Is the 20 10.6. 13 Henan earthquake circulating on the Internet true?

Vulnerability 1: It is a joke for Americans to predict the earthquake in China.

The Post said at the beginning that this prediction came from NASA and the National Seismological Network. Netizens questioned that Americans can't even predict their own earthquakes, but also predict the earthquakes in China? Joke! And ask the poster, have you ever seen Americans accurately publish their own earthquake predictions?

Netizens also suggested that in May 2008, shortly after the Wenchuan earthquake, there was a rumor on the Internet that "the American Seismological Bureau predicted that the epicenter of the earthquake would move to Xi 'an", which was quickly refuted by authoritative departments, and even the American Seismological Bureau in the article was confirmed as a non-existent institution.

In official news reports, the US Geological Survey made it clear that it would not predict earthquakes, but only make long-term probability prediction and evaluate earthquake disasters.

Vulnerability 2: Earthquake (harmony) prediction can't be so accurate.

Netizens said that authoritative departments have repeatedly denied rumors, saying that earthquake prediction is still a worldwide scientific (harmonious) problem, and the accuracy of all earthquake predictions to a certain day, a certain town and a certain level is a rumor.

Vulnerability 3: There is no earthquake monitoring bureau in China.

The post said that "China Earthquake Monitoring Bureau has strengthened monitoring". But netizens found that there is no "China Earthquake Monitoring Bureau" in China.

Vulnerability 4: "Zhonglian II" satellite is fictitious.

The net post said, "On April 9 17: 53 Beijing time, the satellite Zhonglian II was successfully launched in xichang satellite launch center, and the space was successfully booked on 18+04. The purpose of this launch is to comprehensively monitor all abnormal situations in Shaanxi. "

Netizens questioned xichang satellite launch center's successful launch of the "Zhonglian II" satellite, and even the news was not reported. How can the poster know the time and place so clearly?

Vulnerability 5: Exception does not exist.

The net post said, "Xinghua has animal abnormalities. The temperature in neighboring towns such as Changning, Hedao and Zhenyuan increased by 3.3 degrees Celsius, and rodents such as rats increased sharply. According to the news released by Xi Geological Survey, more than 76% of hot springs in Lintong District have the phenomenon of rising water temperature and turning black. There are also signs similar to the Tangshan earthquake in Zhouzhi. "

A netizen in Xianyang said: "It's sunny today. After several days of rain, the air is fresh and people feel very comfortable. The so-called' the sky is foggy, the air is cloudy and the sun is dim' is purely nonsense. " Immediately, some netizens questioned that the counties and districts did not report any abnormalities, which must be fabricated.

The post said that "Mawei volcano may erupt again", and netizens questioned Mawei volcano activity? Why is history never recorded?

Relevant departments have been involved in the investigation of this rumor, and those who create earthquake rumors will be punished by law.