What do you think about Qi Pa said that the topic of the debate is "Should mothers be stopped from crazy about supporting male celebrities?"

The topic of the debate is that my mother is crazy about supporting male celebrities. Should I stop her? At the beginning, 60 people chose not to block and 40 people chose to block. The debaters from both sides had a very interesting and powerful debate. Some of the debaters' views deeply moved the audience, and the votes were closely tied between the two sides.

The three debaters on the negative side all talk about talk shows, and the pros are two professional debaters and one Internet celebrity. Every time Xiaolu debates, he is full of jokes and has profound arguments. It can be said that he has completed his own ideas during the audition. During the audition, she said that many talk show actors gave up on debates, and she wanted to come back and not be nailed to the pillar of shame. If the strength is not enough, then there will be one more of her on the pillar of shame. Xiaolu’s broadcast videos from the auditions are all excellent, adding a lot of excitement to this year’s program.

The positive side is an Internet celebrity who steps on the bell, but she is very powerful. As a doctoral student at the University of London, she does not show off her knowledge and qualifications on the Internet. She only relies on chatting with everyone to attract everyone's attention crazily. Many things she talked about were full of interest. He also performed very well on the stage of Qi Pa Shuo, and his jokes and opinions were all unique.

The most impressive thing in the debate was Feng Xiaotong, who defended the second argument, with his chubby body and frequent laughter. One of his views was very touching. He said that the reason behind mothers' crazy support for celebrities is probably the lack of love for their mothers by their children. He made the audience laugh in the beginning, and finally drew the final argument from his relationship with his mother. He choked up and moved the audience.

Huang Zhizhong theoretically analyzed the situation of different words in the defense question, and based his argument on the need to block the mother's crazy support. She can support but not crazy. Huang Zhizhong was different from other contestants in that he had no laughs during the debate. But the rhythm of his words and sounds guides the audience's emotions into his arguments. Professor Xue Zhaofeng changed his stance because of his debate, from never blocking to wanting to block. But after reading the comments from netizens who posted the comments, they said they couldn't listen to his preaching. This kind of debate that rationally disassembles and analyzes the topic is shocking, but it lacks some emotional warmth.

What impressed me most were the statements of Professor Cai Kangyong and Professor Liu Qing. Cai Kangyong said softly that his parents no longer had the health to do some crazy things in their lives. Parents of the younger generation can still have some time and money to go crazy. Many old people only recall the past because they have neither present nor future, or because of family reasons or ideological issues, they may have been living for others. If they can find what they love and integrate into the era, they will not stop it. Professor Liu Qing also said that the definition of "crazy" is not clear because the definitions of first-person and third-person are not unified standards. Only by allowing others to make mistakes without violating the law can extreme behaviors be marginalized.

This debate saw Professor Xue’s rational view of things, Cai Kangyong’s warm expressions, Li Dan’s seemingly absurd but profound views, and Professor Liu Qing’s broader views. It has to be said that it was a feast . Of course, the contestants’ various funny jokes are indispensable, which is very exciting.