Ten years later, did the Iraqi people regret it?

More than a decade ago, I learned from official reports that Saddam Hussein was an executioner, and his hands were stained with the blood of the Iraqi people. Today, due to anti-American needs, I asked the Iraqi people if they regretted it. Joke!

If a person is seriously ill, it is necessary to scrape the bones to cure the poison. In the process of treatment, it is painful. It is good to suffer a little. As we often say, how can we see a rainbow without experiencing wind and rain!

The fact is that the Iraqi people who have been deprived of their sovereignty can't even say whether they regret it. Sovereignty is the right to express collective will, without sovereignty. Does it matter what you think? We outsiders can take what this Iraqi said as a count, and I can take the opinion of another Iraqi who holds the opposite opinion as a representative. Who can represent Iraq and who can call it true? This is how they live.

The United States accused Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction, but when the American troops invaded Baghdad, the Iraqi capital, there were not many * * * and national guards. So far, no so-called weapons of mass destruction have been found.

Where are the weapons of mass destruction? Is aggression based on lies justified? I don't know how much the Iraqi people regret it, but I know it is a model for a great power to defeat a country's territory. Lies are no longer mentioned. Is it true that "democracy" has been exchanged through decades of war and blood?

A hegemonic country bypassed the United Nations and brazenly invaded a sovereign country. Abandoning this idea, the United States is a rogue country and a paper tiger. Only when the new China resists US aggression and aid Korea and independently confronts the United Nations forces can there be time and space for peaceful development.

Although there are indeed many problems in the countries under the leadership of Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi, no progress has been made in national construction after the overthrow by force. On the contrary, the forces are divided, the country is in turmoil, the national life is not as good as before, and security is out of the question. It can be seen that fist can't solve all problems, it is just a deterrent to solve problems peacefully!

In any case, Saddam Hussein is an Iraqi. If you want to overthrow his tyranny, you can't rely on the United States. I don't know how many times the number of Iraqi civilian casualties in the Iraq war was that in Saddam's time, but they were all civilians. What the United States wants in sending troops to Iraq is not democracy in Iraq, but wealth in Iraq. Once the United States intervenes, it is difficult for you to drive it away, and even the Lord can do nothing.

Iraq is a textbook that has taught the whole world, especially China. Americans are not gods or saviors, but demons with bibles in their hands. If you lead a wolf into the room, there will be no bones left, let alone national dignity and national dignity, let alone the national economy, and the people will only struggle in dire straits. Saddam Hussein is bad, violent and dictatorial. Did you see it with your own eyes? I believe that most people here have never seen it. Americans started the war by seeking public support and imposing sanctions, which made their own people complain. Over time, good things will turn into bad things. After all, ordinary people's hearts are just for eating, drinking and having fun. Similarly, we haven't seen it with our own eyes now, and we can only get information oriented by public opinion. Of course, either the author or the author is definitely wrong. But I think in the past decade or so, as long as the United States is involved. Nothing good.

When Saddam was in power, GDP ranked in the top ten in the world, medical education and housing were free, and oil-rich countries lived and worked in peace and contentment. Pro-American factions used this to promote democracy rather than dictatorship, leading wolves into the room. Now it is devastated and completely reduced to a fourth world country.

I'm sorry I didn't see it, but the Iraqi people are free, and no one is responsible for fighting with guns everywhere, killing people and setting fires. Living on the road of war every day seems very busy and full. Whether they want to live this life or not, it doesn't matter. If they are weak, they will be defeated. They feel uncertain about their fate. In Saddam's time, Iraqi civilians could have a guarantee of life. Is life in Iraq secure now? I want to ask the Iraqi people. Don't ask that Iraqi American. Because Iraqi-Americans live in America, not Iraq. They live in America. Do they know anything about the life of the Iraqi people?

The Iraqi people have already regretted it. A country where the blessed don't know how to be blessed has ruined its own rice bowl! This is the result of foreigners' anti-state support. Leaders of their own countries distrust and trust western countries. Nowadays, people live an inhuman life, and life is not guaranteed. What is more important than life? All the chaos is caused by foreigners' intervention, and western countries are only for the benefit. Who cares if you are doing well? China is vigilant, the people should unite, and only when there is a country can there be a home!

Even if Saddam and Gaddafi die unexpectedly, they will not bring down the country. The transfer of power will select successors who are consistent with their own ideas and maintain the stability of the country. Thirdly, no matter from which aspect, the United States belongs to the aggressor, and the common people suffer. Without war, at least most people can live in peace and prosperity, at least not like this; Finally, even if Saddam and Gaddafi are in power, it should be overthrown by their own people, not the United States. The American invasion of Iraq has brought unprecedented disasters to the Iraqi people, who are still fidgeting and living in dire straits. Countries' affairs are solved by their own people. This is the right way on earth. Saddam Hussein is cruel, and the Iraqi people will eventually overthrow him. Don't finance American aggression.

It is true that the Iraqi people have no regrets, and the decision is made by the Americans, not the Iraqi people. It is one thing to oppose Saddam Hussein's government, and it is another to let Americans smash their relatives and homes. Besides, there are more than ten years of sanctions from the Gulf War to the Iraq War. Does this sanction distinguish Saddam Hussein's government from the Iraqi people? Americans have achieved their goals, but unfortunately for the Iraqi people. The Iraqi people have been chosen. Why not regret it?