Comparing Xiaogang Village and Nanjie Village in China's reform, why did they both fail?

Although Xiaogang village is a pioneer, it is not rich and successful, because Xiaogang village has not been able to achieve industrial upgrading and develop industry and commerce, and has been turning around the land. Under the premise of the whole agricultural decline, failure is inevitable. Although it failed, the failure of Xiaogang Village was tragic and tragic to Chen Sheng and Guangwu. Nanjie village was once rich, but it was not successful. The reason why we are rich is that we have seized the opportunity of industrial upgrading, at the same time, we have received excessive financial support, a vast external market and cheap foreign labor. The existence of these market factors shows the hypocrisy of the collective economy in Nanjie Village. The political aura has not only failed to bring sustained development momentum to Nanjie Village, but has lost its market competitiveness because money is too easy to come by. Therefore, Nanjie Village is rich but unsuccessful, because this wealth is also unreliable. Comparing Xiaogang Village and Nanjie Village in the process of China's reform, who is the real hero under the background of rapid social changes? The market has the final say and the law of social development has the final say.