Grandpa choked to death on the bus, and his family sued the driver for 654.38+0 million. Do you think the driver is at fault?

There is nothing wrong with the driver. Everyone knows not to eat on the bus. Uncle is old and will choke if he eats too fast, let alone eat in a rickety car. Now the family thinks that the driver will lose money if he dies in the car. What kind of fairy logic is this? Why let the driver pay!

First, the driver's duty is to drive, not to look after the elderly. This has nothing to do with the driver. No matter how big the city is, the bus is the most crowded means of transportation, and it is very easy to choke when eating on the bus, especially when there are many people crowded. However, this Changsha uncle put the chewy rice cake in his mouth when he was on the bus, and his aunt who got on the bus with him didn't stop him. Then, because there were too many people crowded around, his mouth was stuck.

When the driver saw it, he quickly sent the uncle to the hospital for rescue, but because the rescue was invalid, the uncle died, and then unexpected things happened. Aunt and uncle's children caught the driver and asked him for compensation. In fact, the driver is really wronged. He is a driver. Do you still have to take care of the passengers on the bus?

In the process of driving, the driver can only ensure the safety of the vehicle, and then ensure the safety of the passengers on board. Is it difficult to control what uncle is eating? If the driver is in charge, it is estimated that the uncle will also curse? What do you care what I eat? ? Is it so difficult to be a driver now? It's really hard to get involved. According to the uncle's family, everyone in the car at that time had to pay compensation. After all, they all saw uncle eating and didn't stop him. The uncle family is really a wonderful group!

Second, the driver in the bus can only see near the upper and lower doors, and the driver doesn't know what the uncle did or ate. It is not unreasonable to say that the driver is wronged. People who have taken the bus should pay attention to the driver's line of sight. In addition to paying attention to the situation outside the car, they also need to look at the situation near the door when they get on and off, so cameras are usually installed in the car, but the range that drivers can see at any time is the pictures and monitors near the door, which drivers in other areas can't see.

After getting on the bus, many drivers can't keep staring at him, so the driver doesn't know what he ate and did. Now he choked to death and said that the driver didn't stop him. I just want to ask, why didn't the aunt who got on the bus with him stop him? The whole family has no complaints, so why let the driver, an outsider, care about this uncle and remind him? What wonderful logic is this?

Third, the uncle's incredible logic of claiming compensation is shameless. I believe the court will handle it fairly. Judging from the beginning and end of this incident, the aunt's children simply want the driver to be a big head. Although the deceased is big, the driver is just a driver. Why is this man responsible for the life and death of the people in the car? According to the uncle's family, as long as you take the bus, you will buy a personal accident insurance. If you choke on food, you will ask the driver to pay. If you get heatstroke because of the sun outside the window, you can also ask the driver for compensation. After all, these things happened in the car. Drivers are responsible.

If that's the case, the bus will probably be gone, because drivers are human and people have families to support. No one dares to do such a risky job. If one of them is not good, there will be nothing. Being a driver will cost thousands of dollars a month, which is not enough for compensation. Now that this matter has been handed over to the court, I believe the judge will handle this matter fairly. After all, no one deserves sympathy before the law.

Finally: although this society will be biased towards the injured party, the uncle's family is indeed a bit excessive. It is shameless to exert humanitarian pressure on drivers under the banner of safeguarding rights!