Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - What should I pay attention to when going to Michelin for an interview?

What should I pay attention to when going to Michelin for an interview?

This question involves the main points that should be paid attention to in the interview, not only in Michelin company interviews, but also in all company interviews:

(a), do a good job of preparation before the test.

The materials to be prepared before the interview generally include the following contents:

(1) resume;

(2) pen and paper (convenient for temporary recording of some contents);

(3) Education certificate (diploma, degree certificate);

(4) Proof of other work skills.

In addition, knowing more about the company and position before the interview will help improve the interview pass rate. Before the interview, we should also investigate the bus route as deeply as possible to ensure that we can attend the interview on time.

(2), matters needing attention

Matters needing attention in the interview process can be briefly summarized as follows:

(1) Pay attention to the interview dress;

(2) Pay attention to interview etiquette;

(3) Eye contact with the interviewer;

(4) relax your mind;

(5) Show your advantages in place.

(3), taboo:

First, avoid asking about the number of recruiters. The most obvious thing is to ask, "How many do you want?" For employers, recruiting one is a trick, and recruiting ten is also a trick. The question is not to recruit a few, but whether you have this one or ten percent or unique strength and competitiveness. "Do you want a woman?" Women who ask this question give themselves a "discount" first, which is a sign of unconfidence.

Second, avoid asking questions quickly.

"How is your treatment?" "Do you eat and live? Will the telephone and bus fees be reimbursed? " Some applicants are eager to ask these questions as soon as they meet, which not only makes the other party disgusted, but also makes the other party have the bad idea of "asking for conditions when the work is not done well, not to mention that I haven't said I want you yet". It is your right to talk about remuneration, which is understandable. The key is to seize the opportunity. Generally, when both parties have a preliminary employment intention, they will put it forward euphemistically.

Third, avoid illogical.

The interviewer asked, "Please tell me about one of your failures." Answer: "I don't remember I failed." It doesn't make logical sense for you to say so. Another example is that the examiner asks, "What are your strengths and weaknesses?" Answer: "I can do all the work." This is also unrealistic.

Fourth, avoid saying that you have acquaintances.

In the interview, I was eager to befriend, regardless of sincerity, saying things like "I know people in your company" and "I am classmates with someone and have a good relationship". Such words will disgust the examiner. If the person you are talking about is his immediate superior, the examiner will think that you are bullying others; If the examiner doesn't have a good relationship with the person you mentioned, or even has contradictions, then the results you lead out are likely to be caused by yourself.

Fifth, avoid going beyond the scope

For example, at the end of the interview, the examiner asked the job seeker, "Do you have any questions for me?" The job seeker leaned over and asked, "How big is your business? What is your development plan for the next five years? " Questions like this. This is because the job seeker has not put himself in the right position, and the questions raised have gone beyond the scope that the job seeker should ask, which makes the examiner feel bored. The examiner may even think: Why are there so many questions? Are you here to apply for a job? Or to investigate the situation?

Sixth, avoid inappropriate rhetorical questions

For example, the examiner asks, "What are your salary expectations?" The applicant asked, "How much are you going to pay?" This rhetorical question is very impolite, as if it were a negotiation, and it is easy to cause the examiner's unhappiness and hostility.