The rider received eight orders from the same person, but after delivery, his mentality collapsed: it is not easy to make some money.

The rapid development of the Internet has brought earth-shaking changes to people's food, clothing, housing and transportation, and people can enjoy many things without going out. For example, at home or in the company, you can enjoy food just by clicking your mobile phone, which is very convenient. Now the most famous takeaway software is Hungry and Meituan. Some people who like takeout will inevitably send takeout, and they are also busy.

They are a very large group, mainly making a living by ordering. Therefore, no matter whether it is windy or rainy, you can see them running around, and it is not easy to make money. In addition, they are sometimes fined for various problems, and sometimes a ticket is wasted all day.

"Hungry?" This happened to Master Wang, a hummingbird crowdsourcing rider. Compared with other tickets, his situation is more unfair. Because I received eight orders from the same customer on the same day, I was considered to have swiped the bill by the platform, and not only was I fined 160 yuan, but the connection list was also greatly restricted.

The rider received eight orders from the same person.

About the cause of this matter, we should start from a rice noodle shop. When Master Wang was watching the news that he was hungry and took orders, he suddenly found that eight orders in the same store had the same delivery address, and he took them all without thinking. At that time, he felt lucky and went to the merchant to pick up the goods, and then he quickly sent these orders to the customers. What he didn't expect was that when he opened his mobile phone to take orders the next day, he received a penalty notice from the platform. The platform thinks that there is something wrong with his eight orders, and there is a phenomenon of brushing. Punishing him directly not only restricted his orders these days, but also fined him 160 yuan. The so-called brushing list actually refers to the behavior that the rider cooperates with the merchants or customers to make profits from the platform by using false delivery notes.

Was fined and collapsed.

Master Wang disapproved of such punishment, so he went to this store to take a video of his own meal and appealed through the platform. The customer service of the platform denied his complaint on the grounds that the receipt was abnormal and the rider did not call the customer. The final result shows that the appeal failed. As for the reply from customer service, Master Wang didn't recognize it at all. For him, these areas are delivered every day, and he knows how to deliver them with his eyes closed. As for not calling customers, it is mainly to save some phone bills. After all, he delivered them directly to customers. Later, under the condition that merchants and Master Wang provided a large amount of evidence and the platform manually audited, his innocence was finally proved, and the fine of 160 yuan for Master Wang and the restriction on taking orders were cancelled, which was also considered as returning Master Wang's innocence.

In fact, in real life, situations like Master Wang are very common. He is not the first person to encounter this situation, nor is he the last person to encounter this situation. For Master Wang, it is right to protect his legitimate income and the platform theory. Similarly, for the platform, it is also true that it is also something you have to do to combat the phenomenon of brushing. After all, they have been thinking about it and have been trying to kill the problem of brushing. But according to some suspicious circumstances, it is not a wise choice to punish others. Although problems can be found as early as possible to some extent, it is not advisable to injure others by mistake. The most important thing is to improve the reasonable mechanism.