Which is better, film camera or SLR?

Question 1: What are the advantages of film cameras over digital cameras? In some areas, the current digital still can't replace film.

For example, the grain of film is unchanged, but with the increase of exposure time, the noise in the photos obtained by digital cameras will gradually increase. Therefore, in astrophotography and landscape photography with minute exposure, film is irreplaceable.

Due to the typesetting effect and other problems, at present, a few magazines such as National Geographic only accept the submission of reverse films, and it is estimated that it will take several years to fully accept digital photos.

A mid-range film camera customized by EOS5 is very valuable as a second-hand machine as long as it is around 500 yuan.

======

Discuss with friends on the first floor. In fact, when it comes to tolerance, movies are not necessarily good. Professional reverse films, especially things like Kodak, are actually a little underexposed, but the tolerance is actually only most black-and-white film and color negatives.

Question 2: Why is film better than SLR? As a staunch film user, I have a Pentax film SLR and a Pentax digital SLR. As a two-machine party, you have more say.

-Why use film?

Film is very cheap.

The cheapest Kodak color plus is basically a roll of 15. Count 36 and print 20 (scan the negatives yourself). The cost of a basic bill is 1 yuan, and the cost of an advanced profoto100,40 bill is less than that of 2 yuan.

Digital seems to have no cost, but how expensive is the machine? Even the price of a chartered plane is 7000 yuan. I bought my film machine from Japan, only 180 yuan, and it's still an antique from the 1970s, and its function is fine.

In addition, I will refrain from filming, because there are only 36 photos, and I will definitely not bump into continuous shooting. Besides, it is normal to shoot more than 200 digital photos at a time when I go out, and the time cost of going home to sort out photos is very high, which is annoying! ! The most important thing is that there are only 36 films, so I will carefully consider the exposure and composition before shooting, and whether this is what I want to shoot, so the success rate is very high. At present, I can basically achieve a film production rate of more than 50%, which I can never do digitally.

Film is the product of photography development for more than 0/00 years, which basically reaches the extreme of image, and the performance of electronic equipment doubles every 0/8 months. In order to pursue better quality, I need to keep chasing new models.

Film reliability

Film has a high tolerance, overexposure is not a big problem at all, and timely raw format on digital SLR is also difficult to make up. Especially when shooting in natural wind, the film can easily cope with large light ratio. Digital SLR basically does not have all kinds of polarization and color filters, so it is impossible to shoot landscape films. So the film is more like the human eye.

emotion

The film's unknowability of the result gives people more expectations than pressing the shutter to know whether it is successful or not. The success of shooting gives the filmmakers a greater sense of accomplishment, and the failure also gives the photographers a better opportunity to sum up. In digital photography, the failed photos were basically deleted at that time, and it was difficult to improve themselves.

Of course, there are more, so I won't say much. Too many dramatic conversations.

Second, why use numbers?

In some cases, numbers must be used.

For example, news interviews and commemorative photos of family and friends need to be submitted in time. Sports scenes and animal shooting need a lot of technical assistance, and the failure rate is relatively high, so the film can't be hold.

Later, it was completely digitized.

I won't explain this.

convenient

Convenience is sometimes an advantage and sometimes a disadvantage, but it is undeniable that you will know what it looks like immediately after shooting, which reduces a lot of duplication in work.

Question 3: What is the difference between a paraxial film camera and a SLR film camera? Mainly in the form of framing and focusing. SLR cameras are not necessarily the "only" focal plane curtain shutter (for example, Kangtai Flex series produced by 1950 s, SLR cameras of Fu Lunda, Aikefa and other brands are mirror shutters; Similarly, paraxial cameras are not all mirror shutters. For example, Leica's paraxial camera, Zeiss's Contax series camera and Soviet Fede series paraxial camera are all curtain shutters ...)

The following are references to related issues, and I believe the contents are all relevant. If you have any questions, you can add them, and then we will discuss them.

You can refer to:

Zhidao.baidu/question/118292231's "On the difference between paraxial camera and SLR camera in actual operation-mainly focusing on framing".

For related content, please refer to the original post that is not empty and targeted, and copy your own:

Zhidao.baidu/question/109909669, "What does a SLR camera mean?"

Zhidao.baidu/question/110095316, "What is the macular focusing of a paraxial camera?" Where is the macula? 》

Zhidao.baidu/question/109357210, "What's the difference between this camera and ordinary cameras?"

Zhidao.baidu/question/121623990's Some Questions about Close-axis Photography.

Question 4: Which is better, film SLR camera or digital SLR camera? Film SLR cameras and digital SLR cameras exist in the market, naturally for their own reasons:

1. For film SLR cameras, silver halide particles (35mm film) are used to record photo information in analog form. The area of 35mm film contains about 1 100 million effective particles, which records the photo information, which is equivalent to 1 100 million pixels of a digital camera. There is no way to compare the resolutions of top digital cameras and film SLR cameras.

Therefore, at present, the film SLR is generally used to take beautiful enlarged photos.

2. Digital SLR cameras, because the current display/transmission/output of photos generally does not exceed its resolution, so more than 6 million photos can basically meet daily and even professional needs. The advantages of digital SLR cameras are obvious, without development, instant display and instant transmission ... So in general, digital SLR cameras have greatly exceeded the application scope of film SLR cameras.

Question 5: Which is better, a digital SLR camera or a film SLR camera? The biggest difference between a digital camera and a film camera is the photosensitive element behind the shutter. A digital camera is an image sensor and a film.

The advantages of film are large tolerance and good quality, but it is more troublesome to print, and it is impossible to check the shooting effect often, which requires a lot of experience to be skilled in using.

The disadvantage of digital camera is low tolerance, but the shooting quality needs to be determined according to the size and pixel of photosensitive element. It can be viewed directly on the computer without printing, and the shooting effect can be viewed at any time when shooting.

In terms of image quality, the best is the large-format camera, followed by SLR cameras, ordinary 35MM film cameras and digital cameras. In terms of portability, digital cameras have more advantages, or we should consider the specific situation.

Question 6: What's the difference between a film camera and a SLR or a digital camera? In fact, it is the difference on the back of the camera. Take the top-end 645 camera as an example. These cameras can replace the film back and digital back, which means that the same camera can use both digital and film. The difference between digital and film is related to two points, one is the image quality, and the other is the shooting method.

Strictly speaking, film records light and shadow better than digital. Because the contrast, resolution and color of the film come from the chemical characteristics of the drugs on the film, the resolution recorded on the film will be higher, the color transition will be richer and the tolerance will be greater. For example, from red to orange, there may be a number of 10 and a film of 1000. In short, if you think of the photosensitive element as jpg, then the film is bmp.

But the advantages of movies also come at a price. First of all, movies shot on non-SLR cameras can't be previewed by what you see is what you get, and even on SLR cameras, you can't browse the already shot pictures. All the shooting results will not be known until they are developed in the darkroom. Therefore, film shooting often requires more photographic experience, otherwise it is easy to waste film. At the same time, many photographers will try several combinations of aperture and shutter when shooting film, and they will also carry a lot of film with them. Then the later stage of filming must be done in a dark room, not on the computer like us. If we have to do the latter, we must scan it into the computer with the help of advanced negative scanner and then process it. Digitalization can overcome these problems.

So to put it bluntly, film camera and digital camera are the compromise between shooting difficulty and imaging quality.

Question 7: SLR film camera or SLR digital camera, who has better imaging effect? There is no doubt that it is a digital camera. If this question was put in 10 years ago, digital cameras would be regarded as a joke. Five years ago, the movie couldn't laugh, but now the movie has been completely driven out of the field of 135, which only exists in the hands of some players and does not occupy the mainstream position.

The resolution and latitude of digital cameras have completely surpassed those of film cameras in the 135 era.

Question 8: Is the film camera still worth using? 1. The charm of film can't be surpassed by current digital technology (I don't know if it can be surpassed in the future), especially the color expression and color tolerance of film;

2. Today's digital images are proud of being able to simulate film imaging;

Although the medium width machine like 645 is very good, it is still digital. Today's digital technology, even the medium-sized imaging, still can't catch up with 135 film, let alone the medium-sized and large-sized film.

The cost of playing film is very high. Besides AE 1 film cameras and films with different sensitivities and imaging styles, it is necessary to develop equipment, including hardware and consumables.

5. To learn to shoot with film, we must first learn the developing technology. It is not recommended to use film without learning and development. Development technology is like digital post-technology. I don't know digital post-technology, I can't play DSLR well, I don't know developing and printing technology, and I can't play film well.

6. If you just shoot with film and then go to Kodak to develop it, it's not called playing with film. It is best not to use film.

7. The children's shoes upstairs said that most of the high-quality award-winning photos were taken with film, only half of them were right, and the other half were all developed by themselves.

Question 9: What brands of film cameras are good, Leica, Lulai, Hasselblad, Kangteshi, Canon and Nikon? .................