Deny why Zhuge Liang and Yi Zhongtian are not good at the Three Kingdoms.

In fact, Yi Zhongtian's evaluation of Zhuge Liang mainly followed the "conclusion" of many historians, that is, Zhuge Liang was a great politician, not an outstanding strategist. Of course, he totally denied the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the myth of Zhuge Liang circulated among the people, and even regarded the "trick up his sleeve" as a joke, denying Zhuge Liang's wisdom and thinking that it was a folk fabrication. Is Zhuge Liang a strategist or a politician? This is indeed a debatable topic. Personally, I think Zhuge Liang is a great strategist and strategist first, and then an outstanding politician. The reasons are as follows: First, as a strategist in troubled times and a fruitful "strategist", we must have a unique, keen and abnormal strategic vision. This is enough for us to appreciate Zhuge Liang's unprecedented strategic vision from Longzhong Dui. Secondly, Liu Bei is a man who has suffered many defeats and wars. Although there are Liu, Guan, Zhang and Zhao, it still does not help. Until Zhuge Liang came out of the mountain and turned Gan Kun into the overlord, and then divided the world into three parts. Among them, Zhuge Liang's military ability is the most important factor of his success. Finally, Zhuge Liang's political talent is actually far less than his military talent. In the later governance of Shu, if Zhuge Liang didn't "do what he knows he can't do" and didn't want to continue fighting, but shared weal and woe with the people to adapt to the times, then Shu could not have been consuming strength in the war and eventually failed. "Since ancient times, soldiers are not good at fighting, and those who govern Shu should think deeply." So Zhuge Liang is a great strategist and strategist first, and a better politician second. 1. Throughout history, Zhuge Liang's romance and common people have been highly esteemed and even deified. This is an intellectual in China, and it is absolutely not allowed, because the intellectuals in China are the most conceited, and they usually have the problem of giving up others. What they can't do, let alone others. What Zhuge Liang can do is simply a miracle in mythology. Those so-called "intellectuals". So, are there super smart people in the world? The answer is certainly yes: in fact, according to the "28 Law" of Napoleon Hill, a successful American scholar, many so-called outstanding "intellectuals" really belong to the top 20%. However, if the 28-28 Law is divided into 28 points, and the 28-28 Law is further divided into 28 points, then there will be very few outstanding people who are truly outstanding, and how many people are truly fascinated in history? Why are you jealous of such a great man? Can you improve your value by denying those great people? Second, since history, intellectuals in China like to go with the flow, join in the fun, like fame and fortune, and few people can really keep their true colors. Few people can really stand loneliness and really make unremitting efforts for learning and seeking knowledge. Therefore, there are very few intellectuals who have really made great achievements in China, and many of them stay on the surface. According to Einstein, "they all like to drill a hole in the thinnest part of the board." But indulging in the so-called "achievements" and enjoying the so-called "due treatment" is really the sorrow of China intellectuals. This is indeed the sorrow of intellectuals. Most intellectuals in reality belong to this category. Of course, there are real scholars, but there are too few, and Zhuge Liang's style of reading extensively and traveling around the world to understand the world is even more harmful to those scholars. Third, Zhuge Liang's "ignorance of the times": In the eyes of many intellectuals, in that era, since Cao Cao had destroyed the North, it was up to Cao Cao to unify and transform the world. Zhuge Liang has too many things to do. Why should he work for a wandering Liu Bei? In the eyes of many intellectuals today, since the United States is the "most powerful" country in the world, it is both democratic and free. How good is it for the United States to unify the earth? Therefore, in the process of the United States launching wars of aggression again and again under the guise of "freedom and democracy", China has so many so-called elites "applauding", but thinks that those nations that resist the aggressors are too "stupid"; Therefore, they like to be worms that go with the flow; Fourth, according to the idea of biological evolution, future generations should be smarter than their predecessors. Therefore, in the eyes of many intellectuals, Zhuge Liang should be less clever and more stupid than them. But many people will never understand that biological evolution is real. However, intelligence is not equal to wisdom, and true great wisdom is even more difficult to achieve. First, we must have the desire to keep learning, and second, we must really read a lot and understand all kinds of ideas in the world. Only then can we talk about creating new correct thinking and leading the world and the trend of the times. How many people can really do this for flashy, bloated and grandiose intellectuals? Frankly speaking, I don't think Zhuge Liang is a perfect person who is deified. As the preface says, there are mistakes and mistakes, which are also the places that future generations should learn from. But on the whole, Zhuge Liang is indeed one of the most outstanding militarists, strategists and politicians in the history of China. There is no doubt about it. Future generations can comment on Zhuge Liang, but they should be objective and fair and learn the way to success. What I really want to say is that China intellectuals should have a broad and inclusive mentality, the will to "keep learning" and the spirit to make continuous efforts for real achievements, instead of staying at the low-level stage of "paying lip service", let alone trying to distort and deny history, which is stupid!