What do you think of Yang Lixin’s criticism of student audiences bursting into laughter when watching “Thunderstorm”?

The laughter in the "public welfare field" (that is, the student field) criticized by Yang Lixin should be a generation gap issue.

As Yang Lixin said, "I thought that such a tragic tragedy that happened in the 1920s would move these students who live in happiness today." A brother and sister in "Thunderstorm" The plot of incest and debt repaid by father and son would be a bloody drama and a weird drama in today's Weibo era. Zhou Chong's innocence was regarded as an idiot, and Zhou Ping's weakness in the face of Fanyi was regarded as a coward. It's a tragedy. Treat it as a comedy...

The audience seems to apply their own values ????to the plot of Thunderstorm, and watch the drama according to the characters and plots they want. Naturally, they will find brother-sister incest funny. , bloody, and the characters involved can naturally arouse the laughter that the audience has come to expect from comedy.

As a person who has participated in drama production and performance, any reaction from the audience should be feedback on the performance. If you laugh where you shouldn't laugh, it should be the actor's way of performing or the director. There is a problem with the way it is handled. The problem lies in the discrepancy between presentation and acceptance. Usually, we reflect and adjust our performances based on the audience's feedback based on the actual situation in order to achieve the most appropriate presentation. Blindly criticizing the audience is self-deception and does not conform to our wishes.

However, actors cannot be coerced by the audience, and the audience may not always be right. Values ??cannot be unified in art. Individuals always have their own opinions. If you ignore the audience's feedback, it will only become vulgar culture and become a tool for others to take advantage of.

Yang Lixin’s criticism was caused by the “public welfare field” that led to laughter, because the main audience of the public welfare field is students, and young people have no reverence and admiration for old classics, which does not mean that classics should be I am in awe and adoration, but I think that since you choose to come to Renyi to watch a play, and choose this version of a play with actors and stage design, you should give the performers the minimum respect. You may not like this version of "Thunderstorm", the way the characters express themselves, or the beauty of the choreography, but you must not treat the actors performing on the stage with a non-serious attitude. If you are here to watch the jokes in "Thunderstorm", then you can stay away from Renyi.

The audience watching the drama is not an ordinary audience, but the audience can be cultivated. The "Public Welfare Field" is to cultivate young audiences and cultivate the etiquette and appreciation level of young audiences watching dramas. Yang Lixin's "performance strike" should be a temporary remark. Charity venues will continue to be the norm and there will be more. However, the "dissatisfaction" of old artists with charity venues should also be long-standing. In this culturally integrated society, only tolerance can eliminate conflicts.

Actors and audiences should respect each other and have different artistic values, so they will have different opinions. But if we just blame each other for problems that should not exist, we will not be able to achieve mutual understanding. In this regard, I very much agree with Yang Lixin's attitude. You don't have to like my performance, and I have the right not to perform.