Can today's People's Liberation Army compete with the US military during the Vietnam War in the 1960s in terms of weapons and equipment, logistics support, mechanization and automation?

There is no doubt that the PLA is 30 years more advanced than the US military during the Vietnam War in the 1960s in terms of weapons and equipment, logistics support, mechanization and automation. In other words, it is equivalent to the US military in the 1990s! Not because I am patriotic, but because I really can't stand those idiots who call themselves experts constantly belittling their own army! Without this army now, you idiot experts can still surf the Internet? Can you also tell some small military fans that the PLA's individual equipment can only catch up with the level of the US military in the 1960s or World War II? Why not compare the PLA with 1? The following is the comparison between the individual equipment of the People's Liberation Army in the 1960s and 1990s and now:

1960s us army: armed with guns m16 (the original version of m16 is now basically m 16A 1, A2, A4). Do you know how many American soldiers were hurt in the Vietnam War? A class of 12 once had 9 people playing cards together! This gun is spotless! Add some dirt and it will become a toy gun! Now the PLA is equipped with Type 95, and m 16 at that time can't match it. Although 95 has never been on the battlefield, it has experienced many experiments! You can bury it in the soil, soak it in water, fill it with some sand, and then freeze it for a while before taking it out. You can still shoot! Adapt to all kinds of weather! Before m 16, there was a big brother named m 14. This kind of gun was originally an automatic rifle, but later it was changed to semi-automatic because of its strong recoil. Because an American soldier once said that this gun is too heavy to shoot, and you can't do anything except waste a few bullets at a distance of 50 meters! Sorry, I didn't find his name. He can only use AK47 as a helmet in front of Vietnamese soldiers. Because the survival rate of being shot in the head with this helmet is inversely proportional to the penetration rate of this helmet, and the penetration rate of this helmet is extremely high ... Now the V50 value of the QGF02 helmet equipped by the PLA is even greater than the Kevlar fiber helmet currently in service in the US Army! The V50 value is the bulletproof ability. How does this ... compare? The more I write, the more I feel that those who say that the PLA's individual equipment is equivalent to the level of the US military in the 1960 s are idiots! LZ this is not about you, because you must be influenced by those people to ask this question. American troops in the 1960s were not equipped with bulletproof vests. But the PLA is now equipped! You may think I'm lying, but a country with a population of 65.438+0.3 billion and the second largest economy in the world can't even make bulletproof vests? Hehe, I thought it was a joke if I didn't know! Indeed, we have bulletproof vests! In the 2003 Iraq war, seven British soldiers wore China's bulletproof vests. Some of them didn't even die when they broke through again. One of the seven people was shot to death in the head without props, which seemed to be the neck. I forgot, I read this short message from the military network before, and I have been reading it for a long time ... You may ask why British soldiers wore China's bullet-proof vests, because at that time, the American and British troops needed a lot of bullet-proof vests, and I didn't know the name and price at that time. The PLA never wears bulletproof vests for acting. This doesn't mean that China doesn't, but it does. Why doesn't he wear it? This is because bulletproof vests are also durable! After a long time, the bulletproof effect will not be good ... There are so many people in China, and they usually don't wear anything in training exercises because they save money ... Look at these eight Somali escort formations. Which PLA Marine Corps didn't wear bulletproof vests?

1990 us army: artillery m 16A2, equipped with M4. Let's start with M 16A2. This kind of gun can only fire three times in a row, not fully automatic, which violates the purpose of assault rifle. However, this gun is not bad. It has great advantages in hitting the enemy far away, but it is really tragic when it is close! M4 and 95 have their own advantages and disadvantages, and each has its own spring and autumn. I won't explain these two guns too much here. LZ can Baidu Encyclopedia! The helmet QGF02 is compared with the Kevlar fiber helmet of the US military. As I said just now, the value of V50 is good. The bulletproof vest made of Kevlar fiber in the United States is similar to that made in China, but I think it is better for us. After all, a British soldier was shot eight times in it and didn't die! But what remains unchanged is that the bulletproof vests of the US military are very expensive!

LZ, if you really want to know the strength of the PLA, look online more. I recommend Global Military Network and China Military Network. I want to recommend another program "Military Observation Room" to you. It's from Phoenix TV in Hong Kong, and it comes out every Wednesday. Don't watch CCTV's Military Intelligence Company Watch and New Defense Watch. I tell you that these two programs only objectively comment on foreign military affairs and never talk about the People's Liberation Army. It's a waste of time, because I have watched it for two years and have never seen that foreign country compare with the People's Liberation Army! Hong Kong Military Intelligence Observation Room objectively compares the PLA and foreign troops! Every issue has it!

I wrote so much, not to reward points, not to mention that you didn't give it to the landlord ... I only told military fans, deceived people and netizens! The army in charge of our great motherland is not an army with backward weapons and equipment and barely supported by many people! It is an army with the influence of this world that has been built through the struggle of several generations! You mean this army, after its weapons and equipment retreated? It is precisely because we have such a strong army behind us that we have today!