2065438+2004 current affairs review: 600 words and two articles should be the latest.

How to treat the problem of "the wind of luxury construction"

Current affairs review background:

Seven cadres build six-story office buildings, eight kilometers of scenic avenues are built at the entrance of expressways, and poverty-stricken counties with financial revenues of several hundred million borrow billions to build special buildings ... In recent years, luxurious and wasteful buildings, landmarks and buildings often break into the spotlight, but they can always get a lot of rectification, and they will rise again after a while. This time, however, I am afraid this trend will come to an end. Recently, the leading group of the mass line education practice activities of the Central Party issued a notice, explicitly requiring that the clean-up and rectification of luxury and waste construction be included in the scope of activities rectification and comprehensive clean-up.

Commentary: How to treat the problem of "the wind of luxury construction"

To deal with the problem of extravagant construction, we need to abandon the idea of killing a chicken as an example, smash the lucky psychology of not complaining about others, put an end to the opportunity to scratch the ball and completely cut off from the extravagant wind.

The latest deployment of the central government reveals two important signals to control luxury construction: the era of law not blaming the public has passed, and comprehensive clean-up means abandoning the idea of "killing chickens and making an example"; It is not feasible to do what you have said unilaterally. This time, the government will continue the courage and strength to fight against the "four winds" and implement the eight regulations, leaving no chance to scratch the edge.

Looking back on the past, the reason why "building a mansion and building a landmark" converges as soon as it is cured and recurs as soon as it is loosened, actually has complex realistic logic behind it.

First of all, the concept that the law does not blame the public is at the bottom. This kind of black sheep behavior exists in the eastern, central and western regions to varying degrees. 10 years ago, according to the statistics of the Ministry of Construction, about15 of the more than 20,000 towns in China had "image projects". As long as the approval process is hidden and the office building is built, what can it do to public buildings and people? Sichuan, Guangdong and other places have set off a "cleaning storm" of luxury office buildings, but the intensity is getting weaker and weaker and the scope is getting smaller and smaller. The result of "killing chickens as an example" governance is often anticlimactic.

If you can't really strike hard, the illegal cost will be very low. Some places prefer to have policies at the top and countermeasures at the bottom. If the obvious method doesn't work, make a change. If the dark passage is blocked, it is a fait accompli. Some localities and cadres even think that as long as money is not put into their own pockets and corruption is not involved, superiors will be helpless. This has brought bad psychological hints and triggered the spread of the luxury building chain virus. In some places, even a city with a population of 50,000 has to build a square that can accommodate 60,000 people.

Luxury buildings waste public funds and erode the credibility of the government. Whether under the banner of livelihood projects or in any other name, the luxury buildings and big landmarks built by ordinary people are in their eyes, painful in their hearts and cursed in their mouths. What's more, extravagance and corruption are often a front. Feng Liucheng, the former secretary of Zhengzhou Huiji District Committee, who is famous for building a luxurious office building with the appearance of "White House", is a good example. He was later found to have taken bribes of 6.5438+0.74 million yuan in the office building project. It is conceivable that if luxury construction is allowed to grow wildly for a long time, it will only lead to more corruption conjectures and the credibility of the government will continue to be damaged.

Of course, thorough rectification needs complex and elaborate system construction, such as the supervision of extra-budgetary funds, the investigation of administrative responsibility chain, the establishment of in-vitro supervision mechanism and so on. Judging from the current situation, the first step is to punish the chaos. Only by being resolute and sweeping, not blaming the public for breaking the law, putting an end to the opportunity to play the edge ball, and completely cutting off the extravagant wind, can we strive for space and initiative for the root cause.

This knife was actually cut as early as last year. On July 20 13, the Central Office and the State Council issued the Notice on Party and Government Organs Stopping the Construction of New Buildings and Offices and Cleaning up Office Buildings. The biggest difference from the previous clean-up policy is that it is clearly stipulated that all new buildings, halls and venues will be stopped within five years, and those that have been approved but have not started construction will also be stopped. Drawing this "red line" of time is undoubtedly to put an end to all kinds of specious excuses and let the wind of luxury construction completely turn off.

Recently, the Central Committee once again stressed that hell to pay should be responsible for those who dare to commit crimes against the wind, especially those who violate discipline against the wind since the 18th CPC National Congress. Tightening the clockwork at the executive level is precisely the lesson learned from the past. Why are the masses satisfied with the current style construction? Without him, whether it is rectifying public funds for eating and drinking, free travel, or bus reform, it is unambiguous, tight and tight, fine and fine, strict and strict. Once the governance pattern of overall outflanking and resolute cutting is formed, it will surely become a thunderous trend, and if you have a bad idea, you will hit the gun yourself.

How to treat the problem of "Guo Meimei Case"?

Current affairs review background:

Recently, Guo Meimei, who became famous overnight because of her involvement in the "Red Cross", admitted in the detention center that she participated in gambling and organized gambling during the World Cup, and confessed the criminal facts of long-term participation in gambling activities and gambling for profiteering.

Comment on current affairs: How to treat the problem of "Guo Meimei Case"

Guo Meimei's case is just the tip of the iceberg of football gambling. During the World Cup, the Ministry of Public Security concentrated on detecting a number of major gambling cases, involving more than 654.38+08 billion yuan. Not long ago, the mega-online gambling case tried in Guangzhou was established more than five years ago, with a total bet of more than 484 billion yuan, while the national lottery sales in 20 13 just reached 300 billion yuan. Compared with the huge amount of money lost overseas by illegal gambling, the sales of football lottery tickets are dwarfed.

Why does the huge national wealth still flow abroad through underground gambling?

Since the start of the World Cup, various portals have spared no effort to promote Football Lottery, but they still cannot alleviate people's enthusiasm for gambling. More exciting and profitable online gambling has become the choice of some people. In today's highly prosperous mobile Internet, gambling can be completed instantly in any gambling place in the world without gambling tools, places, crowds, cash, a computer or mobile phone, and an account. Simple terminals, convenient payment, ever-changing domain names and flexible technology updates make it impossible to prevent. Gambling bookmakers are located abroad, which also causes many difficulties in law enforcement. The change of law enforcement objects requires that gambling governance should change its thinking and upgrade its means.

Gambling has a long history. In our country, both managers and ordinary people have an instinctive emotional rejection of gambling, which is considered as a bad behavior and public hazard and prohibited by legislation. However, the temptation of gambling is not small, and things with gambling nature abound in life. Gambling has two sides, just like two sides of a coin. In addition to banning and cracking down, we should also strengthen guidance so that our people can correctly treat the harm and entertainment of gambling. We can't "prevent death" at home, and at the same time let foreign bookmakers reap the profits of Chinese wealth.

At present, China only regards lottery as a means to raise public welfare funds, rather than an independent industry. From the positioning point of view, Welfare Lottery Center and Sports Lottery Center are only endowed with the function of raising public welfare funds, but not with the responsibility and obligation to protect the lottery market, avoid the loss of national wealth, and coordinate the development of tourism, games, finance, telecommunications and other related industries. The lottery issuing institutions designed under this system can meet the needs of expanding the domestic market and achieve the growth of sales performance, but they lack the motivation and means to prevent the loss of the gambling market and the outflow of national wealth.

The rampant underground gambling reflects the deviation of lottery positioning and the backwardness of gambling control means in China. According to the development situation of online gambling industry, we should improve relevant laws and management policies, upgrade the governance means of illegal gambling, promote the market-oriented reform of lottery issuing departments, and truly solve the problems of underground lottery and online gambling.

How to treat the problem of "enrollment goal"?

Current affairs review background:

A few days ago, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education held a press conference on the petition of some parents of candidates in Shenyang Conservatory of Music, reiterating that it is illegal for Shenyang Conservatory of Music to mark "within the planned quota" on the professional examination certificate of candidates, which should be considered invalid. As for whether the affected candidates can make up the record, there is no answer yet.

Comment on current affairs: How to treat the problem of "Oolong enrollment"

The initiator of the incident was Shenyang Conservatory of Music. When the school enrolls students, it promises "planned places" and adjusts the remaining enrollment plans outside the province to be used in the province, which violates the relevant provisions of the Ministry of Education that "it is not allowed to commit to admit candidates in any way before the end of the admission work", resulting in false guidance to candidates and making them unable to enroll. In this regard, Shenyang Conservatory of Music must bear the responsibility of violating the rules. But up to now, the responsibility of the school has not been investigated.

Although it has been classified as illegal, and the hidden rules of adjusting the enrollment plans of various majors at will inside and outside the province have also been made public, Shenyang Conservatory of Music claims that it did not follow the relevant policies because the staff lost and omitted the documents of the Education Department. It is difficult to convince people to excuse institutional mistakes with such reasons. According to the regulations of the Ministry of Education, the provincial admissions office is responsible for supervising the implementation of the national enrollment policy in colleges and universities and correcting violations of the national enrollment policies and regulations. Since Liaoning Education Department has determined that Shenyang Conservatory of Music is illegally enrolling students, it should thoroughly investigate the ins and outs of illegal operation, give an account to everyone, investigate the responsibilities of relevant personnel according to law, and live up to the expectations of parents and society.

For candidates who have no school, they are the victims of this illegal enrollment. If they suffer "secondary injury" because they have no remedial measures and no way to deal with the aftermath, it is obviously against the fairness of education. It is true that education administrative departments and colleges and universities must strictly follow the system and regulations to maintain the seriousness and authority of the enrollment plan. However, if the school violates the rules, the consequences cannot be borne by innocent candidates. How to give them an explanation and outlet for their anxious dreams tests the responsibility and wisdom of relevant parties.

Looking at this "enrollment oolong" storm, we must also reflect on what is the guarantee of fairness and justice in the field of education? How to solve the problem of illegal enrollment in recent years? In this incident, there are not only problems such as illegal operation and repeated delays in accountability in colleges and universities, but also many loopholes in policy implementation, such as conveying and implementing documents to adjust enrollment policies. The education department and university leaders didn't communicate face to face, didn't call, and didn't confirm receipt. Neither the Ministry of Education nor universities know whether the Ministry of Education has any special regulations on art colleges when setting the enrollment ratio of male and female students. So careless and arbitrary, aren't laws and regulations a dead letter? This shows that only by returning to the rule of law can education be truly fair. Only under the framework of the rule of law, the bottom line of educational fairness can be defended if the administrative departments of education strictly follow the law, universities and other educational institutions independently enroll students in strict accordance with the law, break the hidden rules and put an end to arbitrariness.

It is not enough to act on your own. This incident exposed the lack of rule of law at many levels such as college entrance examination enrollment and administrative supervision. It is not only a case of reflecting on educational fairness, but also highlights the urgency of making up for the lack of educational legalization. Only in strict accordance with the principles of independent enrollment of schools according to law, macro-management of the government, and social participation and supervision established by the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee can we do a good job in education on the track of the rule of law and prevent similar problems from happening again.