How to accurately estimate college entrance examination scores?

The application process is about to begin. In order to help candidates accurately estimate their scores and choose schools reasonably, yesterday, the reporter specially asked senior teachers from Guiyang No. 1 Middle School, Guiyang Normal University High School and Guiyang No. 9 Middle School to talk about it. Some tips on scoring and issues that should be paid attention to.

Mathematics: Deng Lianqi

(Special teacher of mathematics in Guiyang No. 1 Middle School)

When estimating scores for objective questions, it is important to accurately distinguish between reliable scores and soft scores . Teacher Deng believes that answers that are certain can be called reliable points, while answers that are vague and cannot be remembered are soft points.

For the subjective questions, Teacher Deng suggested that candidates should evaluate their scores from the following three aspects:

1. When answering the questions, the reasoning process and calculation results are completely consistent with the scoring standards. This question will get full marks, which is a reliable score.

2. If you only complete a certain part and it is consistent with the scoring standards, then that part can be scored.

3. Only certain steps have been done, and the reasoning process and scoring standards are similar. The corresponding score can be estimated based on the similarity of the answers.

At the same time, when calculating the total score, Teacher Deng proposed the following reference method for the students:

1. Reliable score + soft score estimate = highest score;

2. Reliability score + 1/2 soft score = the middle score of the estimated score;

3. Reliable score = the lowest score of the estimated score.

Teacher Deng suggested that students should refer to the middle score when filling in their first choice, and it is safer to use the lowest score when filling in parallel choices.

Chinese: Wu Xiaolin

(Special-level Chinese teacher at Guiyang No. 1 Middle School)

For the Chinese subject, Teacher Wu believes that the most important thing is the accurate assessment of the composition part. . Teacher Wu mainly made suggestions for the candidates from the following aspects:

1. Those whose word count reaches the standard, language expression is fluent, citation of materials is accurate, and the composition structure is complete can probably be estimated to be about 46 points.

2. In addition to the above characteristics, essays that also have the characteristics of substantial materials, expressive language and literary talent can be estimated to be around 50 points. This category of candidates belongs to candidates who succeed in language. There is also a category of candidates who succeed in analysis, which can also be estimated to be around 50 points. Success in analysis is mainly reflected in: looking at problems deeply and thoroughly, and being able to see the essence through phenomena.

3. Those who have quick thinking, fluent language expression, literary talent, and a comprehensive and profound view of the problem can be estimated at around 55 points.

English: Wu Youping

(Senior English teacher at the High School Affiliated to Your Normal University)

The main factor that increases the score of the English test paper is the composition. If the candidates can remember If you can recall the content of the essay you write and can probably recall the question stems and write down the essay silently, and then give your English teacher guidance and grading, it will be more conducive to the candidates' score evaluation. If the candidate cannot recall the content framework and main structure of his composition, he can estimate an average score based on his usual English composition score in the mock test.

History: Zeng Qiang

(Senior teacher of history at Guiyang No. 1 Middle School)

Teacher Zeng suggested that students should carefully compare the scores for the history subject Standard answers, and follow the principle of "stepping on points" to score points. No points will be scored if there are no points. Do not estimate the points vaguely.

At the same time, Teacher Zeng also put forward the following score estimation suggestions for the subjective questions in this year's test questions, which are difficult for candidates to accurately estimate.

For example: Question 38 No. 1, if the answer contains "oppression" and similar expressions, you can get points. If the answer is "class", you will basically not get points. Question 2 has two points. If the answer is "connected" or "interconnected" or similar expressions, 2 points can be considered. If you answer relevant expressions such as "prerequisites" and "sequential relationships", you may be considered for 3 points. For the third question, 2 points will be considered for answers such as "oneself want independence and liberation", and 3 points will be considered for answers such as "the emergence of ideological trends against nationalism". Question 4: If you answer the content of Sun Yat-sen's thought of allying with Russia, you will be given 4 points. If you answer the reason, you will be given 4 points. Question 5: 5 points can be considered for the understanding of globalization. 5 points can be considered for the understanding of nationalism in the context of globalization, if the views are correct and the expression is complete.

40 questions, the background of question 1 includes 2 historical facts. The correct answer to "opening of new sea routes" can be considered to be worth 2 points, and the "colonial activities" can be considered to be worth 3 points.

Question 2: For correct answers to "changing the food structure" and related statements in the materials, 2 points may be considered. "Relieving food pressure" can be considered to be worth 3 points. For question 3, the two scoring points for "Consequences" are 2 points each, and the "Cause" must answer at least 3 scoring points to get an estimate of 6 points.

Politics: He Shimin

(First-level teacher of Guiyang No. 9 Middle School)

Since the language expressions of the candidates are different, the answers may not be consistent with the standard The answers are consistent. As long as the candidates use the main professional knowledge and professional terminology to answer the questions, and the answers are consistent with the meaning of the questions, they will receive appropriate points.

For example, question 39 has a total score of ***32 points and requires candidates to answer the question from the perspectives of economics, political science and philosophy. From an economic point of view, the key points in answering the questions lie in three aspects: "rural economic development", "rural cooperative medical system" and "positive effect". Candidates need to answer questions including: solving farmers' health, improving labor productivity, improving farmers' welfare, narrowing the gap between rich and poor, and helping to guide farmers to establish a mutual aid economy and risk awareness.

The key words in the second question of Question 39 are "party", "government" and "peasant masses". The key words in the third question are "contradiction analysis method" and "the main contradiction in the primary stage of socialism", and the focus is on "meaning". Some candidates only focus on "the main and secondary aspects of the contradiction" when answering the question, but ignore "What is the main content of the primary stage of socialism?" Therefore, they will lose points.

Geography: Yin Chaohua

(Senior teacher of geography at Guiyang No. 1 Middle School)

Teacher Yin believes that the key point in the evaluation of geography subjects is the subjective part accurate assessment. Regarding some of the subjective questions in this year's test questions that are difficult for candidates to accurately estimate their scores, Teacher Yin put forward the following suggestions for candidates' reference.

For example: Question 1 of 36, five activity areas, 1 point will be awarded for each correct code name, and 2 points will be awarded for explaining the correct reason. In addition to the standard answer to this question, if the candidate answers "downstream of the river" or "downwind zone of prevailing wind" or "upwind zone of minimum wind frequency", 2 points can be considered for estimation. Question 2 emphasizes that the water quality in the upper reaches of the river is good, so it can be estimated as 2 points. Question 5, if the emphasis is on the isolation belt or protective belt, it can be estimated as 2 points.

For 40 questions, if you answer the 5th blank of the 4th sub-question "Summer is hot and rainy", you can get 3 points. If you only answer "Summer has a lot of precipitation", it is recommended to get 2 points. If you answer the 6th blank of this sub-question, The answer is Songnen Plain. If the answer is "Songliao Plain", it can also be estimated at 2 points. Question 5 has the second blank, and the standard answer is 82.6%. If the answer is 82.1%-83%, it is recommended to be evaluated as 2 points. The third question is the third blank, and the standard answer is 0.28%. If the answer is 0.25%-0.3%, It is recommended to rate it at 2 points.

Chemistry: Yu Zhongliang

(Senior Chemistry Teacher at Guiyang No. 1 Middle School)

"Accurate scoring of non-choice questions is the key to scoring in chemistry." Teacher Yu suggested that students should evaluate their scores based on the standard answers and the following scoring standards.

For example: 26 questions have 6 sub-questions and 9 questions, among which the 3 blanks in the first sub-question are worth 1 point each, and the 6 questions in the following 5 small questions are worth 2 points each.

There are 27 questions with 2 questions and 5 blanks. Each blank can be estimated at 3 points.

There are 4 blanks in the 28 questions and 4 questions. Question 1 is worth 3 points. Questions 2, 3, and 4 are more difficult, so each question is worth 4 points. Among them, questions 2 and 3 are worth 4 points. Each question has 2 answer points, each worth 2 points.

Biology: Zhou Jianghui

(Senior teacher of biology at No. 1 Middle School in Guiyang)

The subjective questions in the biology paper (2) usually raise questions arising from the analysis of different phenomena. The reason is that when candidates answer questions, as long as the analysis is correct and the text description is clear, they can still score points even if the text description of the answer is different.

For example, in question 31, the amount of written text is small, and the answer form of the question is a genetic expression. What needs to be specially explained here is the answer to the first and second blanks of question 1. The order can be reversed. The answer to "27:9:9:9:3:3:3:1" can be divided into points, that is, writing part of it will get a part of the score. The rest of the answers are not much different from the reference answers.

There is no need to be too hard on the subjective part of the biology questions in terms of scoring. You can score once the main meaning is expressed.

Physics: Jin Zhongxin

(Leader of the teaching and research group of the Department of Physics of your Normal University)

Candidates must be free from any interference when evaluating scores. Next, as a teacher, judge the "copied paper" you answered after the test, so that you can give your test paper a score that is basically close to the college entrance examination score in a more "fair" manner.

According to the practice of previous years, when scoring calculation questions, points are given step by step. The main steps to answer the questions have been listed in the scoring standards. Generally, each step has a key formula calculation result. , these formulas and calculation results are the key to scoring. When evaluating scores, you must make sure whether you have these key formulas and calculation results.

1. If your problem-solving method is different from the scoring standard, then the final result is very important. If the method and process are correct and the result is correct, you will get full marks; but if the result is wrong Yes, then some points will be deducted. Generally speaking, if the final answer to a test question appears in the form of numbers plus units, if the result expressed in letters appears or the answer is incomplete, about 1/4 of the total score of the test question will be deducted.

2. If the problem-solving method is the same as the scoring standard and the process is the same, but an error occurs at the beginning and the error does not affect other steps, then according to the practice of previous years, no points will be accumulated, that is, only points will be deducted Calculate error score.

3. If the candidate’s solution process is not exactly the same as the reference answer, but as long as the method is correct, points can be awarded according to the principle of “equal points”. If a comprehensive expression written by a candidate has exactly the same meaning as the three expressions in the reference answer, points for the three expressions can be awarded.

4. If there is no description and only some mathematical expressions, even if the intermediate equation and final result are consistent with the reference answer, at least one-fifth of the score for this question will be deducted. (