Reflections on 2012 How to write an English composition

[2012 English After Viewing] A sample English essay about 2012 movie review: Movie 2012, a famous movie made in USA, which was shown in China last month. 2012 This movie is American A famous movie that started showing in China a few months ago, What I have to admit is that this movie is wonderful, such as its advanced digital video effect and the worry about the future of human beings. I have to admit that this movie is wonderful, such as its advanced digital video effect and the worry about the future of human beings. , such as its advanced digital special effects and awareness of concerns about the future of mankind, In fact we do not agree the result of this moive, 2012 English review. in which only but some scientists and political leaders can survive not common people . all of us have the right to survive, what the key reason of survive is not this man can offer a larger contribution to our society, because for a future rebuilding, everyone is important. In fact, I do not agree with the ending of the movie, that Even some scientists and high-ranking government officials survived, but not many civilians. We all have the right to survive. The reason why a person should survive does not depend on how much he can contribute to society. Because everyone is rebuilding society. are crucial in the process, another thing we have to remember, that is the development of creat China, in that movie the work of manufacturing the surviving ship was completed by China, this advice us that China is admitted by the world more and more. that is a fact. And so we should love our conutry, a great and powerful motherland can allow us a happy, safe life. In addition, we remember that China has received recognition from the whole world and has a strong The motherland can make our lives more stable and happy, so we should love China. After watching this movie I really needed time to figure out what to think of it. I heard a lady sharing her first comment to her friend That dog sure was ugly. What else was there to say? After a while I found outThe action was truly formidable. demonstrating the power of mother natur

e. Collapsing buildings, jumping flaming cars, planes falling down and manage to pull up a second before touchdown, it was a real trip and a feast for the eyes and ears. But then again the acting wasn't that good, a bit over the top . In one scene in the movie, where every wasted second could be the cause of a terrible disaster, waste their time beingROMANTIC! At times like that the acting became very juicy, making me think I was watching Titanic instead. One point of advise Do not take this movie too seriously. Its almost stuffed with jokes instead of showing us the real drama of an earth that is about to be destroyed. But keep this in mind and youll have a heck of a 2 hours and 40 minutes(!) in a movie that is made for the cinema. After watching this movie. I really needed time to figure it out. Come to think of it, I heard one of the first comments from a lady who shared it with her friend that it was definitely an ugly dog. , what else is there to say? After a while, I discovered that this action is truly powerful and shows the power of nature. Afterviewing "2012 English Afterviewing". Buildings collapsing, jumping burning cars, The plane fell down and managed to pull off the second one before landing, it was a real trip and a feast for the eyes and ears, but for once the acting was not very good, better than the top one in the movie, the scene was every wasted The second may be the reason for a terrible disaster, the romance they waste their time with is like times the acting became very juicy and made me feel like I was watching Titanic instead, which reminds me not to take this movie too seriously Heavy, it's almost overstuffed rather than showing us a real dramatic joke about being about to destroy the planet, but keep that in mind and you're going to have a heck of a 2 hours and 40 minutes in a movie that was made for a movie. This This movie contains almost all the elements of disaster movies, including huge earthquakes, super volcanoes, super tsunamis, floods that destroy the entire human race, the sinking and rising of land, the reversal of the earth's magnetic field, the destruction of cities, helpless people, and possibly My knowledge is limited. Anyway, there seems to be no disaster movie that can bring together so many disaster elements. It was probably the Japanese movie "The Sinking of Japan" in the 1980s. The concentration of disaster elements is slightly comparable to "2012" It is on par, but far from it, and the scenes and special effects are even less comparable. Watching this film, you rarely have a calm time to watch it, your eyes are filled with shocking disasters at any time, and all your thoughts are following the story of the film. The plot and the fate of the protagonist are turning. But these are just reasons that make me excited, not reasons that move me. My move comes from the brilliance of humanity in the film. Humanity, this word is really used when commenting on movies. There are too many, so many that they are overwhelming, but I still want to say that what moved me most about this film is human nature. This kind of human nature is broad and broad, has the courage to give, and does not hesitate to sacrifice one's life for others, and It’s not a narrow self, it’s not selfishness, it’s not someone who doesn’t care for himself and will be destroyed. In "2012", I can see the fragility of human life and human civilization, so strong and beautiful

The body, such exquisite buildings, and such tender feelings appear so powerless in the face of the violent power of nature. In a few seconds or minutes, they all disappear without a trace in the face of earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, and super floods. .But I also see that no matter what kind of huge natural force we face, human beings, or the family of the protagonist of the film as representatives of human beings, as well as those from national leaders to ordinary people, all show their will in the face of disasters. The dignity of mankind. When the disaster was destined to come, the President of the United States chose to stay in the United States and be with his people until the last moment. The captain did not want to abandon the sinking ship. This was his noble choice. The American in the film I completely agree with the officials’ evaluation of the president. At the last moment of the super flood, the leaders of various countries around the world who control the fate of tens of thousands of people outside the Ark, Dr. Redrian, we are all part of humanity. , human civilization is about helping each other create a better tomorrow. If we give up on them today, then even if we survive, how will we face our children, and how will the children face their children? A passionate speech , unanimously agreed to open the door of the Ark, and countless people rushed into the Ark with cheers. At that moment, no matter who they were or what their political stance was, I think they would all have a trace of warmth in their hearts. And those ordinary people, they fought for their own survival. The struggle and efforts made are even more worthy of our respect. In order for his family to get a ticket to enter the Ark, the male protagonist Jack drove a car crazily from Yellowstone National Park to Las Vegas. At the airport in Sri Lanka, amidst the huge fireworks that filled the sky with the volcanic eruption of Yellowstone Park, I found the crazy guy who was obsessed with fighting for the survival of the earth and was about to die without forgetting that he was the first to declare that the earth was over. He was falling into a huge crack again. After that, we climbed out and caught up with the taking-off plane. After the dramatic experience of the plane originally planning to make an emergency landing in the South China Sea but landing in Tibet, China, the whole family finally entered the Ark with the help of Tian Qing, a kind-hearted Chinese Ark staff member. At the end of the film, when Jack finally solved the mechanical failure at the tail of the Ark and the Ark started running smoothly, the family embraced each other with joy and sorrow. I think that Jack, as an ordinary person, showed the same great courage in the face of such a huge disaster. , it should not be said that it is for the common interests of all mankind (even if his approach does exactly this). He is different from Dr. Redrian. The doctor is indeed an idealist who puts the common interests of all mankind first. A character, and Jack, in ordinary times, was a little person running for life. When danger came, his incomparable bravery and wisdom were just for his relatives. But who can say, even if it is just for his relatives, his Are all these actions not worthy of our being touched and worthy of our paying tribute to him? Who can say that all his actions are not broad-minded, courageous to give and the glorious humanity of sacrificing his own life for others?