As a soldier, why is 160 enough? The image of a soldier representing the country is too short to stand out and not be laughed at by foreigners. How does he defend his country? I think

The height of a soldier is not important. In fact, 160 is also for the coordination and unification of troops and the convenience of using standard weapons and equipment. If you are a special talent in a certain field or in a special period, there is no limit to your height. For example, the special forces facing Southeast Asia are shorter in order to integrate into other forces. Moreover, the army does not exist for face. The most important duty of the army is to be able to fight and win the battle. In actual war, it is easier to get shot if it is too big, and it needs more energy and bunker protection. Physical coordination is not as good as short people. In real war, tall people are at a disadvantage, and hand-to-hand combat with advantages is almost invisible. The troops must put on airs with the guards of honor. If it is seen in newspapers or movies, it can only be said that it is only an artistic effect and has no practical value. Besides, there seems to be a maximum height requirement for conscription. I remember it was reported for some time that there was no minimum limit, and the maximum limits were 178 and 183.