Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - How to write a story about "the wind and the horse"
How to write a story about "the wind and the horse"
During the Western Zhou Dynasty, Zhou Wangzhao was ambitious, but in his later years he ignored state affairs and lived a luxurious life. In order to conquer the barbarian tribes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River who did not obey the Zhou royal family, he conquered Chu twice and crossed the Hanshui River each time. There is no risk in exploring the south for the first time.
When crossing the Han River for the second time, the local people built a big boat for King Zhao of Zhou. People hate the fatuous Zhao Haoqi, so this boat is made of glue. When the ship sailed into the river, the glue decomposed when it met with water, and the ship fell apart. King Zhao of Zhou, his ministers and officers and men all fell into the water and died.
During the Spring and Autumn Period, Qi Huangong, one of the vassal states, appointed Guan Zhong as the prime minister and became the overlord of the Central Plains. Qi was very dissatisfied with Chu in the south, so the expedition to the south was not divided into excuses, and he was ready to unite with the seven northern countries to attack Chu. King Chu Cheng knew the news and felt that Qi was an unreasonable aggression. Then he assembled an army and asked Qu to ask.
Seeing this, he asked, "You live in the north, and I live in the south, far apart. Even if we run freely and chase each other like cattle and horses, we can't run to each other's territory. Why did you come all the way to invade our country? "
Qi Xianggong replied, "In the past, we asked Kang Gong to order our ancestors to say that no matter who he was or how high his position was, if he was guilty, we had the right to punish him to assist the Zhou Dynasty. Zhao Kanggong also gave our ancestors the scope to conquer: east to the seaside, west to the Yellow River, south to Muling, and north to Wudi.
Your Chu state did not pay tribute to the king of Zhou all the year round, so that the sacrificial supplies of the royal family of Zhou could not be supplied. Today we are here to pay tribute to you for the Zhou royal family. Besides, it's what you did that King Zhao of Zhou drowned in the Hanshui River. You have committed this heinous crime, and all the vassal States are very angry. We're here to ask you about it. Then he listed some "crimes" of Chu State and showed off his arrogance to the end.
After listening to this, Qu stood up slowly and replied, "If what Guan Yu said is true, we didn't pay tribute on time, it may be because the king of Chu was busy and neglected for a while, so we will pay tribute on time in the future." * * * It is our duty to help Zhou Wang. How dare Chu refuse to pay tribute? As for the drowning of Zhao Zhouwang by Hanshui, you might as well ask Hanshui. "
Guan Zhong was speechless for a moment, and then threatened to say, "Look, the strength of our various governors uniting together is so strong that you Chu can't resist it at all." Unexpectedly, he humbly replied, "it's too young for you to say so." If we rely on force, we Chu will take Fangcheng as the wall and Hanshui as the moat. Even if more troops come, you may not be able to beat them. "
After a few words, Guan Zhong, who is famous for his eloquence, was also refuted with nothing to say. See ChuJun so strong and well-prepared, Qi Huangong dare not make a move. After weighing the pros and cons, he had to withdraw his troops and return home.
- Related articles
- Boxing joke
- Wang Sicong and Wilber Pan are in the same box, but there is no interaction between them. What happened?
- Huang Mao tells jokes.
- Is Zhu Chen's husband married again?
- As the old saying goes, "Men don't touch their heads and women don't touch their feet." What happens if you accidentally touch them?
- How to say "Happy birthday to you" in Liulin dialect of Luliang, Shanxi?
- Classic Quotations of Post-80s Talk Show
- How did Degang Guo respond to Guo Qilin's support for Deyun Society?
- What is a romantic joke?
- Is it useful not to admit it without evidence?