It is not objective to belittle and flatter the Wotou Guild Hall of Deyun Society, a successful ordinary Shang Yan. what do you think?

The performance of the German version of Wotou Guild Hall was full of twists and turns. Due to various objective reasons, some viewers bought tickets and then returned them. I bought it again when I came back. It didn't come for nothing at last. Interestingly, when the Wotou Guild Hall of Deyun Society was officially launched, the evaluation of this version of the drama on the Internet was polarized. Some viewers think that "the thief played by Degang Guo Yu Qian is good", while others think that "it's too strong to listen to cross talk after watching it for a long time".

Some viewers think that "Yuan Jiangmiao played by Zhang Jiuling is too hip-pulling", while others think that "Zhang Jiuling plays very well". Some viewers think that "the atmosphere is touching", some viewers think that "the scene is messy and disturbing the people like cross talk Shang Yan", some viewers think that "Degang Guo saved the drama" and some viewers think that "Deyun Society makes money with drama". There are many teams that have performed in Wotou Guild Hall, but the performance that can cause such polarization evaluation is estimated to be Deyun Society. How should we evaluate Wotou Guild Hall published by Deyun Society?

1. What is the fundamental purpose of Shang Yan Deyun Society's successful rehearsal of Wotou Guild Hall? Some people say that it is to promote drama, which can be regarded as a piggyback purpose. In fact, everyone knows the fundamental purpose, selling tickets.

Compared with the five-star version of Wotou Club (He Bing, Pu Cunxin, Yang Lixin, Song Dandan and Xu Fan), the ticket price of Wotou Club announced by Deyun Society is obviously much higher. The key is that the sales situation is as short as the five-star version of Renyi. Since Renyi Edition can make money, the profit of Wotou Club published by Deyun Society will be quite rich.

The fundamental purpose of commercial performance is to make profits, and to maximize profits as much as possible. Judging from the current situation, the Wotou Guild Hall of Deyun Society has obviously achieved the fundamental purpose of Shang Yan. So judging from the box office, the Wotou Club of Deyun Society should be a successful Shang Yan.

Second, the "Wotou Guild Hall" in ordinary Shang Yan has had many team performances since the five-star edition of People's Art, and Deyun Society is just one of them, which is not exclusive or original. This is one of them.

Besides, can the level of Wotou Guild Hall published by Deyun Society exceed the five-star version of People's Art? Obviously, this is impossible. Degang Guo, Yu Qian and lorla may all have good performance experience, which can also be mentioned, especially lorla and Da Tsing Yi. The gap between other actors such as Zhang Jiuling, Luan, Yang Jiulang and Yang Hetong. And there are obviously many actors in the People's Art Edition, especially Zhang Jiuling. Hao Jing (Xiao Chuang, out of court) plays Yuan Jiangmiao in the People's Art Edition of Wotou Club, with strong lines and emotional control. According to the live performance, Yuan Jiangmiao in Zhang Jiuling is eight blocks away from Hao Jing's version.

Just kidding, if the Deyun Wotou Club really surpasses the five-star version of People's Art as fans say, then Beijing People's Art can be declared closed. To tell the truth, the completion of Wotou Guild Hall by Deyun Society is quite acceptable, but its overall performance level is most suitable in two words: ordinary. Don't think that the word "ordinary" is derogatory, and the five-star version of Wotou Guild Hall is the first. By contrast, it is good that the version of Wotou Guild Hall by Deyun Society can have a "general" evaluation, at least it is much more reliable than the History of China Crosstalk by Deyun Society.

Third, don't flatter too much. Since the Wotou Guild Hall of Deyun Society is an ordinary Shang Yan, why is there so much flattery? What about "saving the play" and "promoting the play"? It seems that every performance is a free welfare. In fact, the coincidence rate between the audience of Wotou Club published by Deyun Society and the audience of Wotou Club published by Renyi and other teams is quite low, and the audience of Renyi Edition generally won't go to Deyun Society Edition. Similarly, the audience of Wotou Club published by Deyun Society generally don't go to Renyi Edition.

To put it bluntly, the audience of the Wotou Club of Deyun Society is still their own fans, which is also the greatest guarantee for the success of the performance. No one can say whether Shang Yan will succeed if a drama team plays Wotou Hall instead of an artist. Anyway, it is difficult for her box office to compete with Deyun PK.

Since the audience is mainly fans of Deyun Society, it is not surprising that there are many over-touted views on the Internet. In my opinion, this kind of over-praise, which is divorced from artistic laws and facts, is best left in the fan group, and it is reasonable to blow love beans to the sky in the rice circle world. In fact, the rice circle group did the same, otherwise there would not be such a big joke as "Guo Qilin memorized twenty-four histories in a summer vacation".

However, once the excessive touting of the taste of rice circles spreads to public spaces such as the online world, it will arouse the resentment of many passers-by, which is not good for the audience of Deyun Society. After all, Deyun Society can't live by fans alone.

Fourth, it should not be belittled too much. The author also disagrees with some comments on the Internet that belittle the Wotou Guild Hall of Deyun Society. For example, some people say that "Deyun Society generally has a low level of education and can't read". This extreme and one-sided view, like excessive flattery, is obviously divorced from the artistic law.

Although the fundamental purpose of the Deyun version of Wotou Club is to make money, and the main body of the harvest is also its own fans, objectively speaking, the Deyun version of Wotou Club has indeed spread the drama art to a certain extent and promoted the drama market to a certain extent. This catfish effect should not be denied.

Moreover, as a mature drama, Wotou Guild Hall does not have to be based on the People's Art Edition. There are many funny and even "dirty" contents in the lines of this play, which is very suitable for Deyun Society to perform. As far as the funny effect is concerned, it is also an attempt to compare the human art version, and other teams can also take the Deyun Society version of Wotou Club as a reference.

It's like the crosstalk industry in Degang Guo. Although Degang Guo deviated from the development direction of crosstalk art to some extent, the crosstalk industry also recognized Degang Guo's ability to drive the market. The same is true of the Beijing Opera industry. Although Degang Guo has brought some controversy to the Beijing Opera circle, objectively, he did drive a part of the Beijing Opera market. Therefore, from the perspective of the market and the industry as a whole, the advantages of Wotou Guild Hall released by Deyun Society definitely outweigh the disadvantages, and the excessively belittling remarks are not objective.

To sum up, the fundamental reasons for the evaluation polarization of Wotou Guild Hall published by Deyun Society are rice circle thinking and black powder thinking. Rice circles are only good, but black powder is the opposite. Because of the problem of preset position, it is naturally difficult to face two viewpoints objectively. For passers-by and spectators, of course, we should also have the ability and vigilance to distinguish between the views of rice circles and black powder, and should not be easily brought into the rhythm.