Why is it difficult to eliminate Mexican drug lords? What is the root behind it?

As the saying goes, every family has its own problems, such as Mexican drug dealers, South Korean chaebol and Indian caste system, which are the most troublesome problems in their respective countries. Mexico was messed up by drug dealers, South Korea was controlled by chaebol, and India's caste system blocked the way for the bottom people to climb up.

So, as far as the status quo of these three countries is concerned, whose problem is easier to solve?

Mexico should be the easiest to eliminate drug dealers. As long as the government is willing to break the wrist of a strong man and make great efforts to eliminate it, it can be eliminated. Drug trafficking in Colombia was much more serious than that in Mexico. Pablo, the drug Lord, even dared to go against the government, bombing civil aviation planes and attacking Congress. Everything came, but it was not destroyed.

However, the so-called simplicity is relative. Because there must be a premise to eliminate Mexican drug dealers, and that is the support of the United States. As the saying goes, doing nothing is harmless. As the largest drug market in the world, the United States has always been the food and clothing parents of Latin American drug lords.

Of course, it's not that the U.S. government doesn't want to eliminate these drug lords. After all, drug abuse is also a huge social problem in America. However, because of the needs of the American market, drug dealers cannot get rid of them. Before, the United States helped the Colombian government eradicate drug trafficking groups, thinking that things could be settled. As a result, Mexico began to become a new source of drugs on a larger scale.

Although drug dealers in Mexico are not as armed and ferocious as those in Colombia. But they have better living soil and larger networks.

First of all, Mexico's declining agricultural economy has caused a large number of farmers to fall into difficulties, and the huge profits brought by drug cultivation just meet their needs. In addition, Mexico is adjacent to the United States, and the rich smuggling channels on the US-Mexico border have won the favor of the US drug market.

In addition, coupled with the corrupt political environment in Mexico, drug lords not only make more money, but also have a much better living environment. These are the important reasons why drug dealers in Mexico are rampant at present.

However, this can't blame Mexico. The problem is actually America. If it weren't for the impact of American agricultural products, Mexican farmers wouldn't go bankrupt and grow drugs instead. If it weren't for the demand of American drug addicts, drug dealers in Mexico wouldn't be so rampant.

More importantly, the United States has adopted a deliberate laissez-faire attitude towards the current situation of Mexican drug dealers. Because they found that even if Mexican drug dealers were severely cleaned up, they would still suffer. Because the drug market in our country is there, the direct result of cracking down on Mexican drug dealers is that the drug market in the United States has lost its drug source, and driven by interests, the drug source will turn to the United States.

At that time, the anti-drug agencies in the United States will not only have to worry about drug abuse and drug trafficking, but also make drugs, and the burden will be even greater. Therefore, based on the principle of giving priority to ensuring its own interests, the United States will turn a blind eye.

So generally speaking, it is not difficult to eliminate Mexican drug dealers, but it is difficult to eliminate the drug market in the United States. American dignitaries have always had it? The United States is sick and other countries take medicine? Bad style, throwing problems that are obviously caused by Americans to other countries, and never facing up to their own problems. With such an unreasonable neighbor, the drug problem in Mexico cannot be solved in a short time.

As for the elimination of South Korea's chaebol, it is more difficult. After all, the scale of South Korea's chaebol is there. If nothing else, let's talk about the Samsung Group that everyone is most familiar with. This big consortium whose income can account for 20% of South Korea's GDP is almost everywhere in South Korea. They control many economic lifelines in South Korea, and their influence is amazing.

In addition to Samsung Group, South Korea also has consortia such as Hyundai Group, LG Group and SK Group, which control almost 80% of South Korea's wealth, and Koreans are inseparable from these chaebol. And its management is family-style, and the top-down pyramid allows a few people to control a lot of wealth and power.

Would you like to be the boss of Samsung instead of the president of South Korea? This is no joke.

In a word, the size of South Korean chaebol determines their status, and they are almost controlling South Korea in another way. Even the South Korean government is more or less influenced and even manipulated by them. Too big to be true is the status quo of Korean chaebol.

Therefore, it is very difficult to eliminate the Korean chaebol. Unless the existing social system in Korea is subverted, such as a bottom-up revolution, everything will be overthrown. As we all know, there are many precedents in the world, but these are not so easy, because most chaebol in South Korea have American background. The United States has invested a lot in them, and obviously it will not watch its money go to waste.

In fact, objectively speaking, under the current system, the life of Koreans is still good. But this kind of leek in Korea is much more moist than most leeks, such as Mexico. Koreans are still content with the status quo from the heart, far from the point of full-scale war with the chaebol.

However, nothing is absolute. Maybe one day the poor brothers from the north of Korea come over and the chaebol will be finished.

Finally, it should be the most difficult to eliminate the caste system in India, because it cannot be solved by a war or regime change. The caste system has a history of thousands of years in India, and it exists on the basis of religion. It is not only deeply rooted, but also has a wide influence.

You know, nearly 80% of India's population are Hindus, with more than one billion people. They have been passively or actively instilled with the concept of caste system from birth, exposed to various influences brought by caste system since childhood, and then solidified this concept, thinking that this is a normal system. Born unequal, in their view, it is right.

It's like we have accepted a series of ethical concepts such as benevolence, filial piety, propriety and righteousness instilled by Confucianism for two thousand years, and take them for granted. You should respect the old and love the young, and you should be loyal to the monarch and patriotic. Even thanks to the blessing of religious atmosphere, India's caste system should be more deeply rooted in people's hearts, which violates not only the question of right and wrong, but also punishment. This is like the double constraint of morality and law, which makes people unwilling and afraid to violate it.

The so-called princes and princes, what would you rather have? In the eyes of Indians, it was a great rebellion. Now, although the Indian government has pulled out the thorns left on the surface of Indian skin, the roots of caste system are intact because of the existence of Hinduism.

Things at the ideological level have always been serious. Why doesn't the Indian government try one?

Of course, it is not that the caste system in India cannot be eliminated, but that this process must be difficult and long. First of all, you need to dilute your religious consciousness, or religion changes your teachings so that you are not bound by this religious law. Secondly, you need to break the status barrier between high caste and low caste, mix them together and treat them equally. This is the most difficult, because people of high caste are unwilling to give up their sense of superiority. The only possibility is that people of low caste struggle on their own and become equal to people of high caste.

But this is hard to say. India is a country with serious polarization, with 300 million elites, 10 million illiterate, and its basic education is very backward. People with low castes have already lost at the starting line, and they have to face the squeeze and exclusion of people with high castes, and it is even more difficult to achieve transcendence. I don't think you'll ever see it again.