The security guard locked the delivery man's neck with a steel fork. Why is the security guard competent but not understood?

Because netizens don't care whether the security guard is competent or not, they only care about the first impression of the incident. Objectively speaking, there is something wrong with the wind direction of this matter. People's first impression of things is subjective. Most people first saw that the security guard had clamped the takeaway with a steel fork, so at first glance they thought that the security guard had bullied the takeaway brother. Even after understanding the cause of the incident, many netizens think that security is too much, because human beings are always used to standing on the other side of the weak and exerting their dignity.

1, this matter should not be biased towards only one side. The reason for the dispute between the security guard and the deliveryman is that the deliveryman refuses to cooperate with the epidemic prevention registration. This has happened now. If it had happened a few months ago, everyone in the comments would have praised the title of security guard. Now, this situation is still not the time to relax. Occasionally, people from all over the world get pneumonia. It is reasonable for the security guard to ask him to cooperate with the registration. The delivery man doesn't want to waste time on registration, so

What people see is only the feeling that the delivery man is insulted, and even many people abuse the security guard in bad language, such as "the security guard is the dog who watches the door". It is these people who accuse the current security guards of being irresponsible, but when the security guards really make moves, these people are another face. You can think that the security guard's approach is too extreme, but you can't deny that he initially asked the other party to cooperate with the work. He judged who was weak only because who was at a disadvantage.

2. Rational thinking is not necessarily black or white. The occurrence of this incident and the trend of public opinion remind me of a piece of news in these two years. A kind uncle caught a man molesting a female passenger on the subway and slapped him several times. Public opinion began to develop in two directions. Some people think that this molester deserves a good slap, while others think that even though he is an obscene person, he still has human rights.

It is also wrong, because the mistake made by this takeaway brother is obviously much lighter than that of the defamatory, so the netizen directly ignores whether the security guard's approach is correct, thus directly standing on the seemingly weak takeaway side. If this is the case, after seeing this news, security guards everywhere will silently take care of takeout and casually enter and leave the community, and this state will be complained by residents. Do you think the security guards care?

In essence, no one in the local chronicles is absolutely right or wrong. The security guard is not as bad as everyone thinks, we don't need to be insulted like that, and the delivery man is not so innocent. Many things are never black and white, so we don't have to take sides. We should think about the problems that need attention from a neutral perspective in order to make progress in this society.