Korean painters copy Japanese painters. What exactly happened?

As we all know, Han Man is developing rapidly now, and plagiarism is easy to occur in the process of development. No, a Korean painter played a plagiarism joke on the Internet. The painter copied the works of a Japanese painter, and as a result, he brazenly marked the words "no second creation" and "no copying" on his copied paintings, thinking that others would want his copied paintings. This painter has no face, and now he is insulted by Japanese netizens. Let's make a detailed analysis as follows:

Korean painters copied it intact. In Riman, there was a painter named ugi who posted his masterpiece on the channel with the caption "Blooming", which means flowers are blooming. If you are an unfamiliar audience, at first glance, you may think that this Korean painter's painting skills are not bad, the background behind him is beautiful, and his sister is very cute. However, eagle-eyed netizens soon discovered that the picture of the Korean painter was suspected of copying the picture of another Japanese painter. He even disdained to change the background, but only fine-tuned the characters as his own originality.

Bian Xiao brought you a plagiarized original picture. The character in the original picture is Elena, the protagonist of The Witch's Journey. We can find the window frame behind Elena, which is exactly the same as the window frame painted by a Korean painter. There is not much difference between the length of the black silk and the closeness of the knees. Ugi just changed the two red and yellow flowers in the original vase into two small blue flowers, removed the castle in the background, and then changed Elena's appearance into his original work, which was also posted on the Internet.

Ironically, plagiarists don't want to be copied, which is common among artists, but most plagiarism is hidden, except ugi. Ugi subscripts "No Commercialization", "No Secondary Processing" and "No Commercial Order" on his account. He forbade others to use his own paintings, but copied them. It's really a slap in the face. The "three noes" of Korean painters are not incomprehensible. After all, he is suspected of copying other works. If Erchuang or the merchants spread his paintings, the lawyer's letters may be piled up at home.

Ugi, a Korean painter who copied from Japan, has 23,000 fans, including Koreans, Japanese and even China. After he was exposed to plagiarism, the comment area was immediately besieged by Japanese netizens. Some Korean netizens talked with Japanese netizens who accused him of plagiarism on the grounds of helping their relatives but not helping them, while our netizens in China watched. Later, because ugi stood up again and again, even Koreans couldn't come back. Finally, his comment area was full of sunspots.

The Korean painter has apologized, but said that he only borrowed this Korean painter named ugi. He couldn't stand the internet storm and locked the comment area. However, the lock will not be locked for a while. If he wants to continue his career as an artist, he must pass this obstacle. So ugi officially apologized recently, but his statement was rather evasive. First of all, he admitted that he had "consulted" the illustrations of "The Witch's Journey", but when the conversation turned, he said that he had not completely followed. Moreover, he also said that he only referred to the illustration of "Journey of the Witch" with a learning attitude, and it was not used for business.

In other words, in order to practice painting, Korean painters found a Riman illustration, recreated the background composition, drew their own original characters, and then posted them on the Internet to show off, only to be considered plagiarism by netizens. His reasons can be said to be sufficient or insufficient. Ugi is not commercially available and belongs to the field of practice. However, he posted the painting on the Internet, which indirectly attracted a group of fans, who would also give him money, so he indirectly made money by copying.

Summary:

Ugi, a Korean painter, plagiarized Japanese illustrations, which aroused public anger. In fact, there is nothing wrong at all. Their own paintings are not allowed to be commercialized and re-created, and they are full of copyright awareness. As a result, he has no copyright awareness of other people's paintings at all. After copying it, he posted it online again. The double label is so annoying. what do you think?