How to treat Guizhou University's response to students' questioning of unfair competition?

On April 28th, a female contestant questioned the unfair competition and thought that the judges were biased. The reason is that there were nine students in a jury at that time, but seven of them were selected, and several of them played badly and could not reach the level of selection at all. As a result, Chai Yongxing, vice chairman of Guizhou Federation of Literary and Art Circles, angrily denounced on the spot: What are you? However, the female players still insist on their own opinions and let the judges check the scores. Another judge at the scene said:? What is unfair? If you feel unfair, don't participate. ? Later, some judges even said:? Whose student are you? I'll find out. ?

Once the video was released, it became a hot topic on the Internet, which caused many college students to curse. In the face of public opinion, on May 1, Chai Yongxing apologized for the attitude of the media when asked, and claimed that an investigation team had been set up to conduct a detailed investigation of the competition. Regarding the questions raised by the players at that time, Chai Yongxing said that other referees also had students present, which would not have much impact on the fairness of the game.

? Judging from Chai Yongxing's response, they are actually not serious, just doing superficial work to cope with online public opinion. After all, he was one of the judges himself, and he also had some knowledge of other judges and students. How could he not know? And in the face of players' doubts, the first time is to choose force to oppress people, even threats. There's obviously something wrong with it.

? Moreover, many referees present did not think about solving the problem after hearing the players' doubts, and either chose to watch jokes or bully others. What's the point of taking part in such a competition? As judges, they don't even have the minimum moral quality. How can they make a fair judgment?

? Now many competitions are like this, not by strength, but by interpersonal relationships. Whoever has reliable interpersonal relationships will be able to enter the finals. If we can't strengthen the supervision and management of the competition, then similar competitions will only be less and less credible, and will no longer be a place for selecting talents, but an occasion for players to show off their interpersonal relationships. I hope the Musicians' Association can make a fair investigation and give the performers a convincing conclusion.