I am urgently looking for the latest regulations and information on pension insurance for public institutions in Anhui Province in 2014.

Hello, the latest news on the social security reform of public institutions shows that social security in public institutions has been merged. If the nature of the unit remains unchanged and the security method is just in line with the enterprise, it does not make much sense; the latest news on the social security reform of public institutions shows that since If the guarantee is aligned with enterprises, then the source of income should also be "enterprise-oriented", that is, the public institutions should be market-oriented and weaned from the finance; if the public institutions take the money from the finance on the one hand, but on the other hand the guarantee is paid according to the enterprise method, it is simply a joke; First, change the state-owned nature of public institutions and make them real enterprises. Only on this basis can it make sense to discuss pension reform.

The latest news on the social security reform of public institutions

If public institutions still rely on finance after the integration of social security, it does not make much sense

If it is the way for public institutions to obtain income from enterprises In line with this, it is of great significance to no longer rely on finance, because it means that public institutions will move toward the market and become separated from the state. If the "guarantee methods" are just aligned with those of enterprises and the nature of public institutions remains unchanged, it would be meaningless.

Reporter: The State Council recently issued the "Personnel Management Regulations for Public Institutions". Starting from July, the wages and social security of public institutions and their staff will be in line with those of enterprises, and they will participate in social insurance in accordance with the law. It has attracted much attention because it involves 1.11 million public institutions and 31.53 million public service personnel across the country. What do you think?

Zhu Haijiu (Professor of Zhejiang Gongshang University): The key here is how to understand the phrase "align with enterprises", whether it is the way to obtain income or the social security itself. If public institutions obtain income in the same way as enterprises and no longer rely on finance, it would be of great significance, because it means that public institutions will move towards the market and become separated from the state. If it is just that the "security methods" are aligned with enterprises and the nature of public institutions remains unchanged, then it is meaningless, because this is just an expansion of the scope of "social security", and "social security", we know, is not desirable. The current social security implemented at the enterprise level can be said to be a failure.

The latest news on social security reform in public institutions shows that "social security" means using other people's money to support oneself, and one's own money to support others. First of all, it is ethically unfeasible; secondly, it is technically unfeasible. How does the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security know how much your income is, how much your assets are, and what level of security you need after retirement? These information problems are simply impossible to solve, so it is impossible to determine a reasonable level of security.

The latest news on social security reform in public institutions shows that the issue of security should be left to individuals. This is everyone's own business, not the government's business. Of course, companies can participate in solving the problem of employee protection, because in terms of information, the problems encountered by companies will be much smaller than that of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, which is aloof. Companies can provide employees with appropriate protection based on their own circumstances to attract talents, such as Google. , everyone knows that the level of protection is very high.

The current pension system reflects the relationship between income and power

The current pension system is a "hierarchical system". How much pension a person can receive is linked to his status. For civil servants and public institution employees, the pension is very high; for enterprise employees, it is much lower; for farmers, it is even less. It reflects the relationship between income and power (rent), rather than the relationship between contribution and size.

Reporter: In the past, employees of public institutions and civil servants did not have to pay social security, but pensions after retirement were borne by taxpayers, which were much higher than those of enterprise employees. It is very unfair. Although civil servants’ pensions are not integrated this time, are they a little more fair than before?

Zhu Haijiu: The current pension system is a “hierarchical system”. How much pension can a person get? tied to his identity. For civil servants and public institution employees, the pension is very high; for enterprise employees, it is much lower; for farmers, it is even less. This system of distinguishing different pension levels based on status is obviously unfair, because it reflects the relationship between income and power (rent), rather than the relationship between contribution and size.

The integration of pensions in public institutions and enterprises is equivalent to canceling the privileges in pensions to a certain extent and reducing the pensions enjoyed by retired employees of public institutions, which has positive significance. In terms of narrowing the pension gap, it becomes fair; in terms of using the same pension system, it is also fair. However, because this kind of security system used by *** is still unreasonable "social security", it is still unsatisfactory.

The latest news on the reform of public institutions: Public institutions should be market-oriented and weaned from finances

The latest news on the reform of public institutions shows that if public institutions still hold financial money on the one hand, on the other hand If the guarantee is paid according to the corporate method, it is simply a joke. Since the guarantee is aligned with enterprises, the source of income should also be "enterprise-oriented", that is, public institutions should be market-oriented and weaned from finance.

Reporter: Nowadays, most public institutions, such as hospitals and schools, use differential funding. Part of the salary of public institutions must be solved by scientific research, hospital income generation, school enrollment expansion, etc. Some people think that this will lead to the loss of public institutions. Arbitrary charges affect the quality of public services. What do you think of this view?

Zhu Haijiu: Some people worry that public institutions do not have enough sources of income to pay pensions, and finance at all levels are unwilling to pay for them, so public institutions will increase fees or charge arbitrarily. . This situation is possible if the state-owned nature of public institutions remains unchanged and the social security nature of pensions remains unchanged. As mentioned above, if the state-owned nature of public institutions is not fundamentally changed, the reform of the elderly care sector will be distorted and fail to achieve the intended goals.

Pensions can be regarded as part of income, and "reforming pensions" should actually be viewed in the context of "reforming sources of income." For those units with high incomes, the post-merger pensions are worthless, because their real estate and other assets are enough to guarantee their retirement. Therefore, if the income system is not reformed, reforming old-age care will not make much sense. In other words, the problem is not old-age care, but the legality and legitimacy of the income sources.

The latest news on the reform of public institutions shows that due to their monopoly power, employees in some public institutions have very high incomes. For example, pensions have dropped after the merger, but they can use their monopoly power to increase fees and compensate for it in the current period. return. Therefore, we must first change the state-owned nature of public institutions and allow them to enter the market and become real enterprises. Only on this basis can it make sense to discuss the pension issue.

It would be a joke if a public institution still takes money from the treasury on the one hand, but on the other hand the guarantee is paid according to the corporate method. Since the guarantee is aligned with enterprises, the source of income should also be "enterprise-oriented", that is, public institutions should be market-oriented and weaned from finance. Of course, the latest news on the reform of public institutions shows that charges are also determined by the market price of their services, so there is no problem of arbitrary charges.

The latest news on civil service reform shows that it is a good thing that the number of people applying for civil service has decreased and the attractiveness of government departments has decreased. It is difficult for a good woman to make a meal without rice, and security ultimately depends on the creation of wealth. Only when more people enter the real sector that creates wealth. Only when the wealth of society increases will there be real protection.

Reporter: At the same time, the "National Examination" is also cooling down. The number of civil servant applicants in 2014 dropped by 360,000 compared with last year. Moreover, under the pressure of anti-corruption, civil servants do not have so many benefits. Some civil servants said, "As long as civil servants' pensions are integrated, they will resign immediately." What do you think?

Zhu Haijiu: If pensions are integrated, the income of civil servants will It should be improved and made transparent. For example, Yiwu is piloting an appointment system for civil servants, with an annual salary of no less than 300,000 yuan. If the government cannot provide attractive salaries, no one will be a civil servant. It is beneficial to civil servants to have their income reflected directly in their annual salary, rather than in implicit and vague future pensions. Because in this way they are equivalent to breaking the shackles, and they do not have to be tied to the government department all the time. They can only get the remuneration (pension) they deserve until they retire. They should realize that "mobility" itself is an important right or benefit that they should have, but are just being deprived of it under the current retirement system. For the government, the annual salary system, supplemented by the assessment system, can also motivate civil servants to work hard.

The latest news on civil service reform shows that the number of people applying for civil servants has decreased, which is a good thing for the government departments to become less attractive. It is difficult for a good woman to make a meal without rice, and security ultimately depends on the creation of wealth. Only when more people enter the real sector that creates wealth. Only when the wealth of society increases will there be real protection.

I hope you will adopt it and wish you good luck