicators, including controllable angle of attack, instant delivery, and stable delivery ("fat power" is a joke after all), but when the United States let go and sold it to the Japanese F-35B, it was impossible for our fourth generation to have no movement at all, right?

Therefore, the problems of anti-ablation and deck strength of the deck are quite easy to solve. The key issue is where the F-35B comes from, followed by dispatch efficiency. The Izumo-class helicopter carrier is still doing formation command and fleet anti-submarine work; If necessary, make a guest appearance as a member of the vertical landing operation and send a fake? Amphibious assault ship's addiction.