Why are dogs most like humans?

Question 1: Why do dogs understand human nature? A dog's IQ is equivalent to that of a 3-4-year-old child. It knows something.

Question 2: Why are dogs human? In fact, it is not clear whether dogs are real humans. Dogs just have their own way of thinking to judge and respond to the gestures you usually make to them. You have a saying, what kind of dog does the owner keep? If you regard it as a dispensable pet, you are wrong. Dogs need the care and care of their owners just like children. After all, they have been with you since childhood. You are its role model.

Question 3: Why do dogs understand human nature and all dogs understand human nature? No matter what dog gets along with people for a long time, it has feelings and will recognize people.

Question 4: Why are dogs so considerate?

Question 5: Why do puppies understand human nature? I have seen a program that dogs are domesticated by wolves and have many similar habits, but wolves whine and dogs bark. Studies show that dogs want to communicate with their owners and evolve slowly. Dogs have been serving mankind since they were domesticated. If they are not humane enough, they will naturally be eliminated and their genes will not be passed on. So now dogs are more and more like people.

Question 6: What kind of dog is the best and most human? Push your blond hair hard.

Whether it is good or human depends mainly on whether the owner has trained the dog well.

Dogs in the top fifteen are good choices.

1. Border collie 2. Poodle 3. German shepherd dog 4. Golden hair 5. Du Binquan 6. Hilti (Shepherd of Kadeland) 7. Labrador retriever. Butterfly dog 9. Rottweiler 10. Cattle and dogs in Australia.

1 1. Welsh corky 12. Mini Schnauzer 13 British Bouncing Hound 14. Belgian Teflon 15 spike/Billy Shepherd 16. Scottish shepherd 17. German short hair.

Question 7: Why are dogs the most human-like animals? In fact, sometimes, as a human being, how much better than a dog? To be smart, it's just that humans are good at defense and cover-up, while dogs have always kept silent. Dogs are the most loyal, and loyalty is shameful. Loving dogs is love, and it has nothing to do with wealth and poverty. As long as you are its owner, it will never leave. The word "betrayal" was invented by human beings, and it was also faithfully implemented. This situation is still happening to dogs and their owners around us. Think twice before raising, and be serious and responsible after raising. Maybe you really have irresistible external force and can't fulfill your promise to the dog. Then when you find someone to adopt him, please put him in the perspective of your family, instead of solving him with a burden or trouble. The story of a Tibetan mastiff: A Tibetan herdsman's mother mastiff gave birth to five cubs. She was afraid that she could not raise so many, so she obviously abandoned the weakest birthmark in the wild. A few years later, his family was attacked by wolves, and several Tibetan mastiffs in the family fought fiercely with the wolves, but they were outnumbered and died one after another. When the wolves took a break to attack his house again, suddenly, like a flash of lightning, a Tibetan mastiff was killed and fought with the wolves, and finally the wolves were repelled. The herdsmen realized that this dog with obvious birthmark turned out to be the one they abandoned a few years ago, and they couldn't help kneeling and crying. The badly injured dog turned around the herdsmen's tent several times, dragged his injured leg back and disappeared into the wilderness. This is the dog's character! More often, the attitude towards dogs is actually considering our conscience.

Question 8: Dogs know human nature. Why don't people understand human nature? In my opinion, people are born with no distinction between good and evil.

I can't deny that children wet the bed, but it's not evil. It is undeniable that children will kiss their parents, but this is not good. The so-called evil and good are the specific characters formed by people in a specific environment. This does not mean that I was evil or good when I was a child. The theory that human nature is good and evil is wrong.

When a person is born, his eyes are closed, and the scenery outside does not enter his young mind at all. At this time, all the children can show are instinctive reactions, such as breastfeeding, sleeping, or waving. Of course, we can't say that breastfeeding is evil. If so, there will be no good people in the world. Then, in this case, the theory that human nature is evil is of course untenable. Children are evil, where is evil? Breastfeeding or sleeping? I don't know how the theory of inherent pair came into being. If human nature is evil, then those who advocate the theory of human nature are probably evil. Should we believe what the wicked say? Of course not.

Of course, this does not mean that human nature is good, which is also wrong. Still that example, human nature is good, where is the good? Breastfeeding or sleeping? If human nature is good, then those who preach that human nature is good are probably good. In that case, why not be a good person again and let the inherent bad habits speak freely? If you ask why, it's because you are kind. Since you are kind, there is no need to be competitive and abusive. What is the definition of kindness? If it is good not to curse, not to fight, to help others, to unite and be friendly, then what is good about people who preach the theory of human nature? How can you convince others that human nature is good if you are not good yourself?

I am a materialist and believe in objectivity. Anything that is not objective or divorced from objective is inaccurate. The theory that human nature is evil and human nature is good is wrong to look at others from its own perspective. To understand others, we must first understand ourselves. The propagandists of the theory that human nature is good and evil don't even understand themselves. How can they understand others?

When you are not sure whether your speech is right or wrong, you can't publish it. Even if it is published, it can only be called a joke, and it can never be called philosophy. Because the definition of philosophy is truth.