Which is better, Duncan or Garnett? Give a reason!

It's just luck that Duncan is better than Garnett "—————————"

There are KG fans. Say it again.

The last time we heard this sound was in the summer of 2004. That year, the three-headed monster led the Timberwolves to the first place in the western regular season, the best record ever.

Is it really just luck? Actually, it is not.

Throwing three points, I watched fewer Celtic games this year, and watched more Wolves games before. Garnett dare not comment now, but he should talk about the former Wolf King.

Since 2000, power forward has replaced center in the 1990s, becoming the most competitive position in the league. Duncan and Garnett have always been easy to compare. Especially when sharks dominate everything, their fate seems to be the same. But the stubborn Duncan chose to fight in the restricted area, and the "smart" Garnett chose the elegant perimeter.

Thus, in 2003, two people began to widen the gap. Duncan led the general who could only play 15 to 20 minutes, and the French and Argentines in the first and second years eliminated the powerful Lakers step by step, defeating the same great Kidd 4-2 and winning the championship. David stern, the president of NBA, didn't even have to pronounce the name when he announced the winner of the finals MVP at the award ceremony after the game, because Duncan seemed to have won the MVP award for the whole season. NBA official website analyzed Duncan's all-around performance in the last game with four clear paragraphs in the post-game commentary. These four clues are "Do you need to score?" "Do you need to rebound?" "Do you need to pass the ball?" "Do you need to defend?" In other words, Duncan's huge palm has covered all the venues of the stadium, while the clever Garnett was taken away by the powerful shark calmly. All this is just the beginning of change.

In 2004, Garnett played the best personal and team record, dragging the limelight to himself. In fact, the success of Wolves in that year was not driven by Garnett's outstanding performance, nor was it the birth of two other monsters, but the result of the extensive use of defense in the restricted area in 2004. At that time, Pacers and Wolves were the two best defensive teams in the restricted area, while the tough guy Shark, stubborn Duncan and Wallace were still defending the inside with their own personal defense. Wolves and Pacers took the lead in applying defense, only because they saw that the leaders of the two teams were soft, so they had to use defense to stop the other team's inside line from raging in their own restricted area. Everyone should know that there is a difference between regional defense in NBA and defense in international competitions. The defense of NBA is not perfect, and it is easy to be caught after a long time. This is also the reason why the relationship between wolves and walkers is in a slump after a season of scenery.

What really separated two people was 2005. Injuries, contracts and regional defense were interpreted, which led to the Wolves missing the playoffs. However, under Duncan's leadership, the Spurs won the championship again, although they were two great rivals, Sun and Pistons. Duncan also won his third MVP trophy and the title of "No.1 in history". While the clever Garnett is still roaring and even scolding his teammates with beautiful data, the stubborn Duncan has stepped into the level of big bird magician step by step. Since then, the name of the second top player in the league (at least in the regular season) has been occupied by Dirk instead of Garnett.

A man chose stubborn persistence, so he is Duncan.

The other one chose a clever escape, so he was Garnett.

Looking at the whole career. Although not as good as Duncan, Garnett's career data is still very beautiful. The two of them got two pairs, no, exactly 20+ 10, which was a piece of cake. But in my opinion, there is still a difference between them scoring and rebounding.

First of all, the stability of the data, Garnett is definitely not as stable as Duncan. In character, Garnett is warm but calm, but Duncan has always been able to keep a cool head. In the way of playing, Duncan, who is closer to the basket, is more likely to keep his shooting rate, and Garnett's shooting rate is as elegant as his playing.

Then talk about the moisture of the data. In a word that is easy to attract criticism, Garnett's data is still not small, at least in the Wolves. In terms of scoring, Garnett will enjoy a certain number of shots when the team is 20 points ahead or 20 points behind. Wolves and cattle, horses and sheep are often seen to be 30 points behind at the end of the third quarter, but Garnett still made more than ten shots in the last quarter. To put it mildly, you never give up. To put it mildly, it's really a brush. And there is more water on the backboard. I believe Wolves fans will also notice that Garnett is a teammate's card when he rebounds in the backcourt, and only he jumps up. . . . .

Third, let's talk about the quality of data. There are two kinds of key players in NBA, one is the last moment that decides life and death, and the other is the key game that can win or lose. The former is a killer like McGrady and Kobe Bryant, and the latter is naturally the first to promote Duncan. As you can see, the process must be very difficult in all Duncan's high data competitions. For example, in this year's playoffs, the 38 points 17 rebounds and 9 blocks against the Suns, everyone may have forgotten that the three points of the Spurs in the first three quarters that day were 2 points of 14. Garnett's performance in key games is obviously not as good as Duncan's, so Garnett has only won two series so far (both in 2004), against the Nuggets and Kings respectively. Garnett has not won the Lakers Spurs, a real playoff team.

A truly great player is someone who needs Duncan to stand up and play the role of backer in the most difficult moment of the team. However, KG is more dependent on the feel and height to float on the outside. If he feels good, it will be easy to win, but when all the players feel cold, his play really doesn't play a decisive role. The biggest difference between Garnett and Duncan is that one is icing on the cake, and the other is a timely help. So Finley went to Duncan, Gloves and Malone went to the shark. And Garnett went to the Celtics to find PP~~

So Duncan is Duncan, Garnett or Garnett.

Duncan has been a role model for players since he entered the NBA. He is the coach's favorite, the general's demeanor, the wise man's fool, flashy. This series of compliments is always endless, and he never smiles. Many people have noticed Duncan's amazing wisdom under his wooden appearance.

At least Garnett understands. So he clashed with Duncan again and again, and he went all out against the Spurs every time. We can even guess how much Garnett pays attention to the comparison with Duncan in data and win or lose in the contest. Because Garnett is also a smart man, he knows what a great opponent Duncan is.

When Garnett put Duncan's projection on the rebound, he roared impudently, ignoring his teammates' congratulations, because it was his own victory. When Duncan threw the winning goal into the basket and caused Garnett to foul, he silently walked to the free throw line and high-fived his teammates, because he knew that this was the first round of the playoffs that year and there were stronger opponents behind him.

So Duncan won the championship and finals MVP. So Duncan won more honors and more championships.

Garnett also achieved the same data as Duncan, and had more fans than Duncan, but the champion never belonged to him.

So Duncan is Duncan, Garnett or Garnett Duncan and KG have completely different styles. Besides, LZ is only talking about a half-court game. KG struggled for so long that he didn't have any good help before going to Boston. It can be said that it is "broken for a long time, good for a long time" among teammates. But what about Duncan? He found Argentine and French, and many experienced people helped him. This may be the reason why more people like KG than Duncan. He grabbed the board, "the teammate's card was robbed by KG", which is the most ridiculous one of all NBA jokes I have ever heard. No one will question KG's board of directors and his leadership. I have watched the NBA for so long, and there is definitely not much KG on the outside. After I arrived in Boston, there was a bottom line for investment.

What about the spurs? At present, there is only a poor 67.6%, and there is no doubt that the western champion is absolutely out.

KG has had enough, he can't stand it any longer, and the green shirts will endure it in the playoffs.

By the way, did everyone play NBA2008?

The ability score of KG is 97, and Duncan seems to be only 9 1.