What does Judge Nanjing mean? Who can introduce it!

It's about the Peng Yu case that has attracted national attention.

On the morning of June 20th, 2006, Peng Yu, a Nanjing man, said that he was taken to court on June 4th, 2007 because he helped an old lady who fell. On September 3rd, the court awarded Peng Yu 45,876 yuan. According to the verdict, "Peng Yu thought he was the first person to get off the bus. From the common sense analysis, he is more likely to collide with the old lady. If Peng Yu hadn't beaten the old lady, he wouldn't have to take her to the hospital. " .

After the case was pronounced, public opinion was in uproar and the legal profession was humiliated.

See the post of a netizen at that time for details:

On June 20, 2006, Peng Yu kindly lifted an old man who fell to the ground at a bus stop in Nanjing and sent him to the hospital for examination. I don't want to. When the injured Mrs. Xu and her family learned that the tibial fracture would cost tens of thousands of yuan in medical expenses, they insisted that Peng Yu had hit someone and asked him to bear tens of thousands of yuan in medical expenses. After being rejected, the old man brought a lawsuit to the Gulou District Court in Nanjing, demanding that Peng Yu compensate for various losses of 1.3 million yuan. The only witness in this case, Mr. Chen, stated in court that he saw the old lady running to the third bus with a thermos bottle in her hand. When she ran behind the second car, she fell down for some reason. At this moment, he saw Peng Yu who got off at the back door of the second car take a few steps, stepped forward to help, stepped forward to help himself, and called the old man's children. The whole process takes about half an hour. Ms Xu once said in court that she didn't know Mr Chen. At that time, he did not help himself. Mr. Chen was very angry and suggested that he called the old lady with his mobile phone. There are phone records in the mobile phone to prove it.

Mrs Lao Xu's son is a policeman. When the judge in charge applied to the police station at that time to collect the original transcripts of Peng Yu, Mr. Chen and Ms. Gao, the dispatched office could not provide them on the grounds that they were under renovation. Later claimed that the transcript was lost. The police chief said that I looked for it at least six times, but I still couldn't find it, but I took down the transcript and said, "In order to find out the facts, I took a transcript with my mobile phone." When asked whose mobile phone was taken away, the director took out his mobile phone and said it was his. Then, Peng Yu called up the Exif information of the photo in front of the director, proving that the photo was not taken by the director's mobile phone. Under the reporter's questioning, the director told the truth: the photo was taken by the old man's son. Director Lu said that the old man's son told him that he was a colleague, so he detained the old man's son's mobile phone. ...

Even people who have not studied law can feel the strangeness of this case according to common sense. However, the judge made an unprecedented judgment, and sentenced Peng Yu to compensate the plaintiff (Mrs. Xu Lao) for the loss of 45,876 yuan, which was paid within 10 days. This judgment deserves to be a world miracle. Let's enjoy it together:

The Nanjing Gulou District Court held that the old lady was injured in a collision with Peng Yu. The reason is: "According to the analysis of daily life experience, the reason why the old lady (plaintiff) fell to the ground is not only the external factors of others, but also her own reasons such as tripping or slipping. However, neither side stated the fact that the old lady tripped or slipped during the trial. Therefore, according to the existing evidence in this case, we should focus on analyzing the external force that the old lady was knocked down. "

The verdict continued: "After a person is knocked down by an external force, he will generally first determine the source of the external force and identify the person who collided; If the person who hit someone escapes, the first reaction of the person who was knocked down is to call for help and ask someone to help stop it. The location of the incident in this case was the bus stop in a public place, and the incident occurred in the morning with good sight. The accident happened in such a short time that it was impossible for the person who knocked down the old lady to escape easily. According to Peng Yu, he was the first person to get off the bus. From the common sense analysis, he is more likely to collide with the old lady. "

The court held that if Peng Yu was doing good deeds, "it is more practical to catch the person who knocked down the plaintiff, rather than helping each other in good faith." "If the defendant is doing a good deed, according to social common sense, after the arrival of the old lady's family, it can completely explain the facts and let the old lady's family take her to the hospital and then leave by themselves. However, Peng Yu didn't make such a choice, and his behavior obviously violated reason, "the verdict wrote.

"If he didn't hit it, he shouldn't pay for it." After the family sent the old lady to the hospital, Peng Yu once took out more than 200 yuan to pay for the medical expenses of the old lady's family. Peng Yu explained, "At that time, the old lady was in a hurry to see the old man and said she had no money. Only in this way did I give them the money, and his family also said that they would give me an iou. " Now this has become one of the evidences for which he is responsible. The verdict reads as follows: "On the day of the crime, Peng Yu gave the old lady more than 200 yuan and never asked her to return it. There are different opinions about the reasons why Peng Yu gave money: the old lady said that it was the compensation paid in advance by Peng Yu; Peng Yu thought it was a loan. "

"Peng Yu and the old lady are strangers, and generally don't borrow money rashly. Even if you borrow money, as Peng Yu said, you should find other people who have no interest in the bus platform to prove it, or ask for an iou or explanation after explaining the situation to the old lady's family. However, Peng Yu did not have the above situation in this case. It is unlikely that he will lend money to the old lady when she is accompanied by her family to the hospital. "

"If someone is injured, the most reasonable thing is to pay in advance." According to the above judgment, the court held that the 200-odd yuan was not a loan, but compensation.

Let go of Peng Yu. Did you hit someone or save someone? As far as this judgment is concerned, it is the most retarded judgment in history. This judgment is a complete subversion and betrayal of the law! It is blatant rape and blasphemy against the law! This practice of judging cases by imagination and reasoning is an unprecedented retrogression and a blatant encroachment and destruction on human conscience and moral bottom line!

The judge's decision requires "taking facts as the basis and taking the law as the criterion". However, these judgments are always expressed in a tone of reasoning and speculation. Where is this judgment? Obviously, this is a novel full of strange imagination. In broad daylight, the court actually decided the case with a poor literary youth! Shit! ! !

The most retarded sentence in history insulted the IQ of China people!

I think, even if another dog sat in the judge's position, it wouldn't make such an incredible mistake, because it doesn't have that strange wisdom and way of thinking!

When the old lady fell and someone saved her, the judge can conclude that "his behavior is obviously against reason". How dark our society should be in this judge's mind! How vicious the human heart should be! If the judge's mother falls down and dies because there is no one to save her, does the judge still have reason to complain about the lack of love in society? No, people's love is ruined by this stupid and retarded judgment!

I have been a journalist for more than ten years, and I have seen many grievances, but I have never been so angry about a verdict. The harm of this judgment is that it completely destroys people's love in the form of law! This is blatantly leading people to evil! It warns people never to help others when they are in danger, otherwise they will set themselves on fire and bring endless pain and disaster to themselves. This wrong guidance is obviously contrary to justice and the road. How cruel our society will be if everyone protects himself and doesn't lend a helping hand in times of danger! The problem in our society now is not the overflow of love, but the overflow of selfishness! What is needed to build a harmonious society is to advocate love, not to stifle love and kindness. Anyone who has a public heart should understand how eager and strong our society is for love and kindness!

My anger is that this mentally retarded judgment completely deviates from the public interest thought that I have been pursuing all my life. It is like a sword, which deeply stings me, makes me feel unbearable pain, and makes me make the most angry reaction in a conditioned way!

It is very dangerous to make a final decision according to imagination.

What if I follow the judge's thinking? The judge may have been kicked in the skull by a donkey at birth, or he was seriously frightened. Otherwise, it is "obviously against reason" to make such a judgment; The judge may benefit from it, otherwise, it is "obviously unreasonable" to make such a judgment ... so that he can continue to reason. If the first reasoning holds, I suggest that the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) organize a thorough inspection of the court system. Anyone who has a negative IQ, a history of being kicked in the skull by a donkey after birth, and has been seriously frightened will be removed from the jury team, so as to avoid similar embarrassing mentally retarded judgments becoming the laughing stock of this era. At the same time, it is necessary to thoroughly investigate the relevant responsible persons who issue certificates for such judges, and why such a guy with insufficient brains should be introduced into the court system.

I also suggest that the case be re-examined to investigate whether there is perjury, external interference in the administration of justice or even corruption behind it. To make a fair judgment with convincing evidence, fortunately, people are innocent, showing the ferocious face of the wicked to the world, safeguarding the dignity of the law and defending the justice and moral bottom line of mankind!

If the judge thinks that what I said in this article is "obviously irrational", he is welcome to bring a lawsuit to the court. Shi Hanbing is my real name. By the way, remind the judge that according to the burden of proof, you should sue me, prove that the guy whose skull I wrote was kicked by a donkey is you, and show your birth certificate, medical appraisal of being kicked by a donkey, and medical appraisal of negative IQ. I don't believe that I happened to have bad luck. I met a young literary man with a strange imagination in court and sentenced me to lose the case before I saw clearly whether I was handsome or not!

Written on September 6, 2007