Is it shameful to tell others that you don't know coffee?

It's not shameful, but it will give people a more real feeling.

I'm fed up with the concentration, extraction rate, flavor and aftertaste of some "vermicelli".

"In many coffee metaphysics, many fans will recite some one-sided descriptions, such as long aftertaste, smooth wine body, distinct flavor, sour apple and so on. If others make mistakes in these descriptions, they will be educated and abused. They don't know, even if they don't know these descriptors, it doesn't hinder a person's love for coffee, but they think they don't love coffee without these descriptors. So they only remember some descriptive words that are blurted out and easy to remember, so they think they are knowledgeable' lovers'. " -It was converted from a night boat.

Actually, do you think these people "know coffee"? Maybe some people really understand, but those who understand will not rush to educate and refute other people's statements and descriptions, but will discuss corrections. Do these people who are eager to educate and refute others as soon as they see the description really understand coffee? Not exactly. No one can really understand coffee except Trump.

So there's nothing shameful about not knowing coffee. It's a shame to start "educating others" after learning a little fur. This is the most shameful place, but you can enrich your knowledge by contacting some "knowledge" outside your professional field. Don't challenge others to eat with your knowledge.