Sun Wu's Art of War: 82 articles. Really?

This eighty-two chapters of Sun Wu's Art of War was forged by modern people, and the National Academy of Military Sciences has long identified it as false. Advanced identification techniques, such as carbon identification, also show that the earliest time for Sun Wu to write eighty-two articles of The Art of War was not earlier than 1970.

For example, the so-called "Eighty-two Articles of the Art of War by Sun Wu" published by the counterfeiters contains many mistakes and fatal injuries that even the counterfeiters themselves cannot explain. For example, there are many poems, idioms and tactics that are only available in later generations, and there are cases that happened later.

Moreover, from the connotation, the quality of fabrication is relatively low, which completely deviates from the original quality of Sun Tzu's Art of War. Sun Tzu's Art of War (also known as Sun Wu's Art of War, corresponding to Sun Bin's Art of War) should have been such a masterpiece with rich connotations. Without careful reading, it is impossible to thoroughly understand its meaning, thus making people feel "ordinary". However, the inferior forgery technology and the deliberately patchwork words in the eighty-two articles of Sun Wu's Art of War will make people understand the meaning of "author (forger)" quickly, but apart from some tactical situations (because it is limited and outdated), there will be no gains.

Let's talk about the so-called "controversy".

This book has been identified as a forgery by experts and national appraisal departments, and there should be no dispute. At least, the results of carbon identification show that the writing time of this book is not earlier than 1970, and a large number of fatal mistakes of "Guan Gong vs Qin Qiong" written in the above 82 Art of War are enough to illustrate the problem.

Then why is it controversial?

In fact, this is entirely made by the fake team of "82 Articles of Sun Wu's Art of War" on the Internet.

Controversy is the point, right?

In the Baidu Encyclopedia of Sun Tzu's Art of War, it also says "Sun Wu's Art of War is eighty-two". This is actually the reason why their anti-counterfeiting team entered Encyclopedia (Baidu Encyclopedia has always been the least censored, and then various junk websites reprinted or copied). However, someone checked, and the submitted Baidu account submitted "82 articles of Sun Wu's Art of War are authentic" and "Zhang Zangben (the forger) Guiguzi is authentic" in the Baidu Encyclopedia of Sun Tzu's Art of War within 2 minutes.

This is obviously an encyclopedia compiled by counterfeiters, because within 2 minutes, Sun Tzu's Art of War and Guiguzi's Baidu encyclopedia can't be read 1%. How to confirm the modification?

Then there are specific events.

In fact, there are only a few accounts that have been promoting the eighty-two articles of Sun Wu's Art of War on the Internet. But I don't know how much benefit it is. Those people actually posted on every forum to publicize that the so-called "Eighty-two Articles of the Art of War by Sun Wu" is an original. But once someone retorts, they will be speechless and swear.

And if you look for it, you will find that there are only a few naive appraisal articles written by a few people themselves on the Internet.

There is even a so-called "public apology letter" written by the main appraiser himself. In fact, this is an "apology letter" written by the fake team itself. Bullying others to judge everyone, the old academic school can't surf the internet, but it just doesn't know about it.

In fact, there's nothing to argue about, because "Eighty-two Articles of the Art of War by Sun Wu" is a modern fake. Moreover, the quality of fraud is inferior, and there will be no progress after reading it. It even distorts the time of historical events in memory and makes people look at jokes.

At that time, they thought they could fool the eyes of experts, so they "invited" experts to identify them. Later, when it was identified as a fake, it began to "coerce and lure". As a result, people are real scholars and don't care at all. No way, they are now smearing others on the Internet and writing their own apology letters in each other's name, so they can understand the truth and falsehood at once.

In addition, if someone tells them not to accept it, take it out and identify it again. As a result, they dare not. They agreed to regret it tomorrow, saying that the appraiser didn't understand and that the appraiser was entrusted by others or something.