Why is there a "central school" level institution in Changning?

Then I have to give you a brief explanation: the central school is the leading educational institution at the township level, and it is completely a redundant institution at the first level. At that time, it was called the school district, which was also located in the local area and directly led the work of various schools in the township. In 2007, it was widely rumored that institutions at this level were going to lay off employees, but in the end it was renamed as a central school instead of a school district, and the work was easier. In the past, it was directly managed, but now it has become an institution dedicated to the inspection of higher authorities. For example, the Education Bureau will come to our school to check the start of school tomorrow, so the central school will conduct an inspection first today and check with the schools under its jurisdiction, so that the inspection tomorrow can be successfully completed. After the inspection, they disappeared. So it is difficult for us to see them several times a semester, but as long as there is inspection, they can always arrive on time. Some time ago, Comrade Hu Xin, director of the Education Bureau of Changning City, held a national conference for educators in Beijing, which lasted for a week and gained a lot. No, I just got back. I gathered the principals of primary and secondary schools in the city to share his gains in Beijing. At the meeting, Director Hu told some interesting stories about his stay in Beijing. One of the things is this: once, when Director Hu was chatting with the education directors of several other places, Director Hu mentioned that there were school-level institutions in Changning City. The other directors all laughed. The director of education in a certain place in Guangdong said: Then your institution can enter the museum, because in our place, it was an institution before the reform and opening up, and it was withdrawn in the early 1980s. To tell the truth, when I first heard the news, I was overjoyed and thought it seemed that I was going to remove the redundant institutions at this level. Who knows, when I heard this, I lost the following. I wondered at that time: Is the Secretary just playing a joke on everyone? But I also thought: this is a serious matter. After all, layoffs are offensive, so we should take a long-term view. Maybe the leader will let the wind out today and act later. Now almost two months have passed, but nothing has happened. It seems that it is really a joke of the director. There may be many reasons why leaders have to say that they can't be laid off, but I think the most fundamental reason is that now everyone wants to be an official and a cadre, so they have to give leaders money and benefits. Leaders take other people's money and receive other people's benefits, so they must do something to arrange a position for others. Therefore, even the things that should be eliminated cannot be eliminated. Not only can it not be eliminated, it will increase. Didn't Changning Education Bureau set up several central schools two years ago? As an educator, I don't feel so funny when I hear such a thing again.