State-owned enterprises, are they really that terrible?

When I first entered the state-owned enterprise, there was one thing that puzzled me.

At that time, I was a technical post, responsible for a professional equipment.

Under normal circumstances, it is necessary to expose the broken equipment, analyze the cause of the failure, and then find a solution accordingly.

But in fact, the more serious the fault, the more leaders will cover it up. The way to deal with the fault is to deal with it temporarily or even not. Passing the buck is someone else's problem, not your own.

I don't understand: isn't it that the more serious the fault is, the more attention should be paid to it and it should be dealt with immediately? The fault will not recover because it is overwritten!

It's like seeing a doctor when you're sick. A minor illness can be solved without telling your family. If it is a serious illness, tell your family quickly, and we will face it together and find a way. This is an effective way to stop loss.

Why on earth is this?

Later, after staying in the company for a long time, I finally know the reason: if the major fault is known by the superior, the superior will not help, but will assess that our maintenance is not in place. ...

Colleagues often complain: As a production department, we shouldn't have an accident, and if something happens, we will be rewarded with deduction points? no way

What a great irony this is!

The bottom production department has only responsibilities and obligations, but no interests and rights. The superior department can have all kinds of assessment rights without any responsibility and obligation.

Unequal rights and responsibilities will inevitably lead to opaque information. Information is opaque, how can we really do things well and eliminate all kinds of hidden dangers in the cradle?

Under this abnormal management system, in order to keep their jobs, leaders at all levels will strictly control the export of information, eliminate information that is unfavorable to them, and exaggerate information that is beneficial to them. In the end, the information and facts at the end have long been separated from each other.

So there is such a joke: if a company goes bankrupt, the chairman will be the last person to know the news.

I understand that this management method with unequal powers and responsibilities and opaque information is wrong, but I still don't understand its cost.

If a state-owned enterprise has a problem, and every department is an ostrich, and it is afraid of taking responsibility, how can enterprises form competitiveness?

If every state-owned enterprise is so uncompetitive, how can our motherland face the complicated world situation in the future?