He smiles like Tom Toldit, and he is very humorous.

Judging from the way Tom laughed when he told it (jokes and the like), it should be very interesting.

Explanation:

1. The action indicated by the non-predicate verb judge as an adverbial occurs at the same time as the main sentence action, that is, "its funny state and judging this action exist at the same time", instead of "judging first, then being funny".

Therefore, it is excluded that b and b are the perfect participle juding, which means that the action of judgment occurs before the predicate action of the main sentence is intended. ...

D Use prepositional phrases, that is, judging from ... is regarded as a gerund structure, and after is regarded as a preposition.

At this point, it shows that its relationship with judge is active, which does not conform to the meaning of the sentence, and it should be "it is judged from ……";

Second, it also shows that the judgment happened before the intention ... wrong.

3. Judging from/by ... is a fixed collocation, which means "judging from/by ...".

If you use it as an adverbial of a sentence, you don't have to consider the subjective/passive relationship between the subject of the sentence and judge, just use judging from/by ... Don't say that the relationship between the subject of the sentence and judge is passive, use its past participle judged.

This is a special phenomenon that the landlord needs to remember.

Another example: judging from his clothes, he is poor.

Judging from his clothes, he is poor.

At this time, you must not use judgment as an adverbial from ... because there is a passive relationship between the sentence subject he and judge.