What do you think of a pedicure shop in Xinxiang, which ended up with a prostitute's den and arrested a female boss?

Ding Yinrong, the owner of a foot bath center in Xinxiang City, was arrested and sentenced to five years and six months in prison, and the case was ruled again. The verdict is as follows: Zhu was caught in the act of prostitution. It was found through trial that Ding Mou opened the "Royal Foot Bath Leisure Club" in Xinxiang, and Ding Mou left Zhu Moumou and Wang Moumou for prostitution ten times. Zhu was caught red-handed by the police when he was engaged in prostitution in the club.

Prisoner Ding applied for commutation because of his good performance and submitted it to the commutation and parole review committee for publicity. The warden's office decided that the supervision and examination committee of the prison procuratorate would put forward a proposal for commutation, and the court ruled not to reduce the sentence. The prison procuratorial supervision and review committee put forward suggestions for commutation to the commutation and parole review committee, and then publicized them. The court held that although the prisoner Ding was rewarded during the review of commutation and parole, his property punishment was not completed, and the assessment results of criminal reform were: good, poor, good and good.

After the collective evaluation of the sub-prison area, the prison director's office will review and publicly sentence, and the penalty execution section will publicly sentence after submitting it to the commutation and parole review Committee. The warden's office will decide that the supervision and review committee of the prison procuratorate will put forward suggestions for commutation to the criminals after review, and submit them to the commutation and parole review committee for publicity. The court ruled that the sentence would not be reduced. In our opinion, although prisoner Ding was rewarded during the period of commutation and parole review, his property punishment was not completed.

The court ruled that the sentence would not be reduced. The court held that although prisoner Ding received certain rewards during the commutation assessment period, his property punishment was not fulfilled, and the commutation should be strictly controlled. According to the performance of the reform, the crime situation and the provisions of Articles 78 and 79 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and the second paragraph of Article 273 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the sentence will not be reduced.