An interesting international event hypothesis about the Gulf War and the United Nations Security Council.

What's so hard about that? Let's investigate first, and then we'll talk about it. Anyway, it is carried out in accordance with the way of dealing with terrorist incidents, and every effort is made to protect the safety of hostages, but it will never agree to the demands of gangsters. The worst result is that the hostages are all dead. I am sure that no country will agree to some state affairs just because a representative is taken hostage, even if the president is detained. Unless the hostage is a dictator or spiritual leader of that country, don't even think about it.

And if it turns out that Saddam Hussein ordered it, the United Nations will immediately declare Saddam a terrorist. At that time, not only a few countries will send troops to fight Iraq, but all countries that have the opportunity will send troops! ! That's a global siege! If you don't have the strength to defeat all the great powers in the world, don't take action to challenge all the great powers. The United Nations can be ignored by big countries, but it will never tolerate the malicious provocation of small countries! This is a rule of the game established by all big countries. Only a few big countries can violate it, while small countries will face the joint suppression of all big countries if they want to violate it.

Of course, if it is proved that Saddam did not do it, it will only be a new terrorist incident. Like 9 1 1, countries continue to talk about the Gulf issue, but at the same time, there is a counter-terrorism resolution. ...