? Interview: Who is the most suitable for sales among the four monks in Tang Dynasty?

Wei Ruiting, an undergraduate of Tianjin Normal University, went to a clothing company for an interview. Being inexperienced, she was caught off guard by the examiner. One of the questions is: Who is the most suitable for sales among the four monks in the Tang Dynasty? She blindfolded her eyes at once and immediately used her brain: Tang Priest was too "upright", Wukong was too active and unruly, and Bajie was sweet-mouthed but unreliable at the critical moment. As for Friar Sand, he is too honest and gullible ... After returning to school, Wei Ruiting rushed online and found that this is a classic interview question, and there are several answers, as long as he can justify himself. Wei Ruiting never imagined that she was asked the same question the next day. A few days later, she went to a public relations company for an interview and encountered the same problem. Nowadays, many graduates prepare for the interview as a postgraduate entrance examination and spend a long time reciting questions and answers. The exam-oriented training by rote has spread from college entrance examination and postgraduate entrance examination to job hunting. I need to say something to you. Shanxi University? Hou Yanmei's economic situation is depressed, and the job market is naturally depressed. The first threshold for college students to enter the society is the interview of enterprises. In this situation, the psychological burden of college students' interview is getting heavier and heavier, and the interview problems encountered are becoming more and more difficult. This college student questioned by Lei Ren is just an example. However, is it normal for college students to be questioned so inhumanely? Nine-year compulsory education plus three-year high school, several-year high school supplement and four-year undergraduate education are being unfairly questioned-their abilities should not be proved by such weird questions. I want to ask the interviewer: Who is more suitable for the interview? Shanxi Medical University? The author Liu Jingchun once read interviews with my brothers and sisters in magazines, but she also encountered many shocking problems. She just treats the gossip of the question as a joke, but what if the author is unfortunately struck by lightning during the interview? The author believes that no matter how many volts the employer will pay, in the final analysis, he just wants to peek at the most essential things in his heart. For example, the ability to analyze things, the ability to express things, the ability to innovate, and even the characteristics of personality, such as modesty and kindness. These questions don't have absolute standard answers like doing science questions. The author advocates that college students who have an early graduation interview (I am a sophomore, belonging to this camp) should do everything for the purpose of improving their own quality, whether for entertainment or study. Climbing to the top is not the goal, upward is the only pursuit. Just like "my mind is full of poems and books", I am pure and knowledgeable, so when the employer intends to dig, I will feel that I have got a piece of gold, and my own goal has always been to make such a piece of gold. Shanxi Medical University? Jassamyn Liu, I think the more shocking the problem, the more people should cherish it. It is said that interview is the key to career. Nowadays, there are all kinds of interview questions, and the questions are also strange, which often catch the interviewer off guard. But I think this innovation is a test of the interviewer's flexibility and comprehensive handling ability. For example, I think the question "Who is more suitable for Tang Priest's mentoring" is still very good. . You not only tested the interviewer's sales knowledge, but also tested his understanding of famous books, his grasp of characters' personalities and, most importantly, his freshness of topics. You also tested the interviewer's adaptability and reaction speed, and you can also see a person's communication ability in the interview. As for the so-called correct answer in the interview, I don't think it is desirable. The interview is about your own views on the problem. If you feel lucky to recite the correct answer, what will you say after reciting the answer? After all, the answer is not your own thing and can't stand in-depth exploration. In short, the interview needs a lot of knowledge, and this shocking interview can let us learn more lessons and master more interview skills. I feel that no matter how shocking the interview question is, we should accumulate it as a valuable wealth, constantly enrich our wings and make ourselves more handy in the interview.