The best answer to an open-book useful debate (no more than 50 words)

In Germany in the 1980s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrs because they saw Hitler's Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to a decline in their academic performance, and finally draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open a book depends on what volume to open first.

There are four reasons: first, there are truth, goodness and beauty, falsehood, ugliness and ugliness in the world, and books are no exception. If we are good or bad, choosing bad books will make us bad. For example, some students are obsessed with murder, pornography and other books and periodicals, and once they are addicted to them, they will be unwilling to attend classes. In the long run, they neglect their studies and many people embark on the road of crime. This is the so-called open book. Is it beneficial? Followed by reform and opening up, the country is wide open, and all kinds of books are dazzling. It can be said that there are all kinds of books, and it is really a vast sea of books! If you read aimlessly, you will end up drawing water with nothing. Third: read without thinking. If you just read this book, don't understand the literal meaning and the thoughts and feelings expressed by the author, and don't remember a beautiful sentence, even if you really "break thousands of books", it's just a bookcase. Fourth, reading some leisure books, such as jokes, is just a waste of time.

Used for:

The origin of the benefits of opening books is that Song Taizu said, "As long as you study, it is always beneficial." Since then, it has become an idiom to open books.

You may think, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is simple, the key lies in the word "total" ... which means there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial to opening books rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. You will understand the reason after reading it. )

First of all, it is well known that it is good for good books. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages of their own. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Little ones should learn several writing methods, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't produce a certain * * * sound with readers and can't let people go deep into them? If the structure and layout, expression, conception and description, language and writing of this book are plain,

Even the general "running account" composition is not as good as it is, how can it produce a * * * sound with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.

Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and it is full of typos and typos ..." Until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought that even if there is such a book, can anyone understand it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, I don't even have the premise of "opening the book". How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It only shows that the reader's own mentality is wrong. It's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame it on books. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?

Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it is beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.

As for "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening a book is not beneficial, so there is a problem: harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's a drill? If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can naturally be established, but it is wrong to say "useless". Therefore, on this issue, the opposing argument is only half right (and this half is still a positive argument).