What is the practical significance of the fable "pulling out seedlings to encourage growth"?

The practical significance of pulling out seedlings to encourage growth. The ancients were really smart. In a few words, we can sum up the way of thinking and the standard of action of China people. Although "pulling out seedlings to encourage growth" and "killing chickens to get eggs" are old sayings, they still have vitality. When we laugh at the people in the story, we are repeating the same story. During the May 4th Movement, the people of China clamored for science and democracy. With the beginning of the new century, it seems that China people are still unwilling to do things that conform to the law. "Milk powder is poisonous", and there is an uproar. In fact, all poisonous things are not necessarily bad. Snake venom is poisonous enough, and reasonable utilization can also benefit mankind. The key is why "milk powder is toxic" and must meet the standard! Protein didn't have enough ingredients, so he used poison to make up for it. Anyway, as long as it meets the standards, it is enough to pass the acceptance. This is a strategy. In Lu You's words, Kung Fu is beyond poetry. "Now there are fakes, who will use them!" This classic line really can't be a joke. If you work harder and get the protective clothing commended by the national ministries, you can rest easy. When the milk powder thing was raging, Shenqi also went to heaven. A project that requires the most advanced technology, the people of China have achieved foolproof. As we all know, a slight mistake in any link will lead to tragedy. So you can imagine what efforts scientists have made and what responsibilities they shoulder. God seven can go to heaven, but milk powder is poisonous, which is a meaningful contrast. When there are bad phenomena in society, as teachers, parents sometimes really don't know how to explain them. Such doubts are unnecessary, and our students have actually matured in such an atmosphere. They have experienced too many "standards" and already know the mystery. It's just that they can't say the classic words of the ancients! Reading Dewey's and Tao Xingzhi's books, the first feeling is that they are doing things in a down-to-earth manner and doing things that conform to the law. Education cannot poison students, which is very important, but it is also difficult to do. Parents want teachers to meet the standards, and teachers have to meet the standards. Failure to meet the standard means that it is not a textbook. In fact, our parents are sometimes stupid, holding a huge egg, and sometimes they don't think about how this poisonous egg came from. Life is full of mystery, and students' growth has its own trajectory. If we don't fear life, it will be a lifelong poison for students. Sato said: Education is full of uncertainty. An excellent teacher brings out excellent students in the class, but I don't know how his educational methods will affect every student! If it is not formal education, it is toxic. If we do more things like "pulling out the seedlings to encourage them" and "killing the goose to get the egg", such an atmosphere will be formed, and people will not be willing to do things in a down-to-earth manner. Horses are not fat at night, and there are many unique ways. What I want to say is that even if it is not innovative, it can't be toxic! In fact, we never lack wisdom and never lack responsibility!