Shanxi old farmer joke

An old farmer in Shanxi was eaten by sheep, and the old farmer was detained and brought to court because the sheep was poisoned. "I put up a warning sign in the ground saying there was poison, so the death of the sheep has nothing to do with me!" In Xinzhou, Shanxi, Lao Wang planted Bupleurum chinense in his own field, but he was repeatedly eaten by passing sheep. Lao Wang had no choice but to sprinkle corn kernels soaked with phorate (commonly known as 39 1 1) into his own medicine field, but at the same time, he not only set up warning signs on the east and west sides of the door, but also asked the village cadres to tell the villagers through radio that drugs had been sprinkled in his home field.

Who knows, Han, a villager in the same village, knows this situation and still lets the sheep eat Chinese herbal medicine in Lao Wang's field. After being poisoned by 33, Han called the police. It was identified that phorate was detected in the stomach of Han dead sheep, which was poisoned and died. When the police found the old queen, Lao Wang quickly admitted his drug-spreading behavior, but he always thought that there was nothing wrong with me spreading drugs on his own land. Other people's sheep will be fine if they don't go in, so Lao Wang feels that he is not responsible for it.

However, Lao Wang was still taken compulsory measures by the public security organs and prosecuted by the prosecution. So legally speaking, how should Lao Wang's behavior be evaluated? Lao Wang believes that his subjective purpose is to protect personal legal property from infringement, so he has to go to the ground, so it should be considered as self-defense.

Lao Wang also believes that after he sprinkled the medicine, he not only asked the village cadres to inform the villagers, but also set up warning signs in the field. He has fulfilled all his obligations. On the other hand, Han's behavior, knowing that he was spreading medicine underground and still letting him eat medicinal materials, was a deliberate destruction of property, and the police should investigate Han's legal responsibility.

The prosecution believes that Lao Wang Ming knows that phorate is a highly toxic pesticide banned by the state, but it is still put into use in the field. Although warning signs were set up and the villagers were informed, it could not effectively prevent the occurrence of harmful results, which belonged to indirect intention and should be considered as the crime of deliberately releasing dangerous substances.

The court found through trial that although Pharaoh knew that phorate was highly toxic, he took certain preventive measures, which was a fault that should be foreseen but not foreseen, and should be considered as the crime of negligent release of dangerous substances. Therefore, the court held that the victim in this case had a major fault, and Lao Wang gave compensation to the other party, and the other party chose to forgive Lao Wang. The court sentenced Lao Wang to one year's imprisonment and suspended for two years. After the verdict, Lao Wang did not appeal.

Finally, the case also tells us that safeguarding rights must not be illegal, otherwise the consequences will be very serious! At the same time, it also tells us that it is a long way to go to improve the legal awareness of rural people. Dear readers, what do you think of this? Welcome to comment!