Why is the income of China 1000 academicians not as good as that of a performer?

Film culture is a monopoly, and monocultural actors certainly have high incomes. Now I think it's a joke to punish others for their high income, and they haven't broken the law. Look carefully at two points:

First, if the country completely opens up film and television, I think the income of actors in China should not be high. It would be even worse if the censorship was cancelled. Who will watch the bad movies in your palace and harem and go straight to AV? In fact, this is the inevitable result of the monopoly of film and television culture. But it is impossible to completely liberalize, because we are a socialist country.

Second, increase tax control. As a monopoly industry, film and television culture must increase personal income tax on film and television. The reason is that the state monopolizes you, so you must pay for the social and economic injustice caused by monopoly. There is no industry in the world that relies on state monopoly but does not pay taxes for the country, such as tobacco, alcohol, state-owned enterprises, central enterprises, education, medical care, tap water, electricity and so on. China's film and television culture is out of this ignorance of the government and society. Of course, the actors are going to get rich. I can tell you that any industry with unusually high income in China is a monopoly industry in the rules of the market economy game, and the monopoly industry has not paid for its national tax obligations.