What do you think of Jordan chan's advocacy of defending Cantonese?

Speaking Cantonese is ancient Chinese, and the lyrics of ancient poems are written in Cantonese, which is undoubtedly absurd. Cantonese can be said to retain more remnants of ancient Chinese, so reading poems in Cantonese has a unique charm. But obviously, Cantonese is not ancient Chinese. Release the pronunciation of ancient Chinese restored by experts (in fact, it does have the taste of modern Cantonese lost), and everyone can judge for themselves. Dealing with Chinese pronunciation in China since the Song Dynasty-playing online-Youku.com, watching high-definition videos online and the so-called United Nations recognizing Cantonese as a language, or one of the six languages used in daily life. Rumors! Rumors! With so many languages in so many countries in the world, how can Cantonese be one of the six languages? It should be noted that the six daily languages of the United Nations are English, Russian, French and Western Chinese. Although Guangdong, including Hong Kong and Macao, has strong economic strength, how can He De compare with the above languages? Of course, I have reservations about the statement that Cantonese is a language. Generally speaking, what can't communicate with each other can be considered as another language. In Europe, Spanish and Portuguese are obviously two languages, but the difference between Spanish and Portuguese is actually similar to Cantonese and Mandarin. Within Spain, Castilian (what we think of as Spanish) and Galician in the north and Catalan in the west are considered as different languages. Therefore, it is not entirely unreasonable for Cantonese people to say that they are languages. Of course, we should also be soberly aware that Cantonese is still a recognized dialect in China and the United Nations today. This is also an objective fact that no one can deny. In order to identify these rumors, I would like to comment on Jordan chan's other remarks and the current actions to defend Cantonese, which have caused an uproar. In fact, what Jordan chan said is very reasonable. He said: "We respect the national policies and requirements for promoting the use of Putonghua, but the language is often not isolated. Language is the carrier of culture, and its meaning goes beyond the general communicative function. Therefore, there is no contradiction between promoting Putonghua and preserving, using and protecting dialects. " This conclusion is reasonable and well-founded, and it is also the goal of our Cantonese people to defend Cantonese. Defending Cantonese is not rejecting Mandarin! Even the Guangdong independence hat you buckled is not! The purpose of defending Cantonese is to defend local culture, not to exclude foreign culture. The value of defending Cantonese is to contribute diversity to the profound Chinese culture and make the rose bear more vivid petals! What's wrong with this simple wish Actually, it's not just Cantonese. I think Hakka, Minnan and Wu should all be protected. I think the action of defending Cantonese will also be supported by other brother provinces, so that they will cherish their local dialects. Unexpectedly, it attracted them to regard each other as enemies: we can't hear dialects there, so why do you make Guangdong special? Should we also get a dialect learning textbook? I am a black question mark. Is it wrong to defend local culture? How did you become a Guangdong college? Besides, Jordan chan mentioned that a girl from Hubei has been in Guangzhou for five years. Not only does she not speak a word of Cantonese, but she also thinks Cantonese is a "dialect without culture". "What's the use of learning?" This is the status quo of Cantonese. On the one hand, it actively responds to the national policy to learn Mandarin (which proves that defending Cantonese does not exclude Mandarin), so foreigners don't have to worry about coming to Guangzhou today, because they can live smoothly in Guangzhou without Cantonese now. On the other hand, the excessive popularization has also suppressed the local culture, leaving the impression that "Cantonese is an uncultured dialect". Actually, Cantonese is not an illiterate dialect. As a dialect with more archaic Chinese elements and an important part of China culture, Cantonese has contributed to the diversity of China culture. The purpose of popularizing Putonghua is to make the people of the whole country communicate smoothly, but now it has pushed people's culture away. Is this the original intention of promoting Putonghua? There is no conflict between promoting Putonghua and defending traditional culture! This is why we should defend Cantonese. I also hope that brother provinces all over the country can cherish their traditional culture. In fact, Jordan chan's attitude in defending Cantonese people is understandable, and his conclusion is correct. Just a few rumors were cited as examples, which attracted many people's attacks and even cursed Cantonese. But when it comes to rumors, there are actually pig teammates everywhere. Not only do you speak Cantonese, but people who oppose Cantonese also make up a lot. For example, Wuyang Primary School distributed Cantonese textbooks, which were originally used as interest courses and elective courses. However, it has become a compulsory course in Wuyang primary school, and it has become that Wuyang primary school teaches in Cantonese instead of Mandarin, and it has become that Wuyang primary school prohibits students from using Mandarin, which violates national policies. Traditionally, after criticizing absurd rumors, it is the turn to criticize Cantonese later. So should we also criticize Putonghua? Obviously not. In the face of pig teammates, we consciously refute rumors, but our initial intention of defending local culture, defending national unity and supporting the promotion of Putonghua to facilitate people's exchanges remains unchanged. Finally, a picture is presented to the sprayer.