Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - What's the difference between the Golden Globe Award and the European Golden Globe Award?

What's the difference between the Golden Globe Award and the European Golden Globe Award?

The "European Football Golden Globe Award" was selected by journalists from authoritative media in various countries under UEFA, which more accurately considered the performance of candidates this year;

00 "World Footballer of the Year" is judged by coaches and captains from all over the world. "Timeliness" is not enough, but "fame" is more important. Under normal circumstances, only by worshipping the football circle can you be elected as the world footballer of the year.

To a certain extent, the Golden Globe Award of European football is more authoritative and objective than the World Footballer of the Year, and represents the widest voice of the masses.

Because of this, it has always been the dream crown of players who fought in Europe.

At present, it is more popular to say that the selection of the European Golden Globe Award is more authoritative, because the award is voted by journalists from all over Europe, and these judges always pay attention to the dynamics of European football, so it is easier to choose the best player of the year. In contrast, the awards held by FIFA are voted by the head coach of the national team (who has joined the team captain at present), which is often more random, so there will be jokes similar to that of China player Gong Lei who won one vote in the past. In addition, because coaches often judge by "impression points".

There is some truth in the above statement, but it is a bit one-sided to assume that the status of "European Footballer" is higher than that of "World Footballer". Although there are some shortcomings in the timeliness of FIFA's awarding activities, from another perspective, it is such a selection feature that pays attention to "impression points", which makes the winner of "World Footballer of the Year" often more representative of a certain era.

For example, in 1996 and 2003, sammer and Nedved were elected "European Footballer of the Year" respectively, while in FIFA, the winners were Cristiano Ronaldo and Zidane. Judging from the results of that year, it is true that the European Golden Globe Award is more worthy of the name, but judging from the influence exerted by football players at that time, Cristiano Ronaldo and Zidane have obvious advantages. Therefore, for these awards, there may be no absolute difference. The real difference lies in the different angles of evaluating the player's role.