What do China people think about being a lawyer at present?

Think about the lawyer and run!

My brother is a lawyer, very good! ! !

The following is the information.

Explore my own flight!

Chasing that perfect world!

These three points all have futuristic thinking and strong enterprising color, but they are basically a stage of abandonment and going out. In fact, they didn't explain clearly how to position themselves after going out. By the end of 2005, my thinking was basically mature. I sublimate the above three points into: to be the first real lawyer in China, to protect the future, to protect China and to protect myself.

In March 2006, my dream became to be the first truly free barrister in China, defending the future, China and myself. Free personality and several attributes are added to it, which is to be a truly free China person. Free individuals are self-shaping in thought and behavior, not historical culture or foreign culture, as long as they are shaped by myself. Character refers to my arrogant shortcomings, plus my dirty inner world, which is officially forgiven by my gentle appearance. The so-called big is that it is better to rule the outside world than to be compressed by the world, and the expansion of the overlord atmosphere is related to this.

In this process, I bid farewell to the hermit complex and went to the overlord. Under such circumstances, I reopened the door of China culture, which was closed for nearly ten years, reflected on innovation, put my thoughts on western law, economy and culture back into action in my heart, and interpreted a fierce battle between Chinese and foreign cultures in my heart. It can be said that this is the first bitter battle between the two in my heart. As a result of the war, I began to rethink my history and national culture. Be a truly free man, abandon slavery, abandon double-dealing, bid farewell to historical and literary figures such as throats, and think about Zhuge Liang and the Monkey King. In my world, I finally burst into tears and finally saw it clearly. I was born again. Like Nu Wa, I shaped my own flesh and blood. Like Gong Gong and Kuafu, I shaped my own spiritual aspirations. Like the Yellow Emperor, I started to fight in the south and set up my own achievements. Looking back at history, China and others are so transparent and clear.

Ideal: Be the first truly free barrister in China, defend the future, protect China and protect yourself.

Around this ideal and self-orientation, there has been a protracted debate in the online world. For me, it is not to brag about myself with an unattainable goal, not to show off my uniqueness in front of others, but to give myself a goal and a standard to supervise myself. The fundamental purpose of putting forward such an ideal is not to achieve this goal, but to severely urge ourselves to fight for a goal. As long as you are in the right direction, although there is no big difference between individuals in an instant, it will be very different in ten years.

Around 2006, I stopped to reflect and plan, only to find that the previous idea of taking lawyers as a springboard failed. Only by resolutely doing it will there be a new turn for the better, and failure will be irreparable. Target positioning therefore becomes the main basis for the future. If the future fails, the past will fail. We must cut off the tragedy of defining the future from the past and redefine the true self-meaning of the past with the future.

Looking back on my arguments with lawyers on the Internet and my contact and communication with lawyers in the real world, I personally feel that I should not follow their path. I must explore a path of my personality development, which is different from the lawyers I met. My goal is to become the first real lawyer in China. In order to publicize my enterprising spirit, develop my inner spiritual quality and shape my core culture and values, I aim to be a lawyer with a free personality, so as to be the first real freedom in China in combination with my goal.

According to the development trend of my personality, I have gradually established a future-oriented life thinking, and the future-oriented living habits that have gradually formed over the past ten years cannot be changed. And as far as my personality is concerned, there will be no leap in career development in recent years. In addition, my personality does not like to rely on the accumulation of the past, nor do I like to rely on a specific resource background for development. I like the thrill of starting a business from scratch, so I can't base my life on the past and present. Moreover, my resignation as a lawyer in Beijing was not based on evasion. If I lose my future, my life will be very painful for myself and others because of a wrong decision in the past. On the contrary, I think my future can dilute the meaning of the past, and I can reinterpret any behavior in the past if I want. For the lawyer industry and China, I am optimistic about their future. Naturally, I am willing to share the prosperous future of China and the bright future of China's lawyer industry, regardless of the present situation and reality. Therefore, based on the future of China and the lawyer industry and my special psychology, I decided to take the future as the foundation of my life, defend the beautiful scenery of the future, and refute any pessimistic views on China, the lawyer industry and myself.

It's easier said than done to protect China and himself. You should be responsible for yourself in whatever way you take to restrain yourself. As for the guardianship of China, the reason lies in the future direction of China. At present, there are many arguments. The so-called protection is only a development direction to defend China. Judging from the lawyer's position in China ruled by law, if the goal is to realize the rule of law, then China's guardianship means that he will appear as a promoter, tying himself to China ruled by law and sharing life and death. And a big reason is that without the cooperation of external environment and others, people's main time will be wasted on internal friction. Without the prosperity of China and the rule of law in China, my personal demand for freedom and independent life would be crazy. Guarding also means confronting others, striving for self-control and the development direction of China.

Seeing the above ideals, it is better to be a lawyer yourself. This goal is simple. As long as you don't resign, you are a lawyer. Secondly, it is not difficult to be a free individual lawyer. I can persist if I want to. It will be later to become the first truly free-spirited barrister in China. Finally, for China and myself, self-care is just a spiritual appeal. Taking care of myself will still ruin a lot of my time and energy. As for China, I don't have such talent and courage, but if I don't say such a goal, I will blame myself blindly. Although I can't reach such a goal, I can comfort myself at some point.

The first battle: be the first real lawyer in China, defend the future, protect China and protect yourself.

When it comes to the first battle, it's actually far from it. In 2006, I felt that I needed more lawyers to hone my lawyer's professional level, because I had decided to bury my head in the lawyer's business and mix it up first. Secondly, summing up the past perceptual experience, I found that I need to shape myself through traditional culture, and I want to leave the law school to exchange experiences online with professional lawyers' websites. At this moment, some netizens of Fazhuan Online were very disgusted with the number of posts they posted. He said that all they came up with was my post, but I couldn't see other people's posts. This idea should seem ridiculous. If others don't post, it means that there are not many lawyers' ideas to share on the forum. If others don't send it, you can't let me send it. This kind of thinking does not require others to post more posts to supplement the balance of the forum, but let me balance the forum without posting. If I don't send it, the legal professional edition will be more calm. Even if I don't send it, others won't send it because of me. Therefore, under such circumstances, I posted a post "Views on my post" in the exchange version of the judicial examination. In this post, I gave two choices, one is support, please continue to post, the other is disgust, don't post. This has also triggered a long-running debate. According to the actual situation, change the text appropriately to facilitate the reading of friends who are not familiar with the situation.

My personal evaluation: I made many friends in the debate, which basically released my momentum. Although there were attacks on each other later, they all controlled each other well. Now I go back and read this debate carefully. Actually, it was communication, but the smell of gunpowder was strong at that time, but later everyone became friends. There are several points in the analysis: first, we should be good at developing the focus of disputes and always grasp the core of disputes. Change and differentiation are the core of disputes, and only by controlling the focus of disputes can we gain control. This experience is also applicable in litigation; Second, for the audience and the judges, it is necessary to consider their feelings. In any argument, they will form their own judgment psychologically and be good at winning support; Third, my personality and judgment of others easily hinder the macro grasp of the whole argument. Argument broadens one's horizons. Through argument, I understand the importance of making friends.

First of all, the content of my post

Comments on my post were published on June 65438+1October 65438+July Law School Online, including the following contents:

"Recently, some friends are very confused about my post. Considering everyone's opinions and feelings, I'm going to stop writing. I also want to be quiet for a few days and calm everyone's mind at the same time.

Law online has made me think a lot, and I have seen many new ideas when I came here. However, I gradually surpassed the level of legal online. In fact, the same is true of China Lawyers Network. Therefore, writing has stopped me from moving forward.

Now what I want to do in law school online has basically been solved, that is, to eliminate confusion and see the future clearly. Now that I have thought about the future, the rest is down-to-earth exploration.

I appreciate the experience of growing up online in law school, but I really want to leave some time for you.

Happy new year to you all! "

Objectively analyzing this post has the following backgrounds:

1, there is no absolute difference between posts and people. I have little communication with the netizens of online law school, just posting, and seldom participate in commenting on other posts. There may be communication barriers between me and netizens, and there will be misjudgment.

2. I started writing online, and later I bought a notebook to write at home. But this post was posted in my hometown for the New Year, and I haven't bought a notebook yet. I used to find a place to write about my experience in law school online. Later, a law school online netizen suggested me to blog, and then I built a blog in the people's court network rule of law forum. The name of the blog is "Lei Haijun", and then I seldom write anything in the online law school. But the articles I posted on my blog in the early stage need to be approved, and the cycle is very long. So I usually write it on the legal online first, and then forward it to the rule of law forum, China lawyer network and blog. But it's still inconvenient. I need to go to the Internet cafe to write something. Later, in March 2006, I bought a notebook, and many things were written in it, so I distributed it less.

3. On the surface, I asked for advice on the post, but actually I asked others what they thought of me. So what is actually displayed around the post is the personality conflict between people and the debate about lawyer's practice style. For me, there are two choices: guarding the post and myself. My basic idea is to be firm in my ideals.

4. I have speculated in advance that the people who really express their opinions are not their opinions on the post, but more their personal opinions. Many of them are still voting for their own path. Generally speaking, people who read my posts are either inspired by my posts or disgusted. The former is a lawyer who walks in front of me, and the latter is an unconscious intern or quasi-lawyer.

I personally intend to test my psychological endurance in the face of other people's comments and criticisms through this post. However, this post finally made me have emotional communication with many people in the forum.

Now, let's sum up this argument.

First, in the early stage, talk about jobs and people together.

The netizen's speech is basically that my post generally feels impetuous and lacks profound thinking. They oppose relatively abstruse metaphysics and welcome simple and practical articles. They think that lawyers should be high-profile in legal services and low-key in writing articles. Some netizens suggested adding "it doesn't matter" to the options, because they said that the average person wouldn't be disgusted, and the original mentality didn't matter. At this time, there are also people who support thinking and encourage them to continue posting.

Seeing the growing opposition, it is impossible to objectively analyze the reasons for everyone's opposition. I suggest that opponents provide reasons and occupations for my objective analysis. According to the voting situation, I noticed that many of them are trainee lawyers, and some of them have known me on their own initiative before, and there are still many private exchanges. Through objective analysis, I found that my post was opposed by lawyers in the rule of law forum. They think I shouldn't write about the bad side of the legal profession. The opinions of professional netizens such as judges are objective, but they are basically limited to how to treat the defects of the legal profession and have no objective and balanced views on the future of the legal profession. In China Lawyers Network, there are few opinions, because they are all talking about the actual situation of the lawyer industry and thinking about solutions; In the online law school, because everyone is generally a friend who wants to take the judicial examination, only a few are friends who have just passed the judicial examination, so they feel less about the profession of lawyer.

Under such circumstances, I began to throw out the focus of controversy: My slogan is to be the first real lawyer in China, protect China and protect myself, so I won't confine my topic to lawyers. From the perspective of making China a bigger lawyer, we must be lawyers in China, not in China. The group I am talking about is capital and power. Secondly, the focus of my thinking is only myself, not that I am not profound, but that you are superficial. What you said is very profound, that is, how to be a good trainee lawyer, how to make money and so on. I can't help you think. Finally, I will not stand on the position of a small lawyer and tell the ups and downs of a lawyer's life. I need to look to the future.

Analyze the reasons for the old lawyer's objection as follows:

1. told many secrets of the legal profession, which made the old lawyer lose face and became angry from embarrassment.

Don't talk about the darkness of the legal profession everywhere. For example, this view is popular among lawyers in the rule of law forum.

3, disrespect for old lawyers, always trying to surpass them, making them under great pressure, so that they can't find a sense of superiority in front of young people.

4. Some old lawyers secretly practice themselves, but tell others that it is not good to do so.

5. Innovating the legal profession does not bring opportunities to everyone, but is a challenge, which is quite disgusting.

Analyze the reasons why trainee lawyers object as follows:

1, personality differences. I am naturally disgusted with some personality traits, hate people and refuse posts.

2. Stage differences. Being a small lawyer, satisfying food and clothing, or being grateful for the role of intern lawyer, or eager to have one, what I advocate has dampened their enthusiasm.

3. Differences in ability.

4. Road differences. When something new doesn't help you, but scares you, you will instinctively reject it, even though you know it's your own problem or someone else's.

Under such circumstances, I turned the focus of the debate to how we view the current situation of the legal profession and how we should be lawyers, reducing the focus of a dispute and turning to my personal vote.

Second, the stage of debate about my personality.

Summarize the focus of the debate as follows:

1, some netizens think: I am fighting alone.

I think: the debate does not care about the number of people, but about the commanding heights of thought and theory. An attitude without thinking is not an attitude, and an opinion without angle is just a chat.

2. Some netizens think: I am trying my best to blow my own horn, and I am ambitious. For me, the furthest distance in the world is my heart. This is a big lie, but it's actually bring disgrace to oneself.

I think: if you are not afraid of empty talk, you are afraid of having no thoughts! Pride and modesty should be my own decision. Lawyers are freelancers. If neither attitude nor personality can be independent and free, what is freedom? What do lawyers do in a society ruled by law without China's guardianship? If you don't defend the future of China and me, what do you need a lawyer for? Now, if you break it or let someone else ruin it, you don't need a lawyer. So I think I'm just telling the truth.

3. Some netizens think: I am anxious to accept my apprentice.

I think: At present, many young lawyers are a mob, and they can't take on heavy responsibilities because they don't have their own position. The development of the cause depends not on the number of people, but on truly high-quality talents. People who are not fit to be lawyers cannot train qualified lawyers!

4. Some netizens think that everyone should be simple and don't think too much about things that they can't control.

I don't think it's enough to write about lawyers and judicial examinations. I have never been liked, and there is no way to make others feel. This is a bad habit!

5. Some netizens asked me about my research direction or expertise.

I replied: professional knowledge is based on customers. If I say that I have a lot of personal expertise, then the concentration of customer expertise is the key. Only when clients are concentrated and specialized can we talk about the specialization of lawyers. At present, I don't have the ability to attract customers through my own major.

6. Some netizens think that the doctrine of the mean is also a state of life, and I should design the option of "it doesn't matter".

I think: it is also my attitude not to let others make a gentle gesture! It is better to reform the legal profession than to adapt. If China needs reform, so be it! How to live is not to live, and decide not to wronged yourself. Reform whoever is an obstacle! Now society lacks criticism and reflection, impetuous, and humanities need innovation, so I stand up and speak out! I'm not afraid to speak, I'm not afraid to say the wrong thing, but I just can't go on!

7. Some netizens think that my words are sharp as a knife, and my attitude towards netizens makes people hate my character.

I think: the purpose of my argument is not to be your enemy, but that you have chosen a hostile attitude. Everyone's behavior is objectively reflected in the post. When I ask for advice, I can also ask your position. If your behavior goes beyond a certain level, it will become your own vote!

8. Some netizens think that it is not useless, and some posts are good. What we are playing here is his attitude, and rarely involves the content of his post. At the beginning, many people were better and crazier than him. Isn't it all repaired by the government now? Instead of watching young people take detours and stumble, it is also good for him to be reminded in time as a bystander. If Master Lei is ungrateful, there is nothing we can do but let him go.

Some netizens think: I can't help thinking of the greatest philosopher more than 2,400 years ago. Because self-confidence and even conceit come from God's mission and gift to the host of Athens city-state. He has been doggedly seeking the existence of truth all his life. He struggled for democracy in Athens all his life. I have been searching for my ignorance all my life. I used to pursue the sacred word lawyer. Lost a lot in the pursuit. When it is very close to this ideal. Because there is no such paranoia, I have to go back. In fact, I think our society is full of too much evil. But almost everyone has lost the courage to criticize. Even the slightest sound is lost.

Some netizens think: Generally speaking, I should study law. If you enter the ranks of lawyers after graduation, you should not be over 23 years old. If you are over this age, you will definitely find a job in government agencies (that kind of leisure institutions) or institutions or state-owned enterprises after graduation. I have represented some cases during my work (of course, as a citizen, it is difficult to judge whether I have received money). I'm a lawyer now, and I love this job, but I won't be a full-time lawyer for more than a year. I am male, with extreme personality, more excited and more conceited. Since childhood, my life has been relatively comfortable and smooth, and I have basically not encountered major setbacks. Suggestion: read more books, be a good lawyer, don't talk nonsense, pay attention to the reality of all aspects of society, and learn modestly from the old lawyers, judges, prosecutors and policemen you admire. So, ten years later, write a similar article according to what you have learned and seen.

Some netizens believe that everyone has everyone's ideas and living methods. Society is complex, not as simple as imagined. Impulse and fantasy are the characteristics of young people. With the passage of time and rich experience, people will gradually mature. Therefore, don't rush to "express your position" first, talk about it for a few years, first integrate into society, and then talk about transforming society.

I really want to know now, have you really done a case? After reading your childish long speech, your foul language is very good, and it is not bad to shoot people at will. By the way, I have no hobby of raping myself, and I don't object to your hobby of raping myself. After all, how to abuse yourself is your right, right?

Some netizens think that although he is not a high-paid intern lawyer, he has been regarded as a high-illusion lawyer by some friends!

Some netizens said to me: Do you have anything useful for yourself? Lei Haijun himself doesn't have much practical experience, but he is dying with an elder accent. He deliberately went to other forums to find what you wrote. Of course, being scolded has nothing to say, which does not mean that Lawyer Lei is incompetent. It is normal that anyone who is abused by others will always go crazy. I hope you can read more books, learn the most basic qualities of being a man and do more practical things, otherwise you will brag more. However, no matter how you teach others, you will accomplish nothing. You fantasize all day about being the first real lawyer in China, imagining yourself as a savior, and looking forward to defending the future of China, China and yourself. I really don't know what to say to you. To tell you the truth, you opened my eyes, but I took it as a joke.

Some netizens said to me: the landlord seems to have hit a wall everywhere in reality and resigned as a civil servant. I'm not sure he ran into a wall everywhere as a lawyer, but he certainly didn't make any money. In practice, he seems to have no expertise except shouting slogans. I really don't know why the landlord is so arrogant, saying that China is the first lawyer. Regarding ideas, I want to tell the landlord that the most important thing in this era is all kinds of messy and illogical ideas. If the landlord does not change this way of thinking and lifestyle, including the way of being a man, I am sure that the landlord will achieve nothing in the lawyer industry. I just posted it to this person because it looked very unpleasant.

9. Some netizens think that I am sharp-minded, novel and profound, and have the demeanor of Li Ao! But arrogance shows immaturity. I should find a balance between ideal and reality.

Some netizens think: I can't say that I don't dislike my macro prose, but I still appreciate individual chapters. Everyone has a clear purpose and wants to seek skills and experience suitable for their own survival and even getting rich. At least, they need such an encouragement. I have lofty ideals and ambitions, and I have independent and profound thinking about society and industry. I should be the pillar, but living among us "laity", I'm afraid it's hard to find a bosom friend, and I'm too tall to be widowed!

I believe that there is no conflict of interest between lawyers and the government in building a country ruled by law. Lawyers should sell themselves to the public government, and lawyers should not unilaterally think that confrontation with the government is the rule of law itself. Ambition makes people successful, mediocre and extraordinary, which is actually a long-standing habit of positioning themselves.

10, some netizens think: I don't have any insight except shouting some broken slogans and belittling others at will. Others know as much as I do, but they are self-aware, never supercilious, and don't judge others and other things with a condescending attitude. This is a question of cultivation and self-restraint. I don't have these qualities. Instead of letting me talk nonsense again, it is better to bash me head-on and throw cold water on me to sober me up, which is also a kind of help and education for me.

I think if many friends give them too much advice, it will actually kill their enthusiasm. Only evenly matched opponents can have the pleasure of communication!

1 1. Some netizens think you are a bit like Sister Furong.

I thought: I use my brain and she uses her body. Sister Furong's achievement is not her attitude towards pressure, but the reckless saliva and abuse of contemporary young people on the Internet. She is more like a symbol of the latter. Because it is profound, it is a post at hand, and chatting is an idea! I can't help being proud!

12, a netizen signed: Although I temporarily occupied Peach Blossom Island in the name of pirates, I never robbed merchant ships, just to keep the enemy from getting too close. But like a real pirate, I still have a woman I love and a hometown I miss.

I comment: It is your initiative to treat robbers as hermits. You have reformed the connotation of this profession! You look like a robber, but in fact you escaped from a desert island. I'm afraid you will protect your woman in your dreams! If so, it's someone else's wife. But the ideal is not important! If you regard lawyers as a way to escape and then beg for money and women in the corner, you and Huang Friends are already a level figure. You avoid silence, but you think you are strong. He escaped from a drunken dream and thought he was really mixed up! Everyone has spiritual taste!

Netizen reply: inexplicably, I can still see so much from my signature message. I don't know how you can see that I regard the profession of lawyer as a way to escape; Why should I go begging on the street corner? Women are everywhere and wealth is everywhere. What should I do to escape into silence? I don't feel strong, arrogant and inferior. I want to refute, but there seems to be no logic at all. I don't know where to start, so I have to smile.

I replied: Your mentality is begging and escaping. No matter what you are doing now, you are running away from a distant thing. You stand in a distant corner, opposing the distant thing in your heart, trying to succeed, but you didn't, so you gained your English, accounting and so on! Robbers are you who want to be strong. Although you are fragile, you will still think about your past beauty and women. Your inner weakness is your eternal enemy! Lawyers can't make you strong, and robbers can't, because you avoided it. Maybe today's debate will make you say goodbye to the mentality and practice of escape! Stop running, stop and have a look, there is nothing to be afraid of, don't regard yourself as an accomplice of others to attack and destroy yourself!

13, I think: eating is a good thing! If you can eat a self, that's a good thing! Some people eat like cannibals, many eat themselves and are much thinner! Eating is also a kind of culture, life needs art, not eating is also a kind of enjoyment, throwing caution to the wind, eating and drinking, laughing! I suggest drinking. Since I am not as drunk as I used to be, I should change my drunken state and think about whether I should wake up in drunkenness! Don't drink less! Drink it yourself and come out with a different self!